Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I think I figured one part of Fox out..


SorthNarolina

Recommended Posts

This is just a theory now. Let's keep that in mind.

Pretty much all of Fox's tenure he's been very inconsistent. It's also been noted that he's a "player's coach".

I think these two qualities are very closely related.

Fox gives the team breaks when they do well, even cutting training camp short before they have proved anything. Bye weeks are seen as breaks regardless of playoffs.

These kind of actions are almost like a parent/child. View his actions as unconditional support. As apposed to a boss/employee who only offers conditional support relative to your performance.

So as a result the players all love him and play hard for him. But also there is nobody there to fight the inevitable lapse in motivation that will happen with most players. He'll support them unconditionally whether they suck or not.

Think about the clapping. They get a clap regardless.

I think his philosophy works well overall but it leads to the team being streaky when there isn't an ideal mix of leaders/chemistry. I also think that's why he could never put a back to back winning season together.

Just a thought. He's a good coach but I don't think his strategy will ever be consistent. Too much of the coaching is left up to the players.

Just a thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also think this is why he's been able to salvage disastrous seasons into mediocre ones.

The team really fights hard for him until the very, very end because they love him.

But they also love him because he really just lets them do their thing and supports them either way. There are in control of really motivating themselves.

So I think inevitably the players get a little content with success and quit working as hard as they did so they sink down.

Just a theory but it sure feels that way sometimes. Everytime we're good we immediately follow up with dissapointment. During a lot of the pooty seasons we end up winning games in the end that are only moral victories. But many teams give up at that point, for some reason we don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont think he is detail-oriented enough. Yes, they play hard for him but at the end of the day I see a great d coordinator/assistant. He doesnt adjust well to the trends year in and year out and he's too emotionally involved with players, this is business man

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...