Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

$anders Drama just got More Interesting for Panthers


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You posted an opinion to in your own words "start a thread" of discussion on a public forum, so yeah kinda.

I'm not criticizing your personally. I'm just saying that when you type in an obviously intentional inflammatory way you're pretty much derailing your own thread right from the jump. Why?

He wrote a thesis and then started a new thread about something we have been discussing since Wed.  Why not simply add to the existing thread but I kindof have an idea of why he started a new one.........

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Im trying to prove that you're a poor and pugnacious communicator but you're doing a more effective job of that than me so thanks. LOL

And now we get to the trolling confession:  if that is what you are trying to prove, how is that not a personal criticism? You insisted it was not.   Was your communication accurate?  Just stop it--

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Im trying to prove that you're a poor and pugnacious communicator but you're doing a more effective job of that than me so thanks. LOL

hold up now, he was a reporter for 6 different newspapers show some respect

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Lurk21 said:

Another thing, if somebody trades ahead of us to get Sanders,  there is a possibility  of a panic run. Dart or Milroe chatter could make someone show their hand since it'd put a spotlight on the Saints taking the next qb available. 

That is a good point.  Dart, on some boards according to a few experts on NFL network is the #2.  I do not see it--I do not see Milroe as the #4.  Frankly, and I think most people are doing it,  if I had a qb need in 2025 I would patch the position as best I could with a vet and draft OL, TE, or WR.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

And now we get to the trolling confession:  if that is what you are trying to prove, how is that not a personal criticism? You insisted it was not.   Was your communication accurate?  Just stop it--

The guy starting a thread on the premise of a trolling nickname now accusing others of trolling. Amazing.

My point was you could've taken your inflammatory crap out and had a good productive thread but per usual you just want to bait a fight and then play victim when you get what you wanted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The guy starting a thread on the premise of a trolling nickname now accusing others of trolling. Amazing.

My point was you could've taken your inflammatory crap out and had a good productive thread but per usual you just want to bait a fight and then play victim when you get what you wanted.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ten prospects that could be available at #21 (based on one site's Big Board).  I chose #21-#31 instead of trying to guess who might fall to that slot.

image.png.6e46e7f6770d5694da08af2db561243b.png

I see several EDGE guys, a couple of LBs, Barron-CB, Grant-NT Egbuka-WR and Loveland-TE.  I'm cool with this move down if it materializes.  We could use the services of any of these guys.

Edited by 45catfan
  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The guy starting a thread on the premise of a trolling nickname now accusing others of trolling. Amazing.

My point was you could've taken your inflammatory crap out and had a good productive thread but per usual you just want to bait a fight and then play victim when you get what you wanted.

To be fair to OP the thread is fine. A few guys came in and started pooing on it, then for some reason you decided to pile on

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Ten prospects that could be available at #21 (based on one site's Big Board).  I chose #21-#31 instead of trying to guess who might fall to that slot.

image.png.6e46e7f6770d5694da08af2db561243b.png

I see several EDGE guys, a couple of LBs, Barron-CB, Grant-NT Egbuka-WR and Loveland-TE.  I'm cool with this move down if it materializes.  We could use the services of any of these guys.

If we trade down to 21, get another first next year + a 2nd or 3rd this year, and still get Walker then Dan is getting a statue. I really like Egbuka too, think he can be a steal in the bottom of the first. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Ten prospects that could be available at #21 (based on one site's Big Board).  I chose #21-#31 instead of trying to guess who might fall to that slot.

image.png.6e46e7f6770d5694da08af2db561243b.png

I see several EDGE guys, a couple of LBs, Barron-CB, Grant-NT Egbuka-WR and Loveland-TE.  I'm cool with this move down if it materializes.  We could use the services of any of these guys.

I think it is kind of a sweet spot for us--unless one of the big 3 drop to us.  I would love Walker at 21, Mike Green (minus the character concerns) would be ideal. I don't even know why people do not like Pearce--but they seem to have red flagged him.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

That is a good point.  Dart, on some boards according to a few experts on NFL network is the #2.  I do not see it--I do not see Milroe as the #4.  Frankly, and I think most people are doing it,  if I had a qb need in 2025 I would patch the position as best I could with a vet and draft OL, TE, or WR.

The problem with waiting, is as of now there really isn't a QB that's worth a first next year besides Arch. And he hasn't even started a season, who knows what happens. If the #1 next year is a QB needy team, they're taking Arch and you don't have an option to trade up. Obviously someone will show up and shoot up boards and maybe you do get 3 1st round grade guys, but as of now 2026 prospects have guys like Nico, Allar, Sellers, or Nussmeier as the 2nd behind Arch. Yuck

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

If we trade down to 21, get another first next year + a 2nd or 3rd this year, and still get Walker then Dan is getting a statue. I really like Egbuka too, think he can be a steal in the bottom of the first. 

The value chart I looked at has has the value difference at 600 points between our first round selections.  That value unto itself is pick #31 in the first round.  The Steelers do not have a 2nd rounder this year and would have to give us their 3rd rounder valued at 175 points, which means we would get their 2nd rounder next year.  So the Steelers would only have a 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th this year if that trade occurred.  That's a LOT to give up on Sanders who they seem to be simply lukewarm on.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

To be fair to OP the thread is fine. A few guys came in and started pooing on it, then for some reason you decided to pile on

That "trolling nickname" is the one Sanders created for himself.  Using a $ to represent a public figure in a discussion board is not trolling.  What our moderator did here was a clear example of trolling.  I am just going to block/ignore him because this is a recurrence.  He had one job!

images.jpg.84a0e5ee62171936776d7b20cfc611e6.jpg

Edited by MHS831
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

The value chart I looked at has has the value difference at 600 points between our first round selections.  That value unto itself is pick #31 in the first round.  The Steelers do not have a 2nd rounder this year and would have to give us their 3rd rounder valued at 175 points, which means we would get their 2nd rounder next year.  So the Steelers would only have a 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th this year if that trade occurred.  That's a LOT to give up on Sanders who they seem to be simply lukewarm on.

I wouldn’t do it for fair value. Goes out the window when talking about your QB. I would need their 3rd this year and first next. Happy to stay at 8 if they don’t want to

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...