Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Not Necessarily Panthers Related but....


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Basbear said:

Tossing in another ______ in this piece. Most QBs picked in the first are going to terrible teams(Especially the top ten).

 

QBs picked in the later rounds get their odds of success increased by landing on iggles or chiefs. 

 

Hence why I placed Joe Burrow sooo high on my list. Maybe the best DC in NFL history agrees- https://www.cincinnati.com/story/sports/nfl/bengals/2025/07/09/steve-spagnuolo-joe-burrow-is-second-best-nfl-quarterback-to-patrick-mahomes-chiefs-bengals/84514443007/

 

 

Wins, putting up numbers while limiting your TOs on a bad team, that's the impossible feat. 

Maybe try to fit Joes early years into this formula, if the formula is sound, Joe should be in the top 5% if not the top. 

I am confused by what you are asking. Also, the preliminary resulta of the model don't bear out that later round picks have a higher success rate.

Remember, I am not ranking QB's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, grading individual players and "success" level is harder, IMO. 

I could always do an average based on career AV and then create something based on that. That might be interesting. 

I like the original premise.  Is there a way to weight the stats/accolades based on draft position?  Kind of like S-F tiers?

Example Tom Brady would be S-tier based on his production while being a 6th rounder, but Peyton Manning would end up being A or B tier for production but was drafted top of the 1st.

Does that make sense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, L-TownCat said:

I like the original premise.  Is there a way to weight the stats/accolades based on draft position?  Kind of like S-F tiers?

Example Tom Brady would be S-tier based on his production while being a 6th rounder, but Peyton Manning would end up being A or B tier for production but was drafted top of the 1st.

Does that make sense?

I could do an average or a weighted distribution for each round. I would want to use something like Career AV or similar to do that. It's a little more straightforward. 

I am generally wanting to keep it as a "round based" thing because I want to ultimately use it to gauge when/where to draft QB's based on results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/30/2025 at 6:25 PM, kungfoodude said:

I am confused by what you are asking. Also, the preliminary resulta of the model don't bear out that later round picks have a higher success rate.

Remember, I am not ranking QB's.

I was trying to ask you to included Joe Burrow. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...