Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Think about what you'd have to trade...


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

...in order to acquire Peyton Manning.

Now imagine that you're trading for Manning in his youth, with his whole career still ahead of him. Now what do you think you'd have to give up?

The answer to that question likely borders on the ridiculous.

But whatever that is, that's what we'd need to ask for in order to trade away the #1 pick if Andrew Luck comes out.

And if you'd be willing to give that pick up for anything less, all I can say is I'm glad you're not GM :nonod:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Herschel Walker trade 2.0

seriously though, I think that Luck would be able to get two firsts, a second, and maybe a good player.

I wouldn't trade it though. Would rather just take Luck and build around him in future drafts like the Colts did with Peyton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That being said, Mr. Scot, if you were a betting man, what do you think the odds would be of the Panthers trading the 1st away? That is, if the asking price was met, but not foolish on the other teams part.

If Luck comes out, I wouldn't want them to trade the pick. That's kinda the point.

Can you seriously think of anything that would have adequately compensated the Colts for giving up Manning? I can't.

And yet I've heard people say stuff like "Hey, let's trade the number one and maybe we can get a guard, a defensive tackle and a receiver". Seriously? People think a guard, a DT and a WR would be worth giving up the next Peyton Manning? Thank the Lord they're not in charge :nonod:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And yet I've heard people say stuff like "Hey, let's trade the number one and maybe we can get a guard, a defensive tackle and a receiver". Seriously? People think a guard, a DT and a WR would be worth giving up the next Peyton Manning? Thank the Lord they're not in charge :nonod:

I think those people's opinion of Luck is different. No one is suggesting that we trade the next Peyton Manning because they don't think he's going to be that good. I'm of the opinion that if he comes out we should get him, but people can look at him different and that's fine. You can't compare him to Peyton Manning like it's a foregone conclusion because it's not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think those people's opinion of Luck is different. No one is suggesting that we trade the next Peyton Manning because they don't think he's going to be that good. I'm of the opinion that if he comes out we should get him, but people can look at him different and that's fine. You can't compare him to Peyton Manning like it's a foregone conclusion because it's not.

Ah, but what if he is that good?

No, we don't know the future, but think about it in terms of the potential consequences of each choice.

If you keep the pick and draft a QB who turns out to be a bust, yes it's bad. It's also something that a dozen or more successful GMs have done in the past few decades. A setback, for certain, but not an insurmountable one.

On the other hand, if you pass up the next Peyton Manning (or a guy who proves to be even better) then you are officially certified as the biggest moron in the history of pro football and, quite deservedly, laughed out of the league. That's the kind of mistake your career never recovers from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the other hand, if you pass up the next Peyton Manning (or a guy who proves to be even better) then you are officially certified as the biggest moron in the history of pro football and, quite deservedly, laughed out of the league. That's the kind of mistake your career never recovers from.

Agreed. All we need to do is speak with Portland Trail Blazer fans and how they feel about their team passing up Michael Jordan.

So if we do trade the pick, the minimum return I would expect is:

1st

2nd

3rd

1st next year

2nd next year

good player

star player

That is the opening bid for Luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...