Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

All aboard the Patrick Peterson orchestra-train?!?!?


SorthNarolina

Recommended Posts

Sorry to make a single thread for one player but I just gotta officially come out and proclaim I'm probably going to be on the orchestra-train.

There are just so many wonderful reasons:

1. Most overall positional rankings I've seen have him as the best player available. BPA yay!

2. We have a hole at CB with no young talent that could possibly develop into a starter. Richard Marshall was a very good nickelback that should have stayed there. Captain is the same. I really liked them as nickelbacks but not as a full time starter. WR and DE has talent that has shown promise.

3. No off field red flags or questionable intangibles.

4. Very, very good measurables. While some positions in the draft have guys hoping they can somehow gain ground on those ranked above them, the combine simply widens the gap between Peterson and his peers. It's rare that the top rated guy is also one of the most physically impressive.

I really like that he's bigger because I've grown tired of watching the smaller Richard Marshall work in sneaky PI moves where he basically mugs the other guy. It worked sometimes but I'd rather just have a bigger guy on the outside.

5. He was a very highly rated prospect out of highschool and he lived up to the hype in college almost immediately. Maybe he'll make the next jump as smoothly.

6. There are fun immature puns and innuendo you can make with the Panthers having the #1 pick and his initials being PP. "When we go No. 1, you better be sure it's PP". teehee.

7. We may be able to trade down and still draft him.

8. He has return skills and is enthusiastic about other ST duties.

9. He's potentially better than most of the FA options. He's potentially another Asomugha.

10. With the new cap he will not be all that expensive which would enable use to retain more of the FAs. With the adjusted rookie cap, more vets get the money. So signing a vet instead of a rookie now has a more concrete chance of spending more money even at #1.

Drafting somebody in order retain the players we drafted just screams "Build through the Draft". It ties in perfectly with the Hurney JR plan.

11. The panthers have drafted more Chuck Bednarik winners than anybody else(Morgan, Peppers, Connor). So keep up the tradition.

12. He's not a one year wonder. People are comparing Fairley to Ndamukong Suh but Suh was not in danger of being a one year wonder. Same goes for Bowers.

13. The orchestra train has two conductors.

I think that's all i might have more. There are always cons too, but he has the least cons and the most pros out of anybody else. I think Dareus could fit a good amount of these too. But I'm going with PP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree there is a hole to fill but it isn't as big as the others. I guess you can count me in, I've come to the conclusion Green or Peterson are the only picks I would be thrilled about, pure BPA. I'd be o-k with Fairley, Newton, Bowers and Dareus, but not exactly thrilled.

Biggest reasons why I like Peterson is is seems like a long-term player because he stays healthy and is tough and of coarse plays a position which can be filled for years by the same player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peterson is my first choice. However, I don't have a problem with anyone else if thats what the coaches want.

Yeah I feel the same way too. Only guy I probably really would feel nervous and skeptical of would be Nick Fairley. If Rivera, Hurney, and JR approve of him though I doubt he can be that bad. Even with the whole Peppers PR disaster he still worked out a lot better than many other #1 picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I feel the same way too. Only guy I probably really would feel nervous and skeptical of would be Nick Fairley. If Rivera, Hurney, and JR approve of him though I doubt he can be that bad. Even with the whole Peppers PR disaster he still worked out a lot better than many other #1 picks.

Same here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen him at the top of more scouts big boards than any other player and have yet to see outside the top 5 on anyone's list. Great talent, great intangibles, work ethic, leadership, a hell of a return man to boot. It's really hard to find any holes in his game and he really hasn't even hit his peak yet. The only real negative is the position value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been aboard the Patrick Peterson bandwagon from the beginning. A lot of people say CB is a reach at #1, but who cares? There will probably be a rookie wage scale anyways so that's a non-factor. Experts are saying he has potential to be the next true shutdown corner like Revis/Aso.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PP7. Count me in. The more I read on prospects, the more I'm enamored by PP and Green. If Gamble can bounce back to form, with our young FAST safeties and Meeks running the DB show, our back 7 will be downright nasty. Plug in a FA DT or a 3rd rd DT and our line will perform just fine. Who knows, maybe Irvin will finally develop into a real DT and corrupt the pocket like he promised he would do! But for real, i'd be exctatic if we chose PP7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You look at the Jets and Packers, having elite CBs allows you to leave those guys on one-on-one islands for most of the game and go blitz crazy. That way you don't rely so heavily on just your DLine for pressure. I know they're different schemes but still.

PP7

Aggressively pursue a top DT FA (Cofield, Mebane)

Resign CJ, Sign/Extend our backers (Anderson, TDavis, Beason)

Few depth pieces here and there

With the new coaching staff this could easily be a top 5 defense

Bring in a franchise QB next draft which looks really good for QBs and you go from worst in the league to playoff contender in 2-3 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...