Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anti-Ron Turner Campaign?

Catalyst

By Catalyst,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Catalyst Newbie

Catalyst

Posted
Posted

Anyone up for flooding Jerry's office with anti-Ron Turner letters? This guy was terrible for the Bears. I have a few friends who are Bears fans and they laughed when I brought up his name. They like the Rivera hire, but say Ron Turner would negate any positives Rivera brings to the team.

This cannot happen. We have to do whatever is in our power to make sure it doesn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Catalyst Newbie

Catalyst

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I'd be more than happy with the Chargers TE's coach or QB's coach. I just think Turner has shown from his time in Chicago that he's not the kind of O.C. we need. Now, if they wanted to bring him in as an assistant-level coach I'd be fine with that, but not for O.C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

I'd be more than happy with the Chargers TE's coach or QB's coach. I just think Turner has shown from his time in Chicago that he's not the kind of O.C. we need. Now, if they wanted to bring him in as an assistant-level coach I'd be fine with that, but not for O.C.

Same thing though. how do we know Turner isn't better away from Lovie Smith?

Looking at it from the flip side, if you don't think Rivera has good judgment about picking personnel, why do you trust him with the head coaching job?

If you give him the job, letting him pick his staff is part of the deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Scourton isn't signed (& apparently it's a thing)

      By TD alt · Posted

      I agree, but I've already said that the players will definitely take more money up front because it's more security. But they want more guaranteed money and NFL FOs don't want to do that for several and various reasons, and that's what's at issue.  https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/nfl-second-round-rookies-finally-starting-to-sign-what-took-so-long-and-what-it-means-for-future-contracts/ It's a tug of war between teams and players, and, sure, paying a player a signing bonus may satisfy them, especially if--and sometimes "only if"--it ultimately leads to a guarantee of more of their contract, but the teams are on the hook for all of those guarantees when cap time comes, so if they guarantee more money, they're ultimately losing the contract game.
    • kungfoodude
      C Mc. Gotta love this guy!!

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      TBH, these are the kind of players that get weeded out of professional sports pretty quickly. Also, CMC is not that guy. There is zero indication that he isn't competitive. 
    • kungfoodude
      Teddy Checkdown in trouble

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I like the free agency. It actually helps basically all schools across the board. Pretty much only ancient HC's and/or HC's that haven't been able to adjust have been complaining about the free agency. Your fortunes can be made or broken every offseason. It's not like before where a bad recruiting class or two meant multiyear purgatory.  I will never understand all the bellyaching about the NIL. If you want to talk about what ruined college athletics, it has been naked greed. Conference expansions for TV revenue, ever skyrocketing AD and facilities costs and now the attempts to permanently ruin the postseasons(football and basketball).  All the kids did was get a very well deserved piece of a very, very, VERY broken pie.
×
×
  • Create New...