Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Salary Floor implications


Stumpy

Recommended Posts

There has been a lot of talk, lately, about available veteran free agents and whether or not JR is teh cheap. I thought it would be interesting to take a look at the projections of what the new salary cap/floor will look like, and how it might affect our off-season moves.

First off, with the contracts currently on the books, our cap figure would be right around $70 million. With the new salary floor being projected anywhere from $120-135 million.

Going on the lower end of the spectrum, that leaves us roughly $50 million that we must to spend to reach the salary floor. If you account for Kalil's franchise tender and JShock's contract, that number moves to about $37 mil. Assuming we re-sign Williams, Johnson, Davis and Anderson, I would expect them to come in around $20 mil.

Now we are down to +/- $17 mil. Depending on a rookie scale, our draft picks will probably account for about $6-10 million. (Most 'experts' believe that, regardless of the pay scale, 1st round picks won't garner the huge contracts of the past couple years.)

That leaves us with about $7-11 million that we must spend to comply with league rules. This means that we are likely to pick up at least one high-end FA or, more likely IMO, 2-3 mid-level guys a la Shockey. So get your wishlists ready...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there has been a lot of talk, lately, about available veteran free agents and whether or not jr is teh cheap. i thought it would be interesting to take a look at the projections of what the new salary cap/floor will look like, and how it might affect our off-season moves.

First off, with the contracts currently on the books, our cap figure would be right around $70 million. With the new salary floor being projected anywhere from $120-135 million.

Going on the lower end of the spectrum, that leaves us roughly $50 million that we must to spend to reach the salary floor. If you account for kalil's franchise tender and jshock's contract, that number moves to about $37 mil. Assuming we re-sign williams, johnson, davis and anderson, i would expect them to come in around $20 mil.

Now we are down to +/- $17 mil. Depending on a rookie scale, our draft picks will probably account for about $6-10 million. (most 'experts' believe that, regardless of the pay scale, 1st round picks won't garner the huge contracts of the past couple years.)

that leaves us with about $7-11 million that we must spend to comply with league rules. This means that we are likely to pick up at least one high-end fa or, more likely imo, 2-3 mid-level guys a la shockey. So get your wishlists ready...

[attach]34408[/attach]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No way teh floor is $120 try around 80 million with the Cap being around $120.

Yeah I don't see the floor being that high.

If the calculations of the floor, in respect to the cap, are similar to the previous model, the floor will be roughly 90% of the cap.

And as for a $120 million cap, without even counting franchise tags or re-signing any players, 5 teams would already be over that number. When you add draft picks alone to that, another 5 would likely break $120 mil.

Edit: Based on that link, we are at $73 million before Shockey and the Franchise Tag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the calculations of the floor, in respect to the cap, are similar to the previous model, the floor will be roughly 90% of the cap.

And as for a $120 million cap, without even counting franchise tags or re-signing any players, 5 teams would already be over that number. When you add draft picks alone to that, another 5 would likely break $120 mil.

Edit: Based on that link, we are at $73 million before Shockey and the Franchise Tag.

Those 5 teams will have to cut players. Last cap year accord to the link you posted was 2009 that cap was $130 million. Owners will get concessions so you can figure the cap will be around $120. Look at 2006 the cap was $94 million. So between $94 million and $130 million will be the cap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those 5 teams will have to cut players. Last cap year accord to the link you posted was 2009 that cap was $130 million. Owners will get concessions so you can figure the cap will be around $120. Look at 2006 the cap was $94 million. So between $94 million and $130 million will be the cap.

The cap is based on league income from the year prior. Therefore, this years cap will be based on the $9 billion in income once it has been redistributed.

Under the last CBA ($1 billion off the top +40% for owners and 60% for players) it works out to $4.2 bil for the owners and $4.8 bil for the players. The owners have said they would like to reverse that number by taking another $1 bil off the top.

Based on that formula you have $7 bil left over. Split the same 60-40 for the players, you get $4.8 billion to the owners and $4.2 billion for the players.

$4.2 bil divided by the 32 teams comes up with a cap number of approx. $131.25 million. Leaving a floor number of about $118 million.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The cap is based on league income from the year prior. Therefore, this years cap will be based on the $9 billion in income once it has been redistributed.

Under the last CBA ($1 billion off the top +40% for owners and 60% for players) it works out to $4.2 bil for the owners and $4.8 bil for the players. The owners have said they would like to reverse that number by taking another $1 bil off the top.

Based on that formula you have $7 bil left over. Split the same 60-40 for the players, you get $4.8 billion to the owners and $4.2 billion for the players.

$4.2 bil divided by the 32 teams comes up with a cap number of approx. $131.25 million. Leaving a cap number of about $118 million.

The Split wont be 60-40. look for it to be closer to 53-47 players/owners. The players are going to give some money back to the owners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Split wont be 60-40. look for it to be closer to 53-47 players/owners. The players are going to give some money back to the owners.

I absolutely could be wrong on this, but, from what I have read, I have understood it that the league wants to flip the overall money, not percentages. I believe that the 53-47% split that has been floated is assuming the players won't go for the extra $1 billion. That would again give you, roughly, $4.2 bil to the players and $4.8 to the league.

If you have read anything to the contrary, I would love to read it. This whole situation has become extremely convoluted and hard to grasp. I'm not sure we will really know anything until a deal gets done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming that the players' share of the revenue is around $4.2 (approximately equivalent to a cap of $131.25M for each team) the players would be conceding about half a billion dollars in revenue to the owners. that would amount to more than 10% pay cut on an overall basis as far as the players are concerned. I don't think the owners can expect more than that.

I think a salary cap of roughly $130M is realistic. You go down to $125M and that amounts nearly a 20% decrease in players' revenue compared to the previous CBA. I can't imagine the players accepting that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Richardson--the crazy man who slashed costs last season (and I am still upset about it)--has us in good shape. There is still speculation that Steve Smith wants out, and if he leaves, that is an additional (guessing) $8 million, of course, he would have to be replaced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep in mind that list is "only for players currently under contract for the 2011 season".

So you also have to consider what that money buys. As of that date the Panthers had only 39 players under contract for 2011. Shockey makes it 40. If and when Kalil signs his franchise tag that will make 41.

So, then they have to fill out the rest of the roster, add in the "dead money", the practice squad, and have a considerable cushion left to add players throughout the long season to replace injured/IR'd players.

The money will spend up fast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 active cotracts + Jshock and Kalil we're up to 41. Dwill, CJ, TD and Anderson make 45. We have seven draft picks which brings us up to 52. Add in one free agent and you've got a 53 man roster.

So, we have $37 million to reach the projected floor, and 12 slots to fill out the roster. I think it is very likely that we, at the very least, re-sign our core guys (Williams, Johnson, Anderson and TD) while possibly adding another FA or 2.

Does the PS count against the cap? I've never been clear on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The OL has certainly been better than the trainwreck it was three or four years ago. As far as competitiveness let's apply some realism and clarity here. Quite a bit of the competitiveness in 2025 came from the defensive side of the ball which gave up the most points in league history the year before and was one of the bottom 5 units in terms of salary cap allocation for 2025 while the OL was top 3. We had the 26th passing offense last year. And if not for a herculean couple of games from Rico Dowdle we don't back our way into the division title or make the playoffs because we went 4-6 in our final ten games including being swept by the Saints who were starting a rookie 2nd round pick most of us mercilessly mocked when they selected him. In conclusion yes we've seen a difference. The question now is will the investment pay off the way we want. But the only way that happens is if we field a top 15 offense. If we can't even crack the top 20 then there need to be some very warm seats across the board. And I would hope just about anyone here should agree with that.
    • These Spurs are lowkey loaded.  If healthy, they could win it all this year (#2 in the West right now). I still think we’ve gotta keep Kalk on Wemby; he’s not getting completely dominated like every other NBA center.
    • Am I the only one who doesn't understand this fan bases infatuation with adding a high end TE? Especially when we have some bigger bodies in T-Mac and Coker who can slide into the slot at times and provide the big dependable target over the middle that most teams use their TE for. I mean, sure, it would be nice to have one of those elite TE's, but I feel like that's a position your better off going cheap with a committee who each bring something different to the table while spending our cap room on the more important positions. I like the potential we saw from Evans this year, Sanders could be a best if he can stay healthy, and Tremble has improved as well.  Just feels like spending high draft picks or cap space on other needs and more important positions is a better use of our resources than splashing on a TE in the draft or FA. Are those guys on the level of the Bowers or McBride's of the world?  Of course not, but we also are paying a fraction of the cost on our TE room than they are, and we're able to use that money for other needs.
×
×
  • Create New...