Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft choices narrowed to 5?


MHS831

Recommended Posts

From what I read, it seems the Panthers, barring a trade, will draft one of 5 players, even though I think the Panthers' list is smaller. It is SO HARD to decide--I see everyone's points and I have decided we need them all. Let us take a look at the pros and cons for each player in relation to long and short term needs:

AJ Green

Pros: Steve Smith would have been better in his prime had he not been the #1 WR, but he is sure no #1 now. Even he wants to move inside--or be traded. Green is Larry Fitzgerald and Calvin Johnson. He is 6'4" tall, can jump, and runs a 4.45 40. He catches everything. May not be great until the QB/OL is worked out, but he is an offensive force, the focus of the 2011 Panthers. What do we do in 2 years when Smith is 34? Put Gettis there? That won't scare people. Gettis is a complimentary WR, not the #1.

Cons: We just drafted 3 WRs and we have Steve Smith who still has some kick left. We have other more pressing needs. Green would be nice, but we have 2 DTs on the roster and they are an undrafted rookie and a practice squad player. There are 2 DTs in the top 5. The defense collapses without good DT play. Find offense in free agency or later in the draft.

Cam Newton

Pro: Probably the best comparison is Steve McNair. A rocket arm, everyone thought he couldn't read defenses, and good mobility. A good arm and a rather quick release.

Cons: Character has been tested, and he has failed. Runs a simple offense. Concerns that he (and his "agent" father and rhinestone-jerseyed mother) may be in this for the paycheck. That makes the comparison to Jamarcus Russell. Can the frachise afford to play roulette with the #1 overall pick at QB? If you support Cam, are you willing to lose for 3 years before he adjusts to the NFL?

Nick Fairley

Pros: Has dominated every game I have seen him play. Sacking QBs, breaking up screens, stuffing a goalline attempt, etc. The Panthers might need 3 DTs this year, by far the biggest need. Fairley is a force in the middle, and will be a successful 3 technique 4-3 DT or DE in the NFL.

Cons: Shoots the gap a lot. Dirty. The draft is deep at DT, and there is talent later. The Panthers may not need the flashy DT, but the 2 gap control 1 technique DT might be the bigger need.

Patrick Peterson

Pros: Fast, athletic, and big for a corner (6'1", 222 lbs). Will be nightmare for WRs getting jammed. Compared to Rod Woodson. A true shut down CB, but a nasty hitter/tackler as well. Playing opposite Gamble, the corners are very solid. Also a great return man.

Cons: His size could project him to S, where we have 3 good young players. Part of his value is based on his return skills, but do we want our #1 overall pick returning punts? Pat gets cramps and he has for some time. Is this nerves? A symptom of a health problem?

Da'Quan Bowers

Pros: Peppers II. A bit shorter (6'4") but he weighs 280 and runs a 4.6. DEs are crucial to the success of a 4-3, and we have 1 established pass rusher at the moment. Paired with Johnson and backed by Brown, Hardy, and Norwood, imagine Johnson and Bowers moved inside to DT and Brown and Hardy at the ends?

Cons: Underperformed at times in college, the biggest comparison to Peppers. We simply do not need another DE. Hardy and Brown are coming along, and Brayton is still under contract. Norwood will also be utilized as a DE in passing situations. Logjams don't make you better when you have no DTs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said that "from what i read" (meaning here on this site)--Newton is mentioned by a lot of people on the Huddle--He is in the debate. I would not draft him in the second round, but I put him on here because he is in the discussion

I think it is down to Green and Fairley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disagree. I don't see a single QB worth the number one spot.

Basically, between the draft (sans Luck) and free agency, it's a really lousy year to need a quarterback.

i agree, BUT it depends on if they have GIVEN up on Clausen, if they have then i think they take a QB, if they havent they sign a Marc Bulger to backup and mentor Jimmy while we draft either Green (to make the panthers recievers great) or they take a defensive player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Newton is not an option at #1.

Don't know that he really was before, honestly, but after last night, definitely not.

I dont agree. Last night didnt help his case but it didnt hurt it ether. He is just as much a prospect as Fairley at this point. Still at this point trading down if possible and picking up Peterson may be the best choice. I just dont see anyone that is a 1st pick except A.J. Green and we dont need him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stop for a minute and read--Newton is mentioned by a lot of people on the Huddle--He is in the debate. I would not draft him in the second round, but I put him on here because he is in the discussion/

Not really.

You've got one or two people vocally lobbying for him, but the overwhelming sentiment on here is that he's not worth the top pick.

The debate is pretty much over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
    • 1st ⭐️ Big Bussi - 17 saves, .941 save % 2nd ⭐️ Logan Dankoven - 2 assists, 3 SOG, +3, 16:25 TOI 3rd ⭐️ Ghost Bear - 1 goal, 3 blocked shots, +2, 18:48 TOI
×
×
  • Create New...