Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Not Necessarily Panthers Related but....


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Basbear said:

Tossing in another ______ in this piece. Most QBs picked in the first are going to terrible teams(Especially the top ten).

 

QBs picked in the later rounds get their odds of success increased by landing on iggles or chiefs. 

 

Hence why I placed Joe Burrow sooo high on my list. Maybe the best DC in NFL history agrees- https://www.cincinnati.com/story/sports/nfl/bengals/2025/07/09/steve-spagnuolo-joe-burrow-is-second-best-nfl-quarterback-to-patrick-mahomes-chiefs-bengals/84514443007/

 

 

Wins, putting up numbers while limiting your TOs on a bad team, that's the impossible feat. 

Maybe try to fit Joes early years into this formula, if the formula is sound, Joe should be in the top 5% if not the top. 

I am confused by what you are asking. Also, the preliminary resulta of the model don't bear out that later round picks have a higher success rate.

Remember, I am not ranking QB's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

Right.  That’s why I’m not gonna go any farther with it.

Yeah, grading individual players and "success" level is harder, IMO. 

I could always do an average based on career AV and then create something based on that. That might be interesting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, grading individual players and "success" level is harder, IMO. 

I could always do an average based on career AV and then create something based on that. That might be interesting. 

I like the original premise.  Is there a way to weight the stats/accolades based on draft position?  Kind of like S-F tiers?

Example Tom Brady would be S-tier based on his production while being a 6th rounder, but Peyton Manning would end up being A or B tier for production but was drafted top of the 1st.

Does that make sense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, L-TownCat said:

I like the original premise.  Is there a way to weight the stats/accolades based on draft position?  Kind of like S-F tiers?

Example Tom Brady would be S-tier based on his production while being a 6th rounder, but Peyton Manning would end up being A or B tier for production but was drafted top of the 1st.

Does that make sense?

I could do an average or a weighted distribution for each round. I would want to use something like Career AV or similar to do that. It's a little more straightforward. 

I am generally wanting to keep it as a "round based" thing because I want to ultimately use it to gauge when/where to draft QB's based on results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/30/2025 at 6:25 PM, kungfoodude said:

I am confused by what you are asking. Also, the preliminary resulta of the model don't bear out that later round picks have a higher success rate.

Remember, I am not ranking QB's.

I was trying to ask you to included Joe Burrow. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The hell happened to our Te's...I gigured Evans would get a biggercroke coming off the bye week? Sanders?? He might need to put that weight back on. He's been about as underwhelming as Wonnum. And Tremble looks nothing like he used to btw.  Xavier in the top 5? Nah...Moton in the top 5? Pretty sure I saw him getting beat multiple times 3rd/4th qtr.   
    • I agree 100%.  Just to add, ANYONE that wants to sign BY to some 300+ million nightmare/contract, they can kick rocks first.  Like you said, brad adds nothing. This is war, just bring in a bright forward thinking OC that's going to come up with new plays and ........a fing game plan to beat a 1-8 or 3-10 team...... challenge the defense to defend every blade of grass and evolve this team.... By my eyes Dave is just another Ron Fox wilks 4.2 with his only success being if the score is low and able to run enough...(minus one game.) fug that, thats another big issue, Im just sick of the coach hires, its too many since Rhule.  Dave has earned the right to stay, but.......If Dave doesn't want his pilates lover to go be a video assistant for underdawg or whatever betting site that gives him a salary. Peace out bro....
    • If it were that simple, Reich and Canales would have already done it. The next HC would have the same happen. If Canales is gone, I wouldn't be surprised if Tepper elevates Evero to keep him around with Bryce, Tremble and Chuba as agreed upon long term offensive pieces. I believe Reich and Canales would have gone different directions at QB and DC if they were allowed. Wilks even made it known this organization doesn't make the HC the primary partner in personnel decisions. Before the HC even gets a chance it likely goes Nicole > David > Dan > Brandt > Eric > Benjamin 1 > Benjamin 2 > HC I highly doubt hanging the HC wouldn't fix all the problems over his head.
×
×
  • Create New...