Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Classical music...


stankowalski

Recommended Posts

Ok, I guess I'm getting to the age that I'm really starting to get into classical music. I used to think it sucked and saw no redeeming value in it whatsoever. However, with most of today's music sucking even worse, I've started checking out some classical music. I know next to nothing about the genre so I bought 3 collections from Amazon MP3. (Great deal btw...I got almost 300 songs for about 10 bucks).

I'm looking for some suggestions to listen to. A few examples of what I've found particularly good from the collection I've gotten:

1. L'Estasi Dell'oro (from The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly)

2. Adagio for Strings, Op. 11a (from Platoon)

3. Carmina Burana (Cantiones Profanae)

4. Carmina Burana: O Fortuna

5. Danse Macabre, Op. 40

Besides getting suggestions to listen to, can anyone explain why so many songs are named with Op. XX or just Concerto no. 4 in D Major(or whatever key). Can these people not come up with actual names or what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Op. is just short for Opus and concerto is simply the form of the piece.

A concerto (from the Italian: concerto, plural concerti or, often, the anglicised form concertos) as a musical work is a composition usually in three parts or movements, in which (usually) one solo instrument (for instance, a piano or violin) is accompanied by an orchestra.

The term classical music covers a whole lot of time and a whole lot of styles. To understand everything takes a lot of studying.

Just listen to lots of stuff to find out what you like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only problem i have with Classical music is sometimes i have no idea what the piece i'm enjoying is called or who composed it. So i can never find it online or in the stores.

Tchaikovsky is hands down my favorite composer btw. The man hits me in the gut.

That's my main problem too. Most of the classical stuff I like has been in movies so that's the only reason I know them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Id say stick with some of the major composers like Beethoven, Mozart, Vivaldi, etc; lots of their stuff is used in movies. Beethoven and Dvorak are my favorites. My parents used to run the local public radio station so I grew up with classical music. There are so many good ass songs out there, you just gotta dig and find a style or composer you like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recommend the Brandenburg Concertos by J.S. Bach. If you just listen to it you will see how extremely complex the music is. You've probably heard No. 3 before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i was raised on classical. my dad's side of the tree was very musical. dad was a guitarist and singer in a rock band out of high school. then he was a am radio dj.

Just start with any cd that is the best of a particular composer then slowly drill down to more stuff.

you can pick up nuances so when you hear on the radio a composer you can tell by the pace or the use of a certain instrument at certain times.

plus, the many uses of instruments is good for the brain. i will quiz my kids when a solo pops up and ask them to name that brass or woodwind etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am a big fan of classical. Can't go wrong with Mozart, Bach or Beethoven but Vivaldi is one of my favorites. He was a violin master and demended nothing short of perfection from his performers.

Here are some of my favorites...

From Concerto for 4 violins in B minor, 3rd movement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's certainly what we hope but c'mon... stating it as fact when he's never played a down of NFL football? 
    • What?!?!?! Chark's 1,000 yard season was 4 years before he played for us and he only had 525 yards in 15 games as our #1 WR.  Dude has 3,100 yards in 7 seasons, he's the literal definition of a JAG and you think he is better than half our current WR room? T-Mac is literally already better than Chark was at his peak, which again, was years before he ever even put on a Panthers uniform, and there is a real argument to be made that XL and Coker were both better as rookies than Chark was for us in his one season here.
    • Im glad we're starting low. It's nonsensical to put us at 28 IMHO based on objective things IMHO (I think 21-24) is far more appropriate but whatever. Washington was at the bottom last year FWIW.  In 2003, Sports Illustrated said our best chance to win the division was to transfer to the ACC. In 2015, everyone wrote us off as a team that snuck into the playoffs with a losing record in 2014 and lost our best WR in TC (Kelvin Benjamin). All these videos are fodder for conversation, but this prediction has no more validity than saying the Panthers are making the SB bc we're starting the season against the Jaguars again. If Bryce plays like he did down the stretch we will end up the season just fine. This roster is much better than it has been the last 2 seasons. No one knows who any season will ultimately end up, but this team is finally being built in the right way, and the idea that this roster can't compete this year is as insane as being it was when we were gaslit in 2023 that we were a rookie QB from winning the division with that roster.  
×
×
  • Create New...