Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Just wanted to pop in


The Question
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Dave Gettleman's Shorts said:

can't let an undrafted RB on a 1 year deal steal the spotlight on MNF

It was about showcasing Bryce and Canales offensive genius mind to the world

well, he all but indicated that in his press conference   He wanted his passing offense to ‘come alive’ 

however, there  where so many mistakes on offense besides Bryce, per film review done by some podcasters I respect in the All 22  

Young, missing reads, throwing off his back foot continuously, late with throws    We are in year 3….enough

receivers and Young thinking it’s one route and it was another 

Tet dropping critical passes…I’ll tell ya, I’m over this one.  Top 10 pick, pretend you are Malik neighbors or Jefferson and catch the damned ball

…and the ever so popular Legette, ballerina that he is, stepping out of bounds,,again

they need a veteran receiver out there and they don’t have it…I get the concept of wanting young and the receivers to grow together but young has to grow first, and it is ending year 3   One thing about Thielen, he was always where he was supposed to be, he seldom dropped passes and he had no problem keeping his feet in bounds 

What these guys do in practice together, no idea 

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Letting Bryce “prove it again” was the best way to eliminate any confusion for people thinking Bryce is the answer after the previous game. It shouldn’t be needed, but for some reason it was. This finally made the media buy in on what most of us already knew. So, while the game was terrible, this is the one strong positive coming out of it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, The Question said:

I mean this is just meaningless to me. What a worthless comparison. 

How so?  You are trying to say that DC is an idiot for only running Rico seven times as if that contributed to losing the game.  DC tried to do exactly what the Rams did with great success.  The difference isn’t the RB, coach or game plan.  Give you 3 guess what the difference really is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am gonna believe it wasn’t us if the 4th round pick price is accurate. We needed 225 points to get from 19 to their pick. 875 at 19 to 1100 at 14.  Our 2026 4th was valued at 56 points I think. A future 4th has less value. So that wasn’t close to enough.    It would have taken our third and our fourth. Comes within a point of even.    Now, moving to their spot in the second round we could have done but after Miami took Rodriguez why would we? 
    • Yep,and Blake Miller have had more experiences than Freeling,Lions did not sigh a vet T like Walker,so they had to pick Miller.
    • I mean it's expected.  This is the NBA.  And they hate the Charlotte Hornets.  Flagg was also the guy "magically" given to the Mavs who lost Luca to the wildly popular Lakers.  Was always an uphill battle.  But the award is BS since it's not voted on before play-in starts. Kon probably lost because of the play-in as many people switched votes.  It was a regular season award, so this is some nonsense.  Kon also didn't have the luxury of taking 10 games off to rest up injuries like Flagg did.  If he did, he wouldn't have been nursing his back the last month.  I mean, screw him for being on an actual playoff team that matters.  Flagg took tons of shots a game, he was wildly inefficient.  Kon was a huge reason the Hornets made the play-in and turned the season around after Jan.   I think Flagg will probably be the better player long term, or at least the most impact.  But Kon should have won ROTY.
×
×
  • Create New...