Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

My Guess Who Rivera's FA QB Is Gonna Be....

pantherfan81

By pantherfan81,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

bleys Newbie

bleys

Posted
Posted · Hidden
Hidden

You just don't seem worth the time.

there's nothing that says FAIL faster than a guy who rambles on a few pages about a bad QB and then when bitch slapped back into his place he replies "you're just not worth my time.. . how's that for dumb poo"..

:lol:

Link to comment
bleys Newbie

bleys

Posted
Posted

You just don't seem worth the time.

there's nothing that screams BITCH more than this.. :lol:

I was hoping you were about to raise a good point, but FAIL isn't even an appropriate response... :ack2:

how about in all the threads you go throwing your weight around like you know what you're talking about, you remember this moment about how you crashed and burned..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hawk Newbie

Hawk

Posted
Posted

I would but your post is annoying and I have nothing invested in Seneca Wallace.

Talk about dumb poo.

translated...

damn, I was hoping nobody would call me out on my stupid post thinking Wallace is a good qb and then I really pushed it by saying he was better than Hass....now I need to run with my tail between my legs!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRealDeal Newbie

TheRealDeal

Posted
Posted

there's nothing that screams BITCH more than this.. :lol:

I was hoping you were about to raise a good point, but FAIL isn't even an appropriate response... :ack2:

how about in all the threads you go throwing your weight around like you know what you're talking about, you remember this moment about how you crashed and burned..

I haven't read the whole fight with you two but it's a very good point he has. It happens all the time where poster A calls out poster B, Poster B comes back with some real insight and facts and Poster A either doesn't respond or responds with some BS answer and Poster B realizes it wasn't worth his time.

Perfect example: Cat'sgrowl says Moore makes sooooooo many mental mistakes in SF game and asks what I think he does well. I give detailed list of specific plays during certain games showing off different skillsets and in return I ask for ONE example of a mental mistake Moore made besides the TAINT and he gave me some BS response.

Not saying that is the case here, but there is a chance that if he provides you good data you would just move along and his time is wasted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Squirrel Collaborator

Squirrel

Posted
Posted

Well in 2008 both Wallace and Hassleback were with Seattle.

Hasselback started seven games and Wallace started eight.

Wallace was significantly better in Td's, Int's, qb rating, Ypa etc.

At this point in time Wallace you could argue Wallace is better then Hassleback. Although injuries have not helped Matt.

But what was the Win - loss ratio? A QB could have good stats but if the team still loses does it really matter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MaineManPanther Newbie

MaineManPanther

Posted
Posted

But what was the Win - loss ratio? A QB could have good stats but if the team still loses does it really matter?

The 2008 seahawks went 4-12, Wallace was responsible for three of those wins.

Does it matter for the team or in the grand scheme of things? No.

But when you use stats to compare two players as I am, I don't see a problem with it. What other way is there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Proudiddy
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By Proudiddy · Posted

      I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • Proudiddy
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By Proudiddy · Posted

      I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • DaveThePanther2008
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By DaveThePanther2008 · Posted

      You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...