Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rams at Panthers predictions for Saturday

Jackson113.2
 Share

Recommended Posts

DIO84 Enthusiast

DIO84

Posted
Posted

If it wasnt raining, I'd say 41-13 Rams.  Since there will be rain, 27-10 Rams.  No way they let us upset them again.  I give us zero chance.  Like I said in another topic, I wish the Saints would've knocked us out and saved us the embarrassment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BrewerHouseBeer Collaborator

BrewerHouseBeer

Posted
Posted

I just hope we can stay competitive. I hope, but highly doubt we can beat them 2 times. If we make them earn it, and have a highlight or 2 on offense and/or defense, I'll be happy. Just entertain the fans and make this fun. Fun football is all we have been craving for years, and hopefully we are finally heading in that direction. Let's keep it a 1-2 score game.

Rams 27

Panthers 20

Being realistic. However, I gave us zero chance last time. Especially with the secondary missing key starters. I tried to give my tickets away, but ended up having to go. I had an absolute blast! Hopefully we can repeat that feeling. Rams have not looked good on the east coast this season.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jay Roosevelt Grand Master

Jay Roosevelt

Posted
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

34-23 Rams. Bryce stays. Canales stays. We're classic average Panthers again next season. Yawn. 

Bryce and Canales were always staying regardless of the result tomorrow or last week. We've just had by far the most successful season of the Tepper era.

Not a high bar, I grant you. But why would anyone think Tepper would fire the only coach or cut the only QB to take the team to the playoffs since he's owned it?

As much as some people here want one or both of them gone (and I agree with the Bryce criticism to an extent, not as much on the Canales hate) it was never realistically going to happen regardless of what side of the debate any of us come down on.

Oh, and "classic average Panthers" won't likely get us to .500 next year with that insane schedule.

Edited by Jay Roosevelt
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jay Roosevelt Grand Master

Jay Roosevelt

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, DIO84 said:

If it wasnt raining, I'd say 41-13 Rams.  Since there will be rain, 27-10 Rams.  No way they let us upset them again.  I give us zero chance.  Like I said in another topic, I wish the Saints would've knocked us out and saved us the embarrassment. 

So winning your division and making the playoffs is something to be embarrassed about now?

Who are we going to be embarrassed to see us lose? The fans of the 18 teams that didn't even make the playoffs?

GTF outta here with that bullshit.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Top Available FAs

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Yes, but those guys aren't depth guard signings, they're likely going to wait and see who has injuries or players under performing and then sign there. I also think that if Ickey really is going to be able to play at some point this year, that's where our guard depth comes from.  As if he gets to the point of being active, we'd then have 3 LT's on the roster with him, Freeling, and Walker, gotta think one of them not named Freeling gets kicked inside if needed.
    • WUnderhill
      Canes vs Vegas Gm 5 SCF 8PM

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      lol imagine being Hill and this is what your coach thinks about you replacing a guy giving up over 4 goals per game.
    • tukafan21
      Top Available FAs

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think Tyreek is a bad player to play with on the field, for sure not in the same way that Diggs is, as he's a cancer on the field with how he acts, and wouldn't take kindly to being 2nd fiddle behind T-Mac. It's that Tyreek is just a terrible person who realistically shouldn't even be in the NFL, his insane athletic ability is why his off field transgressions have been overlooked.  If he was a WR3, no team would have kept him around, it was only that he was a 1st ballot HOF level talent that kept him around. Just zero interest in having a person like that around our young WRs, that's really all it comes down to for me with him. Again, if we were true contenders this year, that changes things and I'd rather bring in the best possible players and hope it works out.  But they're trying to build something here and to do that, you need high quality people, not just great talent.
×
×
  • Create New...