Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Verdict: 2001 vs 2010


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Our offense was at least decent in 2001, even if Weinke loved to throw those high INTs. Our defense kept letting us down late. We were in most games.

Very few games this season were close enough for our defense to let us down like in 2001. 2001 was easily the better year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stats could be used to say which team performed worse, but that's not so much what I care about.

I'm more interested in which one hurt more to watch (for those who sat through both).

This one was worse to watch, and it hurt a helluva lot more. Most of the games were not even competitive, whereas, in '01, the games were in question until late in the game (at least).

TBH, I'm not disappointed in the players (for the most part), I feel like they gave it their best. The ball bounced the wrong way at every break in the game, and the team struggled at the point of attack on offense and defense.

The thing about football, is there's always next week, and there's always next season. If you don't like what happened today, there's always a place for improvement, and a way to get there. Go Cats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The aversion to tying up too much money in the ground game around when it’s what’s winning us games is crazy to me. I get letting Rico walk if you think he’s easily replaceable but I don’t see many people arguing that, just applying an arbitrary salary cap based on what we think RBs are currently worth. I’d rather be stuck with Hubbard as an overpaid backup (not the worst one to have, mind you) than lose out on the most productive player on the offense personally.
    • Why do people keep saying things like “it’s not Young’s fault we spent so much to draft him”? Who cares if it’s his fault?  Nobody is saying send him to jail or anything.  People aren’t talking about blame for the decision to draft him, they’re talking about how bad he is as a QB and how we’d be much better with even an average QB.  Pointing out that we sunk a lot of resources into drafting him isn’t invalidated because he didn’t make that decision himself. Doesn’t matter whose fault that was, he’s still not playing like a QB who was drafted at all, much less one that cost two firsts, two seconds and a #1 WR. 
    • Might wanna edit your post https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/2025/01/13/rams-vikings-live-score-updates-nfl-playoffs/77665954007/
×
×
  • Create New...