Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Crazy Car Comparison...


Darth Biscuit

Recommended Posts

What's the difference in these two cars?

2012 Nissan GTR

2012-nissan-gtr-opt.jpg

2011 Bugatti Veyron

01-2011-bugatti-veyron-super-sport-autocartrends-500x332.jpg

The Veyron costs $1.3 million, has 1001 horsepower and will do 0-to-60 in about 2.6 seconds.

The GTR costs $96 Grand, has 550 horsepower and will do 0-to-60 in 2.9 seconds.

2.9 seconds... that is freaking incredible for a production car.

I want one... or 13.5 of them for the price on one Veyron.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you buy a car that costs north of 100k is never about the specs, its about the image.

So the difference is that everyone knows you had $1,204,000 more to spend on a car that the guy with the Nissan.

That's true... but my point was the GTR has nearly the performance of the Veyron (except top speed) for less than a tenth the cost.

Plus it does it with a 6 cylinder engine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really know about cars but my grandpa always had an El Camino and he said he was going to pass it down to me and he'd show me how to work on it and stuff but he died before that happened and I never got the car even though the whole family knew it was supposed to go to me. My dad offered to get me one but I didn't want one after that. Now I find myself looking for them all the time (even though both me and my fiance have perfectly fine cars) to buy and work on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...