Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How would you feel if Bryce did this in 2025


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

Is this for the whole season or just after his benching?

Wasn't specified by the OP. Got the original tweet screen capped in the link above for what they had posted.

2 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

a little context would help if you are going to keep posting that

 

I thought that the one other time I posted it explained it clearly and that the labels would help fill in any blanks (outside of exacts regarding the scope of the sample, of course). What part is giving you trouble?

Edited by Icege
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Icege said:

Wasn't specified by the OP. Got the original tweet screen capped in the link above for what they had posted.

 

I thought that the one other time I posted it explained it clearly and that the labels would help fill in any blanks (outside of exacts regarding the scope of the sample, of course). What part is giving you trouble?

That's crazy impressive if it's for the season.  I feel like it post benching which is still impressive.  Those first couple games can really swing things.  I'm eager to see how the offense looks this season in year 2 of DC's offense, same OL, and a new weapon in TMac.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

That's crazy impressive if it's for the season.  I feel like it post benching which is still impressive.  Those first couple games can really swing things.  I'm eager to see how the offense looks this season in year 2 of DC's offense, same OL, and a new weapon in TMac.  

It's a really just a weird anomaly of a stat IMO 

For example, Bryce essentially had the worst on target % in the NFL last year.   That stat wouldn't lead you to believe that was also true.

He throws shorter than almost the entire league on average.   He naturally plays a more risk adverse brand of football.  So despite bringing heaviest % of off target throws to anyone on that graph.....they aren't all that aggressive and he is missing into the sideline for example often, thus....aren't deemed "turnover worthy".  Which is fine.  It's smart football for us.  But it's also why the ceiling of everything is just so low. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

That's crazy impressive if it's for the season.  I feel like it post benching which is still impressive.  Those first couple games can really swing things.  I'm eager to see how the offense looks this season in year 2 of DC's offense, same OL, and a new weapon in TMac.  

Got to pick up little dude from school in a minute, but once I get back if I have time I'll see if I can figure out which via the data points. I was leaning towards post-benching but I figured that'd be called out somewhere if so.

Edited by Icege
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, CRA said:

It's a really just a weird anomaly of a stat IMO 

For example, Bryce essentially had the worst on target % in the NFL last year.   That stat wouldn't lead you to believe that was also true.

He throws shorter than almost the entire league on average.   He naturally plays a more risk adverse brand of football.  So despite bringing heaviest % of off target throws to anyone on that graph.....they aren't all that aggressive and he is missing into the sideline for example often thus....aren't deemed "turnover worthy".  Which is fine.  It's smart football for us.  But it's also why the ceiling of everything is just so low. 

I think you are looking at the season and that stat has to be post benching. His first few games can change the averages by quite a bit as they were awful vs decent after the benching. Season totals will paint a bleak picture while game by game and year end trends can give us some hope. Throw in year 2 of the same offense, same OL, plus TMac and we should expect some improvements overall. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Icege said:

Wasn't specified by the OP. Got the original tweet screen capped in the link above for what they had posted.

 

I thought that the one other time I posted it explained it clearly and that the labels would help fill in any blanks (outside of exacts regarding the scope of the sample, of course). What part is giving you trouble?

Is this the entire season?

Is this completions?

What defines big time throws?

 

I mean it's a pretty arbitrary and meaningless "stat" in the grand scheme of things 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I think you are looking at the season and that stat has to be post benching. His first few games can change the averages by quite a bit as they were awful vs decent after the benching. Season totals will paint a bleak picture while game by game and year end trends can give us some hope. Throw in year 2 of the same offense, same OL, plus TMac and we should expect some improvements overall. 

93% of his pass attempts last year are post benching to final game (starting with Denver). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Is this the entire season?

Is this completions?

What defines big time throws?

 

I mean it's a pretty arbitrary and meaningless "stat" in the grand scheme of things 

It's a subjective stat that PFF made up. https://www.pff.com/news/pro-pff-qb-grading-most-effective-tool-there-is

Quote

In its simplest terms, a big-time throw is on the highest end of both difficulty and value. While the value is easy to see statistically, the difficulty has more to do with passes that have a lower completion percentage the further the ball is thrown down the field. Therefore, the big-time throw is best described as a pass with excellent ball location and timing, generally thrown further down the field and/or into a tighter window.

 

Edited by PNW_PantherMan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Is this the entire season?

Is this completions?

What defines big time throws?

 

I mean it's a pretty arbitrary and meaningless "stat" in the grand scheme of things 

my understanding is a big time throw, could be a 5-10 yard slant to Adam Thielen given AT isn't going to separate. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Is this the entire season?

Is this completions?

What defines big time throws?

 

I mean it's a pretty arbitrary and meaningless "stat" in the grand scheme of things 

Are you trying to have a good faith conversation or are you just being dismissive?

More than willing to explore further if the former, but from your quip at the end there it seems like the latter.

I don't think that you'd just dismiss something because it doesn't support your argument, but just in case lmk pls kthx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Icege said:

Are you trying to have a good faith conversation or are you just being dismissive?

More than willing to explore further if the former, but from your quip at the end there it seems like the latter.

I don't think that you'd just dismiss something because it doesn't support your argument, but just in case lmk pls kthx

and yet you didnt answer one of those questions

The "big time throw" stat just seems like something made up from PFF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

and yet you didnt answer one of those questions

The "big time throw" stat just seems like something made up from PFF

Based on their definition, basically 90% of well placed balls to Adam Theilen would count as a big time throws.  Because all those are tight windows.  That’s where I think the definition is muddy in terms of what they do and don’t count.   Probably would help figure it out if we had a game and the number of throws they award him to get an idea of what does and doesn’t count 
 

a pass with high difficulty and value, often characterized by excellent ball location and timing, typically thrown further downfield or into a tighter window

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...