Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Odds of winning next year's Super Bowl


Matt Foley

Recommended Posts

Well, I can understand the saints, they are a scary team who was decimated by injuries last year. They brought in a DC for next year, so all they should do is improve.

Drew Brees is scary good.

The Saints have been picked by many to represent the NFC since their playoff appearance a few years ago. Every year it’s, “If they only fix that defense.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Saints have been "Super Scary" for the past two seasons and what did that garner them....two non-winning seasons.

Saints will be a media darling once again, to only wilt away during the season.

Maybe they can come up with another new excuse as to why they were not successful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Saints have been "Super Scary" for the past two seasons and what did that garner them....two non-winning seasons.

Saints will be a media darling once again, to only wilt away during the season.

Maybe they can come up with another new excuse as to why they were not successful.

If the Saints got to play all of their games in the dome, they'd be very scary. The fact is, they can't play on the road, and their defense isn't very good at all.

I know some teams are built for indoor play, and yadda yadda, but teams that don't win on the road usually have leadership issues. Brees seems to be a fantastic leader, but where's it go after that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean I just don't understand the argument. Baker and Sam both have been pro bowl QBs post their time here. And you just said yourself that is due to him having a damn good roster around him and they are well coached. You're even saying the bad baker is still there somewhere, but he is in a good organization with good roster and coaching that they are getting the best out of him. Why does Baker and Sam get all that benefit of the doubt but when it comes to Bryce it must be a BY9 problem, not an org or team problem?  Hell I got a guy below you arguing with me that Chark/Hurst/Mingo sucked because Bryce wouldn't throw them open. It's ridiculous how far the stretch goes. 
    • Correct.  It’s really hard to get open in the NFL when opposing defenses gameplan and cheat coverage/routes on all your players because they know your QB can’t make certain throws/plays.   magically no one that comes to Carolina can get open or make plays with the ball in their hands…..it’s like there is one singular common dominator to it all.  BY makes playing defense way too easy.   NFL players are too good to allow one side to cheat coverage and not respect all the potential threats of a route  so you can dial up a great play.  But if corners and safeties just cheat coverage and know X and Y happening on route/threats….getting open gets hard when they just play it one way.  Getting open has a lot to do with the different threats a WR can pose on a given play.  
    • Kinda depends how you look at it both were 3rd round draft pics.  Nico was nothing before stroud and tank came in with stroud.  If both were on the panthers would young have them doing well and starting or would their stats be low.  I really dont know the answer to that.  None of the panthers wrs have left and did well either but personally i feel neither of nico or tank would do much on the panthers.  
×
×
  • Create New...