Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Its almost Official: Ron Rivera will be named Panthers Head Coach


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

Darren Smith on 1090Am, San Diego was talking up Norv's brother Ron Turner as a possible OC.

If he is hired already and they are waiting until tomorrow to announce it...he could be spending the evening calling coaches right now trying to assemble a staff...perhaps there may be some leaks coming out about them (wishful thinking)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad to hear that the FO is close to getting this done.

This is definitely the guy I've wanted since before this season.

For those fans wanting a coach to get on his players, Ron Rivera is NOT one of those coaches. He isn't a yeller. He is an excellent communicator.

Not sure what he'll be like with the media, but I doubt he'll be forth coming enough for many of our fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just a little thought to mull around, it doesn't help this forum's case when everybody's supposedly sick of KT's race bait trolling when we haven't even 100% officially signed our first minority coach and everybody's going "OMG TACOSSSSZZZZ!!!!!111!!!one!!"

we have a winner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pantherclaw, WCNC showed a pretty awesome video of Rivera in San Diego RIPPING into his defensive guys during a game when the San Diego offense was on the field. It was about as animated as a coach can get.

Its not the defense I'm worried about. It's his game plan on offense that concerns me. Kind of sounds like the last head coach. Should be really exciting to watch.

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/sports/steelers/s_489264.html

"I grew up playing rough, tough, physical football," said Rivera, a former linebacker who got his coaching start with the Bears as a low-level defensive assistant in 1997. "You beat up your opponent, you got after them. (The Steelers') characteristic is they love running the football. I believe in running the football. As a defensive coach, I want to attack. Those are some of the characteristics that I believe the Rooneys are looking for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now if he installs a Jim Johnson system here, I would be a happy man. Assuming we find someone to fix the offense and we draft a quarterback.

This link suggests that they are informing other candidates that their services are not required. Must be talking dollars and cents at this point.

http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/player_main.aspx?sport=NFL&id=2352

you & me both. Riveria has played & coached in schemes that are agressive, so i think he will be the same here. hopefully our offense will improve but either way i will enjoy a defense that trys to dictate instead of react to what the other team is doing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Chargers are expected to interview 49ers in-limbo defensive coordinator Greg Manusky for the same position in San Diego.

It's a natural fit, and not just because Manusky runs a 3-4. A longtime Chargers special teamer in his playing days, Manusky spent the 2002-2006 seasons coaching San Diego's linebackers (under Wade Phillips for two of them), and was a very capable coordinator in San Francisco. He's leaving only because new coach Jim Harbaugh wants "his guy" (Vic Fangio).

So the Chargers already sitting up interviews for DC position... its pretty safe to say Rivera is a Panther.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Congratulations do they know who the father is?
    • In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
×
×
  • Create New...