Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

With these FA moves, PFF guys don't know who to mock to us


TD alt
 Share

Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

They like Wallace as the green dot and running the defense. Inside the building probably thinks LB is set. 

I highly doubt this is the case. If we have a chance to add someone like Jacob Rodriguez in the 2nd round we better damn well take it.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For as much as some of you are classifying DT as a need, I think it's in the rest of the bucket with everything besides OT. Still, I think that there has to be someone that warrants the pick for us to pick him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The current plan is for him to go into this season wearing the green dot and being on the field for a super high snap count. 

🤷‍♂️

 

The team completely (along with the players) give him credit for the defenses improved play after he took over the green dot. 

Edited by carpanfan96
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

The current plan is for him to go into this season wearing the green dot and being on the field for a super high snap count. 

🤷‍♂️

 

The team completely (along with the players) give him credit for the defenses improved play after he took over the green dot. 

Well that's nice and all, but he's an awful player. If they're so impressed with him wearing the green dot then make him a coach.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He did green dot in 2024.  
I don’t question he may be a good dude and show some leadership. 

How long does it take someone to learn to find the ball and tackle the guy with the ball? Because that is where he sucks. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, strato said:

He did green dot in 2024.  
I don’t question he may be a good dude and show some leadership. 

How long does it take someone to learn to find the ball and tackle the guy with the ball? Because that is where he sucks. 

After he took over calling the defense he had 43 tackles, 2 sacks and 3 pd in 8 games. Not exactly bad numbers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

After he took over calling the defense he had 43 tackles, 2 sacks and 3 pd in 8 games. Not exactly bad numbers. 

Maybe you are right about the coaches liking him. To me, he was the guy standing on the edge of the pile. Slow to get to the ball. Late to the party. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

Well that's nice and all, but he's an awful player. If they're so impressed with him wearing the green dot then make him a coach.

"Awful" seems a bit hyperbolic. He has made plays at times. He's just "awful" in coverage.

Edited by TD alt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, TD alt said:

"Awful" seems a bit hyperbolic. He has made plays at times. He's just "awful" in coverage.

Lloyd next to Wallace gives them two lb that can blitz well and get sacks from inside as well as better coverage so they don't have to rely on Wallace to always drop into zone, they'll be able to get him downhill attacking the los more comparatively to what they did last year. Also adding Philips means Scranton sees less double teams and should open him up as a pass rusher and allows them to bring Princely on the field on obvious passing downs to rush the passer because they can move Phillips down onto the line in those situations. 

 

So on obvious passing downs the front seven will probably look like this majority of the time. 

Edge - Scourton 

Dt - Philips 

NT- Brown

Dt - Wharton

Edge - Umanmielen/Jones 

ILB - Lloyd

ILB - Wallace

Edited by carpanfan96
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, h0llywood said:

With all these signings addressing most of our needs, the only position I would not like to see in the 1st is a WR. If Makai Lemon happens to fall to 19, that would only hinder Coker's progress.

I have been listening to analysts, and receiver is surely in the mix (as well as it should be). X appears to be a bust, and people outside of the Huddle aren't looking at Coker as a sure-fire WR2. 

I think we're going BPA (and that's exactly what we should be doing).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nobody played well on defense last night. But, the vitriol towards Chatfield (and to a lesser extent, K'andre) is bigly misplaced. People (not just you) just refuse to accept how bad Slavin has been this season. And, I get it. Canes fans (and informed analysts) have spent nearly a decade trying to explain to casuals just how good Jaccccob is at hockey. 4Nations happened and the hockey watching public started to listen. National media even started floating the idea of creating a new award in his honor. Then this season, he gets hurt. It happens. NBD. But, when he finally came back, it wasn't the same. He'll get back to his old self in no time. Probably just some rust, it'll be fine. Only, it wasnt rust, and he's not fine. He's bad right now. It wasnt just last night. Although, that was absolutely the worst game of his NHL career. Slavin (-4) currently has the 3rd worst +/- of anyone left in the playoffs. We've  been begging the world to recognize Jaccob Slavin's greatness. And, by the time we finally got people to listen, he shits the bed! I blame Kash!
    • According to Scott Fowler, in an article about former Panthers announcer applying for a job with the Ravens... what that job pays, incidentally, when the Ravens posted it publicly they said the salary would be $4,000 to $5,000 per game. An NFL season consists of 20-24 games, including the preseason and potential playoff games, so it will end up somewhere between $80,000 and $120,000 a year. The person hired will be an independent contractor, which is commonplace in the NFL these days for team broadcasters, and also have other radio and TV hosting assignments.  https://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/nfl/carolina-panthers/article315839800.html    
    • That’s a good find. We will see. Who is still here from when he was? 
×
×
  • Create New...