Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

For What It's Worth....


NanceUSMC

Recommended Posts

For what it's worth, which ain't much, I've been doing my annual pre-Draft routine and research, and have come up with what I believe the Panthers will do this April... I'm not sure who I feel the Panthers will select would be my first choice, but I also believe if they go this direction it's because they believe in what they've learned through their private workouts and interviews... All of the usual suspects come with a fair amount of positives and negatives, and can be debated to death (as I'm sure they will be by April, if not already)... You can easily make a case for any of Fairley, Bowers, Peterson, Green, Newton, etc... You can easily make a case for trading down... Again, though, I'm not saying this is what I would personally do if I was the one who made the decision, I am saying that right now, if the pick were made today, this is what I believe it would be... And in the end, regardless of who the Panthers select, this team has enough holes that almost any of the top prospects fit in one way or another... The only thing is, they'd better not miss... They miss on this one, and it's entirely possible they get a chance to 'do over' next year... Hit on this pick and you're respectable... Miss on it, and you're Oakland...

That said, enjoy the debate Panther fans... With the first pick in the 2011 NFL Draft, the Carolina Panthers select: Quarterback from Missouri, Blaine Gabbert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't complain if they drafted Gabbert. I just wish I had seen him play more because my last memory of him was that boneheaded INT he threw in the bowl game, which left a bad taste in my mouth. He does have a very quick release, and they said he did very well on the chalk board, so he is definitely a possibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't complain if they drafted Gabbert. I just wish I had seen him play more because my last memory of him was that boneheaded INT he threw in the bowl game, which left a bad taste in my mouth. He does have a very quick release, and they said he did very well on the chalk board, so he is definitely a possibility.

Agreed... I like his size/speed ratio... His intangibles are fantastic... He has excellent arm strength... There's quite a bit to like about him as a prospect... There are quite a few concerns I'd like to have addressed, of course... Glad that's not my decision to make... Or rather, glad my ass isn't the one on the line if we take him and he busts...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still prefer Green, because I feel like we're going to be losing Steve Smith soon but I also understand that going in with a purely green receiving corps is recipe for a disaster.

I like Peterson a lot - he would basically solidify our secondary enormously.

Dareus I don't know enough about, but I understand the need at DT. It's just such an unsexy position to draft I have trouble getting into it... but I would certainly be happy if we did fill that need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That is just Panthers history pain speaking.
    • From what I gather, sure it allows you more room in that you can manipulate the cap more due to smaller prorated amounts to fit salaries in, but for cap purposes, you're still on the hook for the money at the end of the day.    "ChatGPT You said: What are the advantages for NFL teams to sign larger signing bonuses? ChatGPT said: NFL teams often use large signing bonuses as a strategic tool in contracts. While they cost real cash up front, they offer several advantages, especially when it comes to salary cap management, player retention, and negotiation leverage. Here's a breakdown of the benefits: ✅ 1. Salary Cap Flexibility Signing bonuses are prorated over the life of the contract (up to 5 years) for salary cap purposes. This allows teams to spread out the cap hit, even if the player receives the money immediately. Example: A $20M signing bonus on a 4-year deal counts only $5M/year against the cap. ✅ 2. Attracting Top Talent Players love signing bonuses because they're guaranteed money paid up front. Offering a bigger signing bonus can sweeten the deal without inflating yearly salaries. ✅ 3. Front-Loading Real Cash, Not Cap Teams with strong cash flow can pay big bonuses now while minimizing the immediate cap hit. Useful for teams trying to build around rookie QB contracts or with flexible cash budgets. ✅ 4. Locking in Key Players Larger bonuses make it harder for a player to be released early due to dead cap consequences. This can create more job security for the player and roster continuity for the team. ✅ 5. Leverage in Restructures Big signing bonuses create future cap hits via proration. Teams can later restructure deals (e.g., convert salary to bonus) to create even more cap space. ✅ 6. Competitive Edge In free agency, a team offering more guaranteed cash up front often wins the bidding war, even if the total contract value is lower than another team's. ⚠️ Key Caveat: Large signing bonuses increase dead cap risk if the player is cut or traded early."   I think that roster bonuses can be a useful tool if you're trying to keep players in by manipulating numbers and spreading the hit over time, but I don't think that it's something that you want to use unless it's "necessary." I don't know that you want to get into signing rookies on roster bonuses, as the bust rate is relatively high.    
    • not even if that team in New Orleans disbands before the first game.  Saw one 2026 mock that had them drafting first next year.  
×
×
  • Create New...