Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Case for(or Against) Drafting/Signing a TE


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I felt like he did a good job fixing the issues from the first Saints game, for example. Although I admit mid second half it did kind of feel like he was going back to old tendencies. 

I don't know how you can say he did a good job fixing issues. He doesn't even recognize issues in game. Situational awareness is one of the things he lacks. He's probably one of the least flexible coaches I've seen. We do the same thing over and over. Defending DC offense is pretty easy. Stack the box and make Bryce beat you. Either he will or he won't.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

I don't know how you can say he did a good job fixing issues. He doesn't even recognize issues in game. Situational awareness is one of the things he lacks. He's probably one of the least flexible coaches I've seen. We do the same thing over and over. Defending DC offense is pretty easy. Stack the box and make Bryce beat you. Either he will or he won't.

I was referring to changes that he made from one game to the next. 

In game is another story. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I felt like he did a good job fixing the issues from the first Saints game, for example. Although I admit mid second half it did kind of feel like he was going back to old tendencies. 

He basically is only able to make adjustments with at least a week of hindsight. He is completely clueless on the in game adjustments. Tremendously worse than guys like Fox or Rivera who were constantly criticized for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

He basically is only able to make adjustments with at least a week of hindsight. He is completely clueless on the in game adjustments. Tremendously worse than guys like Fox or Rivera who were constantly criticized for that.

Honestly DC needs a seasoned OC to call plays while he is still learning as a HC.  I do think he has some potential as a HC but I was hoping someone like McDaniels got fired from Miami so he could come here and call the offense.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

I somewhat suspect they view the group as "complete."

I doubt it.  JT was been a disappointment and I think they were banking on him developing.  The fact they are reliant on decent contributions from a late rounder in Evans is pretty telling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I felt like he did a good job fixing the issues from the first Saints game, for example. Although I admit mid second half it did kind of feel like he was going back to old tendencies. 

Fixing the issues from the first game was more so Bryce using his legs which I really wish he’d do more often but I’m also assuming his ankle is in pretty rough shape 

We couldn’t get much going in game 1 against the Saints and it wasn’t all that different game two. 

On the first drive Bryce scrambled for 15 on 3rd down extending that drive leading to a TD

On the FG drive in 2nd Quarter Bryce extended a 4th down play completing a pass to TMac for 21 yards 

And then second half/old tendencies Canales really starts coaching scared with a lead. Which leaves the margin for error on any drive literally zero

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

He basically is only able to make adjustments with at least a week of hindsight. He is completely clueless on the in game adjustments. Tremendously worse than guys like Fox or Rivera who were constantly criticized for that.

Two weeks in the case of that game... 

From what I've seen, Canales is at least capable of learning from his mistakes. That's a plus, at least. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Honestly DC needs a seasoned OC to call plays while he is still learning as a HC.  I do think he has some potential as a HC but I was hoping someone like McDaniels got fired from Miami so he could come here and call the offense.  

I don't think DC would bring in someone who is already a more successful HC and also a far, far, FAR more impressive offensive coach. He is gonna view that as a potential job threat, IMO. And that's outside the lack of established prior coaching staff relationship.

I think if you see DC give up duties, it would be to Idzik.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I doubt it.  JT was been a disappointment and I think they were banking on him developing.  The fact they are reliant on decent contributions from a late rounder in Evans is pretty telling.

I think they may not view TE as very important. We will see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, *FreeFua* said:

Fixing the issues from the first game was more so Bryce using his legs which I really wish he’d do more often but I’m also assuming his ankle is in pretty rough shape 

We couldn’t get much going in game 1 against the Saints and it wasn’t all that different game two. 

On the first drive Bryce scrambled for 15 on 3rd down extending that drive leading to a TD

On the FG drive in 2nd Quarter Bryce extended a 4th down play completing a pass to TMac for 21 yards 

And then second half/old tendencies Canales really starts coaching scared with a lead. Which leaves the margin for error on any drive literally zero

He did use a more balanced approach (at least in the early part of the game) and called some of the plays that he should have been calling the first time when we were facing heavy pressure. I give him credit for that.

There are most definitely issues that need fixing though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Two weeks in the case of that game... 

From what I've seen, Canales is at least capable of learning from his mistakes. That's a plus, at least. 

I don't think it's helpful in that it takes weeks for it to sometimes happen. The NFL isn't a league for slow learners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

I don't think it's helpful in that it takes weeks for it to sometimes happen. The NFL isn't a league for slow learners.

No, and that was an issue we hadwith Rivera. We used to joke about making a list of all of the things Rivera learned too late. 

I'm still cautiously optimistic about Canales at the moment, but we'll see.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...