Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Bringing in Newton for Visit


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

http://blogs.charlotte.com/panthers/

BOO YAH!

Most notably: A “few” of the 8-10 players the Panthers are targeting for their No. 1 pick are quarterbacks.

Rivera spoke glowingly of former Auburn quarterback Cam Newton, whom the Panthers plan to bring to Charlotte for a private visit. Other quarterback prospects also will be flown in, although Rivera did not specify which ones.

Rivera compared the 6-6, 250-pound Newton to several first-round quarterbacks who have had success.

“You look at the size of these guys. They're all big men. You look at Ben Roethlisberger, a Matt Ryan, a Joe Flacco. Cam's got those types of physical attributes,” Rivera said.

“He's a tall, powerful young man. He's got great athletic ability. He might be the better athlete of all of them (current QB prospects). But again, the one thing he does have is he's got a great arm. And he's a winner. You go back to his junior college and his college days, you can't pass that up, either. We've got to explore. There's eight, 9, 10 guys that we're looking at. We're going to explore all avenues with everybody.”

Rivera said the need for a franchise quarterback was part of his discussions with general manager Marty Hurney when Rivera was interviewing for the job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have a thread on this interview already, perhaps a merger is in order? or a subject change for the other thread and merger into this one?

http://reederstake.freedomblogging.com/2011/02/24/rivera-addresses-questions-about-no-1-pick-at-nfl-scouting-combines/8491/ has the full transcript, which is slightly less newton-favorable than the quips by the reporters, since he tends to stress looking at multiple players over and over.

Clear they like Newton's physical stats though, which is no surprise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marty Hurney and John Fox took LenDale White out to dinner just to talk privately to him...then drafted DeAngelo Williams.

Getting excited over pre-draft talk and shenanigans is kind of like getting hyped listening to your sister tell you about the blind date she set you up with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want us to draft cam newton too but almost 60% of the questions dealt with Cam Newton. Ron Rivera is not John Fox and answers questions much more honestly and open which is why u heard his name more. I doubt he would have brought his name up as much if most of the questions werent about him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

exactly, Salty.

There is a good chance he's the top QB they're looking at, but I caution everyone who wants him to not get too excited, because there is way too much time in the process left. He simply answers the questions put to him - and in a way to let other teams know if they want Cam Newton, they better consider the fact he may be gone even at #2. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Frank, I feel like you do regarding this receiver thing at the end of the day. Yeah, investing in young receivers is the way to go in most situations. But, vets have their place. It just depends upon the team's individual situation and goals and the perceived value of the player and contract. It seems to me that at this point you're just going on about nothing in terms of Adam Thielen. It's neither that serious or important. In my opinion, our receiving corps can make good with him or without him. I don't think we'll be cutting any youngster with promise for AT if it comes down to that. But right now he's still a pretty decent value. 
    • Sure, I agree with you to some extent. But a lot of us put our bodies and very lives on the line in necessary jobs (remember Covid). And I realize that opens up another real can of worms and questions that won't be answered here, but when the "failure" rate is somewhere around 50 percent, and the median length of a career for a second rounder is four years (per Google AI), is it really fair for them to make millions? Does it really make sense from a purely business perspective? I realize that the question is very much loaded, but at some point we must ponder these questions from all perspectives.
    • Thielen got hurt and only played ten games last season but had 62 targets. That's 6 targets a game over the course of 17 games that would have been 105 targets. That would have put him well ahead of Xavier Legette who led our receivers in targets with 84. For comparison sake David Moore played all 17 games and only had 57 targets. We've been overvaluing Thielen in the passing game the last two years any way you cut it.
×
×
  • Create New...