Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bengals exploring quarterback options


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

According to Bengals.com writer Geoff Hobson, while the team has publicly taken a hard line stance on Carson Palmer's trade demands, behind the scenes they're "kicking the tires" on all options and taking a close look at the top QBs in the draft.

Sounds like they've come to an "oh crap, he really means it" moment in Cincinnati.

Still not sure a simple pick swap would be enough to net Palmer, but it's starting to sound like it might not be as farfetched as I would have thought.

(all dependent on the CBA, of course)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh. Some mocks had the Bengals taking a QB before Palmer's announcement... so not really surprised. Many people this year had said that their plan was to draft a new guy and have him sit behind Palmer for another two years or so.

Not too surprised they're doing this, but maybe they'll get an itchy trigger finger :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh. Some mocks had the Bengals taking a QB before Palmer's announcement... so not really surprised. Many people this year had said that their plan was to draft a new guy and have him sit behind Palmer for another two years or so.

Not too surprised they're doing this, but maybe they'll get an itchy trigger finger :)

When Boomer Esaiason wanted out, they drafted David Klingler in the first and let Esaiason go the following year.

It's possible they could speed up the process this time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

getting palmer for a year or two would be a waste. don't want any part of that deal....esp. at the amount he's supposed to be getting paid.

dude is old and he's got a bum arm.

we shouldn't get any QB who doesn't have a chance at being the fulltime, long term starter for us. anything less than that is just us spinning our wheels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If (and that is a Big IF) the coaching staff think that Clausen could be developed into a franchsie QB, picking up a vet like Palmer for a few years could be very appealing to them.

Damn....I really have no idea what this team is going to do in the draft of FA. The change in coaching philosophy has us all guessing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If (and that is a Big IF) the coaching staff think that Clausen could be developed into a franchsie QB, picking up a vet like Palmer for a few years could be very appealing to them.

yup, especially if it grants them extra picks than just the Bengals' #1.

It also allows the team time to work through Clausen in camp and see what he has with a new coach and new system, while having a reliable player that should be able to keep you competitive if you don't ask him to do too much and if the defense is solid. Big "ifs", of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...