Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade bait


MHS831

Recommended Posts

People get angry when you make suggestions about giving up a player or two to fill a need. They want to give away crap and get diamonds back. I wanted to start a thread where we mention players we might trade to fill needs, specifically QB, but it doesn't have to be. We will be weaker in one area to get stronger in another. Think of it as redistributing and equalizing the talent. Also remember that talent at the QB position, where talent is rare, is > talent at any other position.

Here is the list of Panthers we could trade. Some we may have to re-sign or tag, but you get the idea. Remember, in a trade, you have to give up talent to get talent!!

Mike Goodson: A KR, multi-purpose back with breakaway skills. In our new offense he may be even more valuable, but his string of 100 yard games gave him some value. The 2 fumbles didn't help him, but I think he has some serious trade value.

Dan Connor has the ability to start for many NFL teams, if he could just stay healthy. I would hate to lose him because he is great depth and special teams, but his value does us no good on the pine.

Deangelo WilliamsEasy people, easy. First read these points. In response to folks who say, "We need 4 rbs. We are going to an 18-game schedule." Here are some facts: Deangelo is awesome, which gives him value, of course. He has about 2 years left (RBs rarely hit 30 on top--he is 28). He was used HEAVILY at Memphis and has not finished a season since 2008. How will he play 18 games? The only way is if you use him less. If we have to use him less to keep him healthy, then his value to us decreases.

Steve Smith: I would not because what he can give us over the next 2 years is more than the player we get will give us in a career. However, we are young and rebuilding. We owe it to Smith to put him somewhere he can regain his form. He may want the trade, we may want him away from the youth. Either way, a team ready to win now might jump on Smith. Again, I would rather he give us all he has and retires here, but I suggest a trade for reasons other than the talent we would lose vs. get.

Charles Godfrey is (I think) an alternate for the Pro Bowl and I thought he was inconsistent this year. Jordan Pugh is good and waiting behing Godfrey, but a pro bowl free safety might have some value. Pugh has earned a place. Godfrey got a lot of picks this year (5 ?), but a few were thrown right to him. Go figure. Take advantage of his good fortune and consider using him as bait to get a good QB here.

I think that a trade is the only way we get a decent QB--the draft sucks at QB, the free agent market will as well. Will we make a trade? Hell no, so don't get worried about this too much. Just for sake of conversation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be fine with all except Godfrey, he is just gonna get better at this point.

I didn't like it too much either. However, if they wanted Godfrey and Connor for Kevin Kolb, bye CG. THe only reason I added Godfrey is because I think Pugh is going to be very good if he ever gets to play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Williams, Connor YES!!!

rest... NO!!!

Goodson/Stewart would be awesome if were to trade Williams, and just having 89 out on the field makes the D respect the Pass no matter how shitty our QB play is. The only one i'm not sure about is Godfrey, at times he looks good, and at times you have to wonder what he is doing, but for the value a trade would create for Williams and Connor, I would trade them

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Connor/Goodson/Godfrey most likely won't get you enough to make it worth your while.

I said we should move DWill to a desperate team like Green Bay before the trade deadline. You could really bend them over in a trade at that point but now, trying to work out a sign-and-trade, coming off two seasons on IR, his value is much much lower.

Same thing with Smitty, I would have tried to move him a year ago, but now he'll be lucky to net you a 4th.

This team just waits too long to try to move anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Connor/Goodson/Godfrey most likely won't get you enough to make it worth your while.

I said we should move DWill to a desperate team like Green Bay before the trade deadline. You could really bend them over in a trade at that point but now, trying to work out a sign-and-trade, coming off two seasons on IR, his value is much much lower.

Same thing with Smitty, I would have tried to move him a year ago, but now he'll be lucky to net you a 4th.

This team just waits too long to try to move anyone.

careful, I said that a few months back and all the Madden fantasy traders jumped me saying he is worth anywhere from a 1st to a 3rd... what a joke:lurk5:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...