Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Big Contracts


pantherj

Recommended Posts

Chris Gamble:

11/28/2008: Signed a six-year, $53.5 million contract. The deal contains $23 million guaranteed, including a $6 million signing bonus and another $10 million "signing" bonus in the second year. 2011: $6,244,117, 2012: $6.75 million, 2013: $7.9 million, 2014: $8.85 million, 2015: Free Agent

Ok this isn't too bad, but Gamble had better start giving 100% in every game.

Jordan Gross:

2/19/2009: Signed a six-year, $60 million contract. The deal includes $30.5 million in the first three seasons. 2011: $6 million, 2012: $8.5 million, 2013: $8.7 million, 2014: $6.7 million, 2015: Free Agent

:eek::svengo:

Steve Smith:

5/8/2007: Signed a six-year, $43.85 million contract. The deal included a $9.3 million signing bonus, a $6 million roster bonus in the second year, and a $2 million roster bonus in the third. 2010: $5.75 million, 2011: $7 million, 2012: $7.75 million, 2013: Free Agent

I think we should trade Smith if possible. He's given me a lot of amazing football memories, but we need to get the most bang for the buck.

Travelle Wharton:

2/14/2008: Signed a six-year, $35 million contract. The deal includes $12 million guaranteed. 2009: $1.75 million, 2010: $3.9 million, 2011: $5.4 million, 2012: $5.7 million, 2013: $5.9 million, 2014: Free Agent

I like Wharty, and he can be used as an OT if need be. Having said that, no freaking way is worth that kind of money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see Wharton being cut, but then we'd have two big needs at guard. You have to consider what it'd cost to replace him. Unless we draft someone who looks really good in camp I can't see him going anywhere.

I think we'll keep him, but I can't help but wonder how he got such a great contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice research....

I guess???? What exactly are you trying to say? We should have enough cap room (if and when there is a new cap) to pick up a couple more big contracts like beason, williams, and johnson. Plus we still need to make some type of big FA signing this year......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice research....

I guess???? What exactly are you trying to say? We should have enough cap room (if and when there is a new cap) to pick up a couple more big contracts like beason, williams, and johnson. Plus we still need to make some type of big FA signing this year......

Who would you keep? Who gets a big contract?

James Anderson

Thomas Davis

Charles Johnson

Ryan Kalil

Richard Marshall

Matt Moore

Dante Rosario

DeAngelo Williams

Link to comment
Share on other sites

James Anderson: Have to keep; young stud LB just coming into his prime.

Thomas Davis: Re-sign to 2 yr deal w/incentives for playing time/performance to prove he's fully recovered from his ACL tears.

Charles Johnson: Shouldn't be a question, IMO.

Ryan Kalil: 2-time Pro Bowler now and one of the best centers in the game. HAVE to lock him up.

Richard Marshall: Goodbye, and good riddance.

Matt Moore: Not that good + injury = no.

Dante Rosario: I wouldn't mind it; with Chudzinski he could develop into something good, but if they go elsewhere for a TE I doubt he gets re-signed.

DeAngelo Williams: Franchise + trade. If we can get a 2nd, great; if not, a 3rd will do. Some team will want a young stud Pro Bowl RB still in his prime. We're more than good to go at RB without him with Stewart, Goodson, & Sutton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

James Anderson: Have to keep; young stud LB just coming into his prime.

Thomas Davis: Re-sign to 2 yr deal w/incentives for playing time/performance to prove he's fully recovered from his ACL tears.

Charles Johnson: Shouldn't be a question, IMO.

Ryan Kalil: 2-time Pro Bowler now and one of the best centers in the game. HAVE to lock him up.

Richard Marshall: Goodbye, and good riddance.

Matt Moore: Not that good + injury = no.

Dante Rosario: I wouldn't mind it; with Chudzinski he could develop into something good, but if they go elsewhere for a TE I doubt he gets re-signed.

DeAngelo Williams: Franchise + trade. If we can get a 2nd, great; if not, a 3rd will do. Some team will want a young stud Pro Bowl RB still in his prime. We're more than good to go at RB without him with Stewart, Goodson, & Sutton.

We could probably get Marshall for cheap, and he plays pretty well when the pass rush is a factor. The rest I'd agree with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

James Anderson: Have to keep; young stud LB just coming into his prime.

Thomas Davis: Re-sign to 2 yr deal w/incentives for playing time/performance to prove he's fully recovered from his ACL tears.

Charles Johnson: Shouldn't be a question, IMO.

Ryan Kalil: 2-time Pro Bowler now and one of the best centers in the game. HAVE to lock him up.

Richard Marshall: Goodbye, and good riddance.

Matt Moore: Not that good + injury = no.

Dante Rosario: I wouldn't mind it; with Chudzinski he could develop into something good, but if they go elsewhere for a TE I doubt he gets re-signed.

DeAngelo Williams: Franchise + trade. If we can get a 2nd, great; if not, a 3rd will do. Some team will want a young stud Pro Bowl RB still in his prime. We're more than good to go at RB without him with Stewart, Goodson, & Sutton.

This is exactly what I would do, but I would keep Moore and Rosario., Even as a back up Moore can still be valuable, he had a "bad" year behind a shitty line that the "all mighty" clausen still managed to look like a pop warner qb, Other then that, Williams isn't really needed so trading him for the best value would be first on the list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

James Anderson: Have to keep; young stud LB just coming into his prime.

Thomas Davis: Re-sign to 2 yr deal w/incentives for playing time/performance to prove he's fully recovered from his ACL tears.

Charles Johnson: Shouldn't be a question, IMO.

Ryan Kalil: 2-time Pro Bowler now and one of the best centers in the game. HAVE to lock him up.

Richard Marshall: Goodbye, and good riddance.

Matt Moore: Not that good + injury = no.

Dante Rosario: I wouldn't mind it; with Chudzinski he could develop into something good, but if they go elsewhere for a TE I doubt he gets re-signed.

DeAngelo Williams: Franchise + trade. If we can get a 2nd, great; if not, a 3rd will do. Some team will want a young stud Pro Bowl RB still in his prime. We're more than good to go at RB without him with Stewart, Goodson, & Sutton.

You have to consider the possibility that we will need $$ to sign what we need now that is not in the draft. I am pretty sure we sign a QB and feel equally sure that we try to sign a veteran DT and possibly a RG. Even though we appear rich, we need to extend Beason and sign Kalil to a creative, rich contract. CJ will not be cheap after his year, and why do I think we will overpay for TDavis? Anderson was good, but also the benefit of the position, which should make a lot of tackles. There are players on our bench who will be evaluated (the Williams boys, Norwood, Connor) who may be better fits into the defensive scheme. Besides, I am not a Tarheel fan, but I think they were one of the best defenses in the country before they lost Quinn and Austin. I see Bruce Carter, Quan Sturdivant, and State's Nate Irving in the 3-5 rounds of many mocks. I have to think LB is pretty deep in the draft.

Lot of options, but we have room. I agree Smith may need to be traded, but don't expect much for him. DW might bring a third rounder; I think the best way to get his full value is to trade for a veteran OL, DT, CB, or QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Johnson, Kalil, Anderson, and Williams should all get deals from the Panthers

I'd let T. Davis walk (love the guy, but there is no chance he comes back to even 70% of what he was on a knee that he's blown out twice)

I was at the OTA when TD blew out his knee. They were warming up. However, I think you sign him to an incentive-laden deal, but you don't pencil him in as the starter yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Johnson, Kalil, Anderson, and Williams should all get deals from the Panthers

I'd let T. Davis walk (love the guy, but there is no chance he comes back to even 70% of what he was on a knee that he's blown out twice)

I think were able to keep Dan Morgan for cheap by offering him an incintive laden contract. If he plays, he makes a lot of money. If he doesn't recover, then he might make vet scale, I dunno like 250k? I think it would be worth it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's say we have a LT for 2026, because we do.  After that, let's say we Ickey could be back and we would have the option of extending Walker.   Don't get me wrong--I LOVE drafting OL.  Teams obviously get desperate for OTs and if they enter the draft without 2 solid tackles, they are almost obligated to reach for a first round OT.  This year, I see 1 OT who is probably worth first-round consideration, and I am not putting him in the top 10 players in the draft.  Lomu, Freeling, Miller, and Proctor, for example, probably and arguably have second-round value.  So why would you reach for an OT in round 1 when you already have starters at both T positions but you have other needs? We do need depth, however, and I think there is decent OT depth that needs development on day 3. They are no slouches, by the way.   Drew Shelton (could drop to round 4): Surrendered 1 sack as Penn State's LT in 2025. 33 3/8" arms.  Pass pro improved every year (4 years--experienced).  "For a team running a zone-heavy scheme that values lateral movement and reach-blocking ability over phone-booth mauling, Shelton has real appeal. He is not a plug-and-play starter, but the athletic tools and the clear year-over-year improvement suggest a player who can develop into a capable starter if a coaching staff invests in his strength base and cleans up his technique. The ceiling depends entirely on how much stronger he can get and whether his feet can stay alive after initial contact."   Austin Barber  (could drop to round 4): I see him as a RT at best and a probable kick inside to Guard where his strengths would switch from secondary to primary tools.  Considering Lewis and Hunt may be gone in a year or two, this would give the Panthers a chance to work him at RT and then move him inside if he is not effective, and there is confidence that G may be his best position. Jude Bowery (4th round projection) was LT on a Boston College OL that was effective in the run game.  Bowery is one of the most athletic OTs in the draft.  His arms are not ideal but not too short (33.75") to play LT.  He surrendered 2 sacks. He is raw, and needs some technical refinement with his hands.  I think he has the best upside and value for this offense.   Dametrious Crownover  TexAM (5th round projection; 35 3/8" arms) is one of the more fascinating developmental tackles in this class because the physical tools are legitimately rare. A strong run blocker who should be better in pass protection with his tools.  "You do not find many 6-7, 336-pound men with that foot speed and who have the athletic background of a converted tight end. When everything clicks, he looks like a starting right tackle in a gap-heavy run scheme, smothering defenders at the point of attack and using his length to erase speed off the edge. The 2024 tape, when he anchored one of the best rushing attacks in the SEC, is the version of Crownover that gets offensive line coaches excited."  THIS is the kind of player our coaches could develop until Moton is done. What made World intriguing coming out of Eugene was the untapped ceiling, a fifth-year transfer who arrived as the top-ranked offensive tackle in the portal and looked the part for stretches. The improvement he showed against Big Ten competition in his one Oregon season was real, and the physical foundation, length, athleticism, and improving technique in pass protection, is still there. The ACL tear suffered in the College Football Playoff semifinal against Indiana doesn't erase that, but it changes the conversation significantly. The injury clouds the immediate projection. Most ACL recoveries for offensive linemen run nine to twelve months, which means World is likely unavailable for meaningful action well into his rookie season at the earliest. The combine absence removes his chance to reset the narrative physically, and teams will be making decisions almost entirely off pre-injury film and medical evaluations. The contrast between his polished pass sets and his inconsistent run blocking was already a developmental concern, and now those technique issues get deferred further while he rehabs. Isaiah World  (Oregon, injured ACL in playoffs, 5th round projection--could slide to 6th).  World will not play much if at all in 2026, which is why he might fall.  For the Panthers' purposes, however, this would give the OL coaches time to work with him. "What made World intriguing coming out of Eugene was the untapped ceiling, a fifth-year transfer who arrived as the top-ranked offensive tackle in the portal and looked the part for stretches. The improvement he showed against Big Ten competition in his one Oregon season was real, and the physical foundation, length, athleticism, and improving technique in pass protection, is still there. The ACL tear suffered in the College Football Playoff semifinal against Indiana doesn't erase that, but it changes the conversation significantly." "That said, the investment argument isn't crazy for the right organization. This is still a tackle with first-round portal grades and the kind of athletic profile that doesn't just disappear. A team with patience and a strong offensive line room can afford to stash World on the roster, let him develop his lower-body power and pad-level consistency during the recovery process, and potentially unlock a starting-caliber right tackle somewhere in his second or third season. The path is longer now, but the destination hasn't changed for a scout willing to bet on the physical tools." You get the idea. If we do not need the OT immediately, draft one later and develop him as depth and for next season.  Most college players drafted in round 1 were not first rounders if they had entered the draft the year before,  so why not grab a player with upside?      
    • Its never the QBs fault, so if we get a new WR and he looks bad he must be a bust
    • Based on what? Its certainly not his in game coaching prowess. 
×
×
  • Create New...