Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Maycock suggests we take a QB


teeray

Recommended Posts

Since you guys have been loving Mike Maycock so much.

He just said "At number one you have to decide if Jimmy Clausen is our franchise QB. Because if he is not we got to take one at number one."

You guys have been loving Mike Maycock lately so since he just said that you guys finally ready to draft the QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Couldn't imagine a worse year to have QB questions for a franchise at #1. Our owner is running the show at the CBA talks for the owners and would have pretty damn good incite on whether there is football in '11 or not. With the draft order staying the same in '12, we would be in line to take Luck, who is lightyears better than this years' crop of QB's. We could go Fairley, Green, Dareus, Patterson this year and get a true franchise QB in 2012. Kinda hard to gamble in April of 2011, but that has to be in play somewhat I would think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IF you don't think Jimmy is the guy.

However, he has Gabbert and Locker rated ahead of Newton.

Do I agree? No neccesarily, but I still respect his opinion.

I get Gabbert. I don't agree, but I get it. But until he moves Locker down I can't take him too seriously when it comes to evaluating QB's. He is great across the board. But with QB having listened to him over the last several years I don't have the same trust with him as other positions.

He will adjust his rankings. He has been very hostile toward Cam. Not critical but hostile toward Cam recently. Ever since his media workout. It has gotten to the point where his co-workers are now scared to discuss him and he is qualifying everything Cam does. Maybe he will bring up Jamarcus Russell so he can beat off under his desk about it.

Just my opinion. Maybe since I am a "Nut Hugger" I am just sensitive :):)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get Gabbert. I don't agree, but I get it. But until he moves Locker down I can't take him too seriously when it comes to evaluating QB's. He is great across the board. But with QB having listened to him over the last several years I don't have the same trust with him as other positions.

He will adjust his rankings. He has been very hostile toward Cam. Not critical but hostile toward Cam recently. Ever since his media workout. It has gotten to the point where his co-workers are now scared to discuss him and he is qualifying everything Cam does. Maybe he will bring up Jamarcus Russell so he can beat off under his desk about it.

Just my opinion. Maybe since I am a "Nut Hugger" I am just sensitive :):)

Hostile? :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam jumps a 10' 6 and Maycock immeadiately is like " A GUY FELL IN THE GAUNTLET!!!" Eisen scared to talk about Newton bc Maycock stares him down every time he does.

LOL this is hilarious.

It is a little funny that you are so concerned, yes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hostile? :rolleyes:

No I like Maycock, but he constantly goes against what other experts says. Which is fine. I like the fact he makes his own decisions and doesn't follow the other guys. That is actually commendable.

Right now he has Dareus over Fairley, Quinn over Bowers, and Locker over Cam.

That in itself doesn't bother me.

What does bother me is when one of these pan out in his favor he goes out every year to tell everybody how he had it right and therefore he is the smartest.

He has discussed both Sam Bradford last year and Cam this year with the same fuggin story.

"Jamarcus Russell had the best workout that I have ever seen. But I said don't take him until the second round. I am so fuggin smart" He said that after Bradford and Cam. Like clockwork.

He was the only one who said that and he deserves credit for that. I just wish the one giving him credit for it wasn't himself every year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mayock is widely regarded as one of, if not the best in the business.

A lot of these guys are swayed by agents (Kiper) but he's not.

He's not always right, but he's well respected for a reason.

Not at the QB position IMO. He is great across the board. But I have seen him discuss the QB position the last several years and he doesn't impress me. this is a guy who gad Andre Woodsen as his number 2 QB in 2008 for a while in Matt Ryan's class. Had Brian Brohm, and Dennis Dickson ahead of Joe Flacco.

If he has Locker over Cam at this point. He has little credibility IMO. Locker was awful at the Senior Bowl. He is average on tape.

If he was great at this he would likely be making a lot more money than he is working at the NFL Network.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...