Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

$anders Drama just got More Interesting for Panthers

MHS831

By MHS831,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You posted an opinion to in your own words "start a thread" of discussion on a public forum, so yeah kinda.

I'm not criticizing your personally. I'm just saying that when you type in an obviously intentional inflammatory way you're pretty much derailing your own thread right from the jump. Why?

He wrote a thesis and then started a new thread about something we have been discussing since Wed.  Why not simply add to the existing thread but I kindof have an idea of why he started a new one.........

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted
12 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Im trying to prove that you're a poor and pugnacious communicator but you're doing a more effective job of that than me so thanks. LOL

And now we get to the trolling confession:  if that is what you are trying to prove, how is that not a personal criticism? You insisted it was not.   Was your communication accurate?  Just stop it--

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted
12 minutes ago, Lurk21 said:

Another thing, if somebody trades ahead of us to get Sanders,  there is a possibility  of a panic run. Dart or Milroe chatter could make someone show their hand since it'd put a spotlight on the Saints taking the next qb available. 

That is a good point.  Dart, on some boards according to a few experts on NFL network is the #2.  I do not see it--I do not see Milroe as the #4.  Frankly, and I think most people are doing it,  if I had a qb need in 2025 I would patch the position as best I could with a vet and draft OL, TE, or WR.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

And now we get to the trolling confession:  if that is what you are trying to prove, how is that not a personal criticism? You insisted it was not.   Was your communication accurate?  Just stop it--

The guy starting a thread on the premise of a trolling nickname now accusing others of trolling. Amazing.

My point was you could've taken your inflammatory crap out and had a good productive thread but per usual you just want to bait a fight and then play victim when you get what you wanted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The guy starting a thread on the premise of a trolling nickname now accusing others of trolling. Amazing.

My point was you could've taken your inflammatory crap out and had a good productive thread but per usual you just want to bait a fight and then play victim when you get what you wanted.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted (edited)

Ten prospects that could be available at #21 (based on one site's Big Board).  I chose #21-#31 instead of trying to guess who might fall to that slot.

image.png.6e46e7f6770d5694da08af2db561243b.png

I see several EDGE guys, a couple of LBs, Barron-CB, Grant-NT Egbuka-WR and Loveland-TE.  I'm cool with this move down if it materializes.  We could use the services of any of these guys.

Edited by 45catfan
  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jb2288 Grand Master

jb2288

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The guy starting a thread on the premise of a trolling nickname now accusing others of trolling. Amazing.

My point was you could've taken your inflammatory crap out and had a good productive thread but per usual you just want to bait a fight and then play victim when you get what you wanted.

To be fair to OP the thread is fine. A few guys came in and started pooing on it, then for some reason you decided to pile on

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jb2288 Grand Master

jb2288

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Ten prospects that could be available at #21 (based on one site's Big Board).  I chose #21-#31 instead of trying to guess who might fall to that slot.

image.png.6e46e7f6770d5694da08af2db561243b.png

I see several EDGE guys, a couple of LBs, Barron-CB, Grant-NT Egbuka-WR and Loveland-TE.  I'm cool with this move down if it materializes.  We could use the services of any of these guys.

If we trade down to 21, get another first next year + a 2nd or 3rd this year, and still get Walker then Dan is getting a statue. I really like Egbuka too, think he can be a steal in the bottom of the first. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Ten prospects that could be available at #21 (based on one site's Big Board).  I chose #21-#31 instead of trying to guess who might fall to that slot.

image.png.6e46e7f6770d5694da08af2db561243b.png

I see several EDGE guys, a couple of LBs, Barron-CB, Grant-NT Egbuka-WR and Loveland-TE.  I'm cool with this move down if it materializes.  We could use the services of any of these guys.

I think it is kind of a sweet spot for us--unless one of the big 3 drop to us.  I would love Walker at 21, Mike Green (minus the character concerns) would be ideal. I don't even know why people do not like Pearce--but they seem to have red flagged him.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jb2288 Grand Master

jb2288

Posted
Posted
37 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

That is a good point.  Dart, on some boards according to a few experts on NFL network is the #2.  I do not see it--I do not see Milroe as the #4.  Frankly, and I think most people are doing it,  if I had a qb need in 2025 I would patch the position as best I could with a vet and draft OL, TE, or WR.

The problem with waiting, is as of now there really isn't a QB that's worth a first next year besides Arch. And he hasn't even started a season, who knows what happens. If the #1 next year is a QB needy team, they're taking Arch and you don't have an option to trade up. Obviously someone will show up and shoot up boards and maybe you do get 3 1st round grade guys, but as of now 2026 prospects have guys like Nico, Allar, Sellers, or Nussmeier as the 2nd behind Arch. Yuck

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

If we trade down to 21, get another first next year + a 2nd or 3rd this year, and still get Walker then Dan is getting a statue. I really like Egbuka too, think he can be a steal in the bottom of the first. 

The value chart I looked at has has the value difference at 600 points between our first round selections.  That value unto itself is pick #31 in the first round.  The Steelers do not have a 2nd rounder this year and would have to give us their 3rd rounder valued at 175 points, which means we would get their 2nd rounder next year.  So the Steelers would only have a 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th this year if that trade occurred.  That's a LOT to give up on Sanders who they seem to be simply lukewarm on.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

To be fair to OP the thread is fine. A few guys came in and started pooing on it, then for some reason you decided to pile on

That "trolling nickname" is the one Sanders created for himself.  Using a $ to represent a public figure in a discussion board is not trolling.  What our moderator did here was a clear example of trolling.  I am just going to block/ignore him because this is a recurrence.  He had one job!

images.jpg.84a0e5ee62171936776d7b20cfc611e6.jpg

Edited by MHS831
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jb2288 Grand Master

jb2288

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

The value chart I looked at has has the value difference at 600 points between our first round selections.  That value unto itself is pick #31 in the first round.  The Steelers do not have a 2nd rounder this year and would have to give us their 3rd rounder valued at 175 points, which means we would get their 2nd rounder next year.  So the Steelers would only have a 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th this year if that trade occurred.  That's a LOT to give up on Sanders who they seem to be simply lukewarm on.

I wouldn’t do it for fair value. Goes out the window when talking about your QB. I would need their 3rd this year and first next. Happy to stay at 8 if they don’t want to

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saca312
      In addition to Evero there's one large change that likely should happen.

      By Saca312 · Posted

      It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Puresteel55
      Carolina Panthers pick No. 19-2026 NFL Draft

      By Puresteel55 · Posted

      Bryce Boetcher
    • TylerDurden
      CBS Sports brief discussion about questionable Canales decision making

      By TylerDurden · Posted

      Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...