Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Moore: I would love to stay in Carolina


The Saltman

Recommended Posts

:rofl:

It says that guy hopes they don't keep him, not that they likely won't.

Your hate for Moore is blinding whatever credibility you might have had. Many people realize he was the best QB on our roster last year and there isn't much in terms of upgrades out there.

What're you talking about?

A person asked Yas if we will resign him.

Pat doesn't think it's likely we will.

Your stuck so far up his butt you jump to defend him even when there's nothing to defend.

As far as upgrades being out there, I could post a whole page of Soon-to-Be FA QB's and 99% of them on there would be worth having over Moore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What're you talking about?

A person asked Yas if we will resign him.

Pat doesn't think it's likely we will.

Your stuck so far up his butt you jump to defend him even when there's nothing to defend.

As far as upgrades being out there, I could post a whole page of Soon-to-Be FA QB's and 99% of them on there would be worth having over Moore.

LOL...you better wait for your boys to jump in this thread because you are seriously behind. Most people, not just me, are thinking along the same lines as I am.

Please, tell me how 99% of the free agents are better than Moore, I'd love to hear it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

with the new offensive staff, there will be no continuity whatsoever with any of the quarterbacks. with that continuity gone, so is the main foundation for hope in matt moore as a panther. i think he's a goner.

Not sure I agree with that. John Fox was never exactly the world's biggest Matt Moore fan.

You could argue that he has a better shot with Fox gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure I agree with that. John Fox was never exactly the world's biggest Matt Moore fan.

You could argue that he has a better shot with Fox gone.

You could also argue that the reason Fox never wanted Moore to see the field was displayed when he finally got his shot..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People here have grown so accustomed to terrible QB play that Moore's terrible performance looks good to them.

79 143 55.2 857 6.0 5 10

Pretty impressive stuff there, Moore!

Clausen's isn't appreciably better, and Moore actually looked pretty good in the five games at the end of 2009.

I have no idea if Moore is better than he showed last year, but since we take four QBs to camp anyway and he'd be cheap, I see no reason not to at least check out what he'd look like being coached by someone other than Rip Scherer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does his rehab get handled when his contract is up but no CBA in place? is he just out on the street or will the team still get to help him?

No worries, his family has a lucrative yogurt bizzness in Cali. :D

At least MM got smitty involved in the offense, and when he was in, there was the very real option that each pass play might not be a checkdown...

:iagree:

At least he tried to get Smitty in the game...

Bring him back!

Yessir! I think the humility of having to sit and watch will rekindle his fire and he has more potential for being the kind of "Slinger" we are used to watching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...