Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I've never seen the 3 original star wars movies...


SorthNarolina

Recommended Posts

with the way movies are made now I guess I can see someone not going back to watch the first 3 Star Wars movies.

Not sure how you can opt out and not watch the first Matrix and LOTR though.....good stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the originals revolutionized visual and sound effects.

the new ones, not at all.

Doesn't really stand the test of time imo. If it wasn't for films like the original Star Wars, obviously we wouldn't have things like Avatar or the Star Wars prequels, but still, it's hard to watch a movie that relies so heavily on special effects when it's dated and isn't that impressive.

It's the kind of movie I'd have to force myself to watch. On the surface it's like watching black and white films or a silent film. It just doesn't have the appeal of things like the Narnia, LOTR or Star Wars prequels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man just do it... They are OKAY and have their moments aside from the crappy acting and ghey love story... The 3rd one is actually good...

Don't listen to mmmbeans... He's obviously anti-Lucas or something...

canon man... it is canon!

You can't just write off the prequels just like I don't let Christians just write off the OT... Just because Jesus came doesn't mean you can ignore your pooty past!

Done! FYI- I ordered it along with some other things on Amazon... My Audit busy season is winding down so I’m looking to fill in my time. I’m thinking next weekend I will have a star wars marathon and watch them all in one sitting. I’m also giving Fallout 3 another try (this time on easy difficulty)… Then I ordered Mass effect 1 & 2 + Assassin’s creed brother hood (loved the previous assassin’s creed). I should be good for awhile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Done! FYI- I ordered it along with some other things on Amazon... My Audit busy season is winding down so I’m looking to fill in my time. I’m thinking next weekend I will have a star wars marathon and watch them all in one sitting. I’m also giving Fallout 3 another try (this time on easy difficulty)… Then I ordered Mass effect 1 & 2 + Assassin’s creed brother hood (loved the previous assassin’s creed). I should be good for awhile.

You and I would probably be good friends... lol...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PS3, but very rarely lately... having a kid ends your world... lol

Lol, I can imagine.... working 55 hours a week right now I feel I have little time to myself and that's without kids... But I'm still a couple of years away... look forward to it, but not rushing it.

FYI, you need to trade that in and get a 360!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He gets the blame because his role as the QB is to make plays, help the team score more points and elevate players around him. He does none of that. Just because he didn’t massively mess up doesn’t mean he wasn’t a reason for the loss. The bar some of you have for Bryce is incredibly low.
    • Yeah I was crying about this earlier in the year when we got to 6 wins. Equal number to Wilks.  We are still a QB away. 
    • Hey y'all, a topic that has been on my mind has always been the parallels between two of the best quarterbacks in the history of the NFC South and ultimately their place in history and how they are viewed moving forward through the rest of NFL history. These two quarterbacks as you might have guessed are their respective franchises greatest signal callers, Cam Newton and Matt Ryan.  Cam Newton (144 Games Started): 269 TDs (1.8 per contest), 123 INTs, Super Bowl Appearance, OROTY, MVP  Matt Ryan (234 Games Starter):  394 TDs (1.6 per contest), 183 INTs, Super Bowl Appearance, OROTY, MVP  Obviously on first glance, these are very similar players with identical top accomplishments. Let's zoom in a little bit on their surrounding talent. C Cam Newton top offensive producers:  Greg Olsen (TE) (9 Seasons) (3 Pro Bowls) Steve Smith Sr. (WR) (3 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl) Matt Ryan top offensive producers:  Julio Jones (WR) (10 Seasons) (7 Pro Bowls)  Roddy White (WR) (8 Seasons) (4 Pro Bowls)  Tony Gonzalez (TE) (5 Seasons) (4 Pro Bowls)  Wow, quite the difference here. Through Cam's career his top option was Greg Olsen, who was one of the best tight ends of his generation and a real difference maker in an offense reliant on their quarterback making plays outside of structure. Newton post Steve Smith Sr was saddled with a revolving door of Chicken McNobodies at the receiver position and the offense had to be funneled through the tight end and running attack as Jericho Cotchery, Corey Brown, Jason Avant, Kelvin Benjamin, etc was not getting the job done. Ryan on the other hand was consistently surrounded with top level offensive weapons, including one of the best receivers and tight ends in the history of the game, thanks in part to an aggressive general manager who wanted to ensure they could maximize the arm talent of their franchise quarterback.  How about protection?  Cam Newton top offensive lineman: Jordan Gross (3 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl)  Ryan Kalil (8 Seasons) (2 Pro Bowls) Andrew Norwell (4 Seasons)  Trai Turner (6 Seasons) (5 Pro Bowls) Matt Ryan top offensive lineman:  Jake Matthews (8 Seasons) (1 Pro Bowl)  Alex Mack (5 Seasons) (3 Pro Bowls)  Andy Levitre (3 Seasons)  Todd McLure (5 Seasons)  While Matt Ryan certainly had more consistency and high level talent on his offensive line, one could argue they had similar protection through the bulk of their career. Though one has to acknowledge some of the absolute dog water lineman that were trot out to protect Newton at his tackle spots post Jordan Gross retirement. Byron Bell, Mike Remmers, Matt Kalil, Chris Clark, Amini Silatolu, Nate Chandler, etc were all a collective pile of garbage save for two seasons from Remmers and a few splashes of brilliance from Michael Oher, Daryl Williams, and early career Taylor Moton.  Defense should be fairly simple.  Cam Newton defense average rank:  17th/32 Matt Ryan defense average rank:  18th/32  Honestly I was a bit surprised by this, I had thought Cam consistently had the better defenses, but when you look at the average it's shockingly close. While Newton did have the higher peaks of defense, Atlanta placed higher more consistently and only really faltered towards the end of Ryan's career. Both these players had on and off again defenses to rely on.  So what does all this mean?  1. I am bored at work  2. Cam Newton has the better body of work given the talent around him  While I am not sure either is necessarily a lock to get a gold jacket, it's undeniable that Newton carried his franchise on his back for the better part of his career and changed how quarterbacks are viewed as a whole. Newton became the blueprint for a new breed of signal caller, and Ryan is the standard that is set for pocket quarterbacks in the modern league. Both players deserve their kudos for what they did for their franchises and how they morphed their team's identity, but Newton I think was clearly the better of the NFC South quarterbacks, especially if he had remained as healthy as Ryan did. 
×
×
  • Create New...