Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tight End: The Need is Bigger than We Think


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, firefox1234 said:

Our red zone offense was excruciatingly painful to watch last season. A half decent TE would do a lot to change that.

We were dead center, 16th, in Red Zone TD percentage. Not terrible 

Edited by csx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Our TEs were ranked 47th, 52nd, and 57th in the league in receiving yards for TEs last season.

 

 

Cool. We can draft another TE to be primarily used for blocking. Not all offenses use TE significantly as receivers.

Sanders and Evans both had better catch percentages than the leading TEs in receiving yards. We dont target tght ends.

Edited by csx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, csx said:

Cool. We can draft another TE to be primarily used for blocking. Not all offenses use TE significantly as receivers.

Sanders and Evans both had better catch percentages than the leading TEs in receiving yards. We dont target tght ends.

By design of the offense or because our TEs suck? That's the question. Targeting our current TEs at a high rate would just be dumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

By design of the offense or because our TEs suck? That's the question. Targeting our current TEs at a high rate would just be dumb.

You want to use #19 to find out if we don’t target them because they suck or because we don’t embrace an expanded pass catching role due to philosophy? I don’t. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, strato said:

You want to use #19 to find out if we don’t target them because they suck or because we don’t embrace an expanded pass catching role due to philosophy? I don’t. 

Not what I said. They know within the building why we aren't utilizing TEs more. If the rumors were true that we were seriously pursuing a couple of decent receiving TEs that strongly points toward a lack of quality receiving TEs currently on the roster. Does that mean we consider drafting one at 19? I don't know, but it wouldn't shock me and if we did there's only one guy it would be. I wouldn't be surprised at all to see TE drafting somewhere in the first three rounds. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Taking only players from the sheet that are realistically available in or after the listed round, I’d like… 1st: DT Caleb Banks (Styles not realistic) 2nd: LB Jacob Rodriguez 3rd: OT Best available from Bowry, Barber, and Casey 4th: CB Daylen Everette 5th: S Jalen Huskey 6th: RB Adam Randall 7th: IOL Best available from Lemieux, Dawkins, Leausa, and Brose   I know nothing about some of the players listed, but it seems like that would be the best way it could fall for now. I’m sure the list of who we meet will change a ton, and there will also be players we don’t meet with to keep quiet. I’d love to pick up Randall in the late rounds. 
    • Not what I said. They know within the building why we aren't utilizing TEs more. If the rumors were true that we were seriously pursuing a couple of decent receiving TEs that strongly points toward a lack of quality receiving TEs currently on the roster. Does that mean we consider drafting one at 19? I don't know, but it wouldn't shock me and if we did there's only one guy it would be. I wouldn't be surprised at all to see TE drafting somewhere in the first three rounds. 
    • Yeah, I don’t know. Tepper was behind the Bryce selection. Behind firings and hiring over his lack of development.  He doesn’t have to literally tell them their hands are tied for them to know this. It is in the air constantly. The Canales Bryce play calling was even portrayed by more than one person as Canales failing Bryce, instead of Bryce being responsible for his own performance (except when he does well, then it is all him). Now they have an extra coach in, to help the new OC get results from this QB.  The atmosphere is not welcoming to prototypical young QBs that have talent. You get Jake Plummer types or old vets. I think we are stuck. 
×
×
  • Create New...