Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Golden St. open to trading Curry


Britneck

Recommended Posts

I'd honestly let Jack and G-Dub go for him. Not together for one player of course, but I would definitely let go 2 of our core players for him.

He's already overcome that PG/SG tweener gap. Dude's a baller, and a potentially star. I would not be surprised to see either Wallace or Jack packaged with Nazr or an expiring big for Curry and Biedrins.

Jordan better make an effort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two 180lb guards starting in the backcourt. Yuck.

Curry can play SG, as a matter of fact he is a better SG than he is PG. Golden State is just foolish enough to have Curry play PG and Ellis play SG.

If it were to work than Jax not Gerald has to go because Curry is to good to come off the bench and Jax cannot play the SF position.

In a perfect worlid I could see the Cats unloading a lot of unused weight and Jax for Curry.

Maybe, Jax, Najera, Diop, and Collins

for Biedrins, Curry and Wright.

However, more realisticly I see something like this

Jax

Livingston

K. Brown

Diop

for

Biedrins

Curry

Wright

and you best believe Dell will be telling Jordan to make it happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cannot believe that I am reading some of this. If you are trading for Curry, you have to also trade DJ in the process.

If Curry and DJ were in the starting lineup, the Bobs would easily give up 105 pts a game.

Fans will many times ignore the defensive shortcomings of a roster tweak in the hopes of a slightly improved offensive output. That's exactly what this move would be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Exactly, like Hill he is just an athlete that happens to be able to throw the ball.  I’m sure, with some reps and time, he could catch just fine.  That’s why I said “and catch” Taysom Hill has beat the poo out of us and many other teams during the SP years.  If we had that!!!  Owe Mang!   Edit:  I’ll add this, 4th and 1 or 2 on the goal line?  We would get 6 points with that dude! Edit 2:  he may not now or ever be a QB1, but he can avg more than 6 yards per play
    • Eh that's debatable at the end of the day. Different schools of thought and whatnot. Generally teams are not overpaying RB's anymore and they don't need to. Most are signing mid-level FA's or drafting them. But they are still fairly important. We have seen one RB drafted in the top 10 in 2025 and an RB just went 3rd overall in the draft a few days ago. You can argue how wise that is but no team generally wants to give an FA RB a huge payday. Yes having a competent and if need be dominant running game is still an asset. The main thing that has changed is how teams invest.
    • Except we have him playing safety, so there's that.
×
×
  • Create New...