Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Drafting X is like the poster board for mistakes. Hopefully, lesson learned.


TD alt
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, csx said:

The guy was extrapolating his best career game to a year of stats to say hes a 1400 yard guy. But we have real stats to look at. 

I missed that nugget. What was the context?

I ask because I can’t imagine anyone seriously thinks he is gonna get 92 yards each week. As the number two in a Bryce led run first offense? Lol no. Half that maybe. 

17 x 92 doesn’t add up anyway. You remember where in the timeline he said that? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, strato said:

I missed that nugget. What was the context?

I ask because I can’t imagine anyone seriously thinks he is gonna get 92 yards each week. As the number two in a Bryce led run first offense? Lol no. Half that maybe. 

17 x 92 doesn’t add up anyway. You remember where in the timeline he said that? 

He was just being willfully ignorant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, strato said:

I missed that nugget. What was the context?

I ask because I can’t imagine anyone seriously thinks he is gonna get 92 yards each week. As the number two in a Bryce led run first offense? Lol no. Half that maybe. 

17 x 92 doesn’t add up anyway. You remember where in the timeline he said that? 

The context was that because of his good game that meant he will do that every week.

I hope he does but he has not thus far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, strato said:

okay I didn’t hear it last night and I turned the captions on and scrolled through the video twice. With no luck seeing 1400 yards go by. 
Do you remember where in the timeline it was that he said that?  

Hey, I'm lost, and I sure as hell don't feel like listening to a vid of conjecture and projection based on one game, but...Even if dude didn't come right out and say it, if he's saying that X can have those types of games more than not, he's basically saying it. Just curious as to why you have to hear it explicitly. 

My thing is is that a 1000 yards has been kind of the benchmark for receivers by fans and analysts for at least two decades now (though I could argue that we probably need to set a higher expectation). That being said, all a receiver has to do across 17 games is average approximately 59 receiving yards per game.  I don't think that's an insurmountable height to reach even for a WR2 in many offenses.  In one of these threads, someone was saying X has averaged 29. That's an unacceptable number. Bless him if he can average 92, because he'd be getting more than 1500 (going on 1600) per season. Why someone would think he'd be able to do that under Bryce and a team that needs to run, I don't know. Maybe I do need to listen to the vid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, TD alt said:

Hey, I'm lost, and I sure as hell don't feel like listening to a vid of conjecture and projection based on one game, but...Even if dude didn't come right out and say it, if he's saying that X can have those types of games more than not, he's basically saying it. Just curious as to why you have to hear it explicitly. 

My thing is is that a 1000 yards has been kind of the benchmark for receivers by fans and analysts for at least two decades now (though I could argue that we probably need to set a higher expectation). That being said, all a receiver has to do across 17 games is average approximately 59 receiving yards per game.  I don't think that's an insurmountable height to reach even for a WR2 in many offenses.  In one of these threads, someone was saying X has averaged 29. That's an unacceptable number. Bless him if he can average 92, because he'd be getting more than 1500 (going on 1600) per season. Why someone would think he'd be able to do that under Bryce and a team that needs to run, I don't know. Maybe I do need to listen to the vid.

Having Bryce as a QB is a hindrance to a reciever like XL.  Andy comes in and suddenly he's capable.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, TD alt said:

Hey, I'm lost, and I sure as hell don't feel like listening to a vid of conjecture and projection based on one game, but...Even if dude didn't come right out and say it, if he's saying that X can have those types of games more than not, he's basically saying it. Just curious as to why you have to hear it explicitly. 

My thing is is that a 1000 yards has been kind of the benchmark for receivers by fans and analysts for at least two decades now (though I could argue that we probably need to set a higher expectation). That being said, all a receiver has to do across 17 games is average approximately 59 receiving yards per game.  I don't think that's an insurmountable height to reach even for a WR2 in many offenses.  In one of these threads, someone was saying X has averaged 29. That's an unacceptable number. Bless him if he can average 92, because he'd be getting more than 1500 (going on 1600) per season. Why someone would think he'd be able to do that under Bryce and a team that needs to run, I don't know. Maybe I do need to listen to the vid.

How many reasons do I need to suit you? I want to know (why I asked). Did I ask you to check it for me? I don’t think so. 
I guess bottom line is I didn’t hear it and I don’t want to call someone out in error, say he didn’t, so I wanted to check it. 

In the ‘classless’ thread just a little while ago a guy claimed that there were two pages of someone calling another guy a liar and being obtuse. I looked. It was THREE posts before he made that claim. 3. 
 

As far as XL being capable or… of that standard for that kind of production, technically if he did it once he can do it again… but I certainly don’t expect that and also did not infer that it was an expectation from what the dude was saying. Did you watch the video and get that? 

 

I know the 1000 yard deal, and that is a benchmark yes. If you were looking at this offense and this quarterback would you expect Legette to go 1000? I think a little under would be reasonable with so many targets going to the RBs and a run first mentality and all that. 

Couple/three games ago 10 guys caught balls. How many are there really going to be every week for  XL? 

 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, strato said:

How many reasons do I need to suit you? I want to know. Did I ask you to check it for me? I don’t think so. 
I don’t want to call someone out in error, so I wanted to check it. 

In the ‘classless’ thread just a little while ago a guy claimed that there were two pages of someone calling another guy a liar and being obtuse. I looked. It was THREE posts before he made that claim. 3. 
 

As far as XL being capable or… of that standard for that kind of production, technically if he did it once he can do it again… but I certainly don’t expect that and also did not infer that it was an expectation from what the dude was saying. Did you watch the video and get that? 

 

I know the 1000 yard deal, and that is a benchmark yes. If you were looking at this offense and this quarterback would you expect Legette to go 1000? I think a little under would be reasonable with so many targets going to the RBs and a run first mentality and all that. Couple of the

Couple/three games ago 10 guys caught balls. How many are there really going to be every week for  XL? 

 

Suit me? It's a forum. No offense meant if that's the way to took it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

Having Bryce as a QB is a hindrance to a reciever like XL.  Andy comes in and suddenly he's capable.  

I said something like that last week and got post after post of stats telling me I didn’t see it. And was accused of being racist to boot. Because Dalton is white (I can’t make him black, sorry). 

 

1 minute ago, TD alt said:

Suit me? It's a forum. No offense meant if that's the way to took it. 

Thanks. It seemed like you objected to me asking. So I am sorry if you didn’t mean it that way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

Having Bryce as a QB is a hindrance to a reciever like XL.  Andy comes in and suddenly he's capable.  

I think he's an impediment to any receiver because he rarely hits a receiver in stride, but X would certainly benefit if he is hit in stride because it takes him a while to get going. He may be fast, but he's not quick, and he's not really twitchy either. 

I'm just glad that Bryce looked his way for a change. I don't think we'll have that problem with Dalton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Agreed. I actually asked Chat GTP why are centers so important to the O-line. You'll find their response interesting. The center is absolutely critical to the offensive line, even though he rarely gets the spotlight. Here’s why: 🧠 1. He’s the “quarterback” of the offensive line The center identifies the defensive front before the snap — calling out who the “Mike” linebacker is and setting protection assignments for the guards and tackles. He adjusts the blocking scheme based on shifts, stunts, and blitz looks. In most offenses, the QB and center share communication responsibilities, but the center’s call is often what the rest of the line follows. 🗣️ Without a smart, communicative center, the whole line can fall apart under pressure or disguise. 🏗️ 2. He’s central to blocking coordination The center is literally the pivot point — coordinating combo blocks, zone steps, and double-teams with both guards. In zone-blocking schemes, he’s essential for lateral movement, reading the defensive tackle’s leverage, and passing off blocks smoothly. A poor center can destroy run-game timing or allow penetration that blows up plays before they start. ⚙️ 3. He handles some of the toughest matchups Centers face nose tackles — often the biggest, strongest player on the defense — directly over the ball. He has to snap accurately, then instantly anchor against 300+ lbs of power, often with one hand still finishing the snap motion. That’s one of the most technically demanding jobs in football. 🧩 4. He ties the line together mentally and physically The center’s ability to recognize stunts, delayed blitzes, and coverage disguises helps the entire line stay in sync. If a guard or tackle makes a mistake, the center can often help bail them out through quick adjustment calls or recovery blocks. A great center also brings leadership and stability — think of guys like Jason Kelce, Travis Frederick, or Alex Mack — they elevated everyone around them. 🔍 5. Why some teams don’t draft centers early Despite the importance, centers rarely go in Round 1 because their positional value (impact on points/wins per dollar or cap hit) is lower than QB, LT, Edge, or CB. But analytically, a great center can add similar efficiency gains to a good left tackle by reducing QB pressure and improving run-game consistency. 🟩 In short:
    • This is true. Except when it isn’t. I mean he is not consistent.  He does a lot of the same stuff he was soing in 2023. Hate to say it but I see it.  That is what I mean by internalized. It is not ingrained in him and he randomly goes back to his bad stuff - gets rattled or something. Over something. I don’t t know what triggers it but it all juat flies away and you have the plqykng scared afraid to get hit Bryce. Bails early. The failure footwork comes back, the whole deal.  That is why we have to hope he plays all the games so we can document where he really is at.  
    • easier question:  With the numbers I just listed, in his 3rd year, what is there to support?  What do you see that we arent seeing?
×
×
  • Create New...