Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

JaMarcus Russell and Alex Smith killed it at their combines...


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

Well when they had him on the set at NFL Network, he impressed even Mayock. He asked Cam about the so called one read and go thing, and Cam said that he was doing the best he could to move the sticks for his team, and he would have done the same thing whether it was a pro style offense or the wing T. Everyone of them pretty much agreed that the problems he had today were easily fixable, and that the only question was how hard he was willing to work. Mayock even said he could be superman if he worked hard.

BTW, did anybody see how fast Cam's top speed was? They clocked him at over 22mph in about the last 10yds of his 40. Can you imagine trying to tackle a 250lb man coming at you at 22mph? That's freakin scary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe Mr Scot is saying you are saying the combine means nothing since the great hype didn't. or did, IDK who gives a poo.

Pretty much.

You previously had folks previously talking like the combine was going to be a coronation, and now all of a sudden it doesn't mean anything. Color me amused :lol:

My take on the combine (and the pro days) now is the same that it's always been, that being that workouts are just workouts. They don't show true in-game conditions, and thus game film is much more important.

There is a purpose for workouts, that being to help distinguish between guys that you have rated about the same based on game tape, but any team that rates a guy higher off a workout than they did based on game film is asking for a Mike Mamula.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rayzor, who are you lobbying for as the #1 draft pick?
i would be happy with newton, fairley, peterson, or aj green. all of those guys would be a huge improvement over what we have and would be huge helps to us in the long term.

newton is my favorite, but if we pick one of those other guys i would be happy. i do have faith that the panthers will pick the right guy so i'd be cool with whatever although there are possibilities that are supposedly being considered that i don't like right now...any QB who doesn't have the last name newton, i'm not thrilled about going with any DE becasue i think we are fine there and that DT was the problem. i'm not big on dareus mainly because i think fairley would help out more with us using a 3-4 a good bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i agree that the combine doesn't mean a whole lot except in dealing with fringe players. what went on at the combine today didn't effect that opinion at all, even though i don't think newton had all that bad of a day there.

game tape, background investigations, interviews, and the wonderlic are the big ones i look for. private workouts and visits with teams are also a good thing to help decide. coaches get to see more of what they want to look at there.

i think pro days can be good if a player has been struggling on certain things in the past and they want to show off what they have been working on and improved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow!!! This pissing contest is fun and all, but Jebus can't we all just get along??? SMF, it's clear you want us to choose Cam, Mr. Scot, it's clear you are very anti-Cam. Both of you are pretty respectable posters. Both of you have no say in who we actually draft. I have one question for each of you: SMF, if we draft, say, PP or NicFlair, will you still support the player? And Mr. Scot, if we choose Cam #1, would you rally around our new QB?

I'm not anti-Newton so much as I'm anti-any quarterback in his draft, especially at #1. There's no franchise guy in this year's pool (the only one there was stayed in school) and we already have a highly picked "project" QB on roster, plus another who was picked later. It'd be silly to add another project into that mix, especially with the top pick. That pick would be better spent on other needs.

Clausen isn't going anywhere and, whether fans like it or not, he'll be given a shot to show that he can be "the guy". Given that situation, what we need to acquire is a reliable veteran fallback. That way, if Clausen proves he isn't worth it, we have someone to handle the duties this season and we can go looking for the "franchise" guy again next season (when the odds are expected to be better that we can get one).

I've watched the team make picks that I thought were mistakes many times (Clausen being one of them) but still hoped for the best. If they pick Newton, it'll be because they believe he's better than I think he is. And if that happens, then I'll hope they're right.

My preference though: No quarterbacks in any round, especially not at #1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't care how particular past players did at the combine. Know why?

I've been saying all along that tape means more than workouts. And guess what? So have the Panthers.

Cam Newton may have hurt his draft stock a little, or it may not have mattered. What matters most is the interview process... and that's something we have heard almost nothing about.

Also, I want to know the wonderlic scores.

Worth remembering that Rivera essentially said things like postseason bowl games and workouts don't really help, but they can hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone who uses the combine solely to suggest not taking someone is lacking intelligence IMO

Taking or not taking, honestly.

The combine and workouts are supposed to supplement what you learn from game tape, not revise it.

As I've said many times, put too much emphasis on non-game related action and you're going to wind up drafting the next Mike Mamula.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Taking or not taking, honestly.

The combine and workouts are supposed to supplement what you learn from game tape, not revise it.

As I've said many times, put too much emphasis on non-game related action and you're going to wind up drafting the next Mike Mamula.

Yeah I meant both. Looking good against air isn't impressive. On the other side, sometimes guys just have bad days. Sure the combine is a good look, but it really doesn't tell how a guy performs under game conditions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, did anybody see how fast Cam's top speed was? They clocked him at over 22mph in about the last 10yds of his 40. Can you imagine trying to tackle a 250lb man coming at you at 22mph? That's freakin scary.

So you are saying he is a slow starter and takes a while to get going?

I swear I read this somewhere else on this board...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Combine today told us exactly what we needed to know. Can Newton will need some time to be great and that Gabbert is more of a project then cam because he was hiding his poor accuracy and weak arm. Maybe can should not have thrown but at least teams know what there getting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In Alex Smith's defense. He's constantly getting better and better, and to this day he's looking more and more like a franchise QB.

Jamarcus is the typical "all the talent, but no passion" type of QB/Player you get in every draft.

Combines on one hand can be virtuously meaningless, while on the other hand it could save you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...