Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rams at Panthers predictions for Saturday

Jackson113.2
 Share

Recommended Posts

DIO84 Enthusiast

DIO84

Posted
Posted

If it wasnt raining, I'd say 41-13 Rams.  Since there will be rain, 27-10 Rams.  No way they let us upset them again.  I give us zero chance.  Like I said in another topic, I wish the Saints would've knocked us out and saved us the embarrassment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BrewerHouseBeer Collaborator

BrewerHouseBeer

Posted
Posted

I just hope we can stay competitive. I hope, but highly doubt we can beat them 2 times. If we make them earn it, and have a highlight or 2 on offense and/or defense, I'll be happy. Just entertain the fans and make this fun. Fun football is all we have been craving for years, and hopefully we are finally heading in that direction. Let's keep it a 1-2 score game.

Rams 27

Panthers 20

Being realistic. However, I gave us zero chance last time. Especially with the secondary missing key starters. I tried to give my tickets away, but ended up having to go. I had an absolute blast! Hopefully we can repeat that feeling. Rams have not looked good on the east coast this season.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jay Roosevelt Grand Master

Jay Roosevelt

Posted
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

34-23 Rams. Bryce stays. Canales stays. We're classic average Panthers again next season. Yawn. 

Bryce and Canales were always staying regardless of the result tomorrow or last week. We've just had by far the most successful season of the Tepper era.

Not a high bar, I grant you. But why would anyone think Tepper would fire the only coach or cut the only QB to take the team to the playoffs since he's owned it?

As much as some people here want one or both of them gone (and I agree with the Bryce criticism to an extent, not as much on the Canales hate) it was never realistically going to happen regardless of what side of the debate any of us come down on.

Oh, and "classic average Panthers" won't likely get us to .500 next year with that insane schedule.

Edited by Jay Roosevelt
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jay Roosevelt Grand Master

Jay Roosevelt

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, DIO84 said:

If it wasnt raining, I'd say 41-13 Rams.  Since there will be rain, 27-10 Rams.  No way they let us upset them again.  I give us zero chance.  Like I said in another topic, I wish the Saints would've knocked us out and saved us the embarrassment. 

So winning your division and making the playoffs is something to be embarrassed about now?

Who are we going to be embarrassed to see us lose? The fans of the 18 teams that didn't even make the playoffs?

GTF outta here with that bullshit.

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By strato · Posted

      Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • outlaw4
      Dan had a great draft

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • 45catfan
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By 45catfan · Posted

      I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...