Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2010 Carolina Panthers: What the Film Revealed


KaseKlosed

Recommended Posts

carolina-panthers-nfl-fitted-black-hats-id8095.jpg

2010 Carolina Panthers: What the Film Revealed

By ANDY BENOIT

While we wonder whether there will be a 2011 season, this is part of a series looking back at the 2010 season, with the benefit of film analysis. This week, we look at the N.F.C. South:

Offense

Carolina Panthers

On the bright side, the Panthers’ season answered once and for all the question of whether an N.F.L. team can win without a quarterback. The last coach to say a team could win sans a good quarterback was probably John Fox — and he changed his view a few years ago. Fox’s Panthers validated his new stance; neither Matt Moore nor Jimmy Clausen proved capable of executing a pro offense. Both were unable to read defenses before the snap and failed to push the ball downfield in the face of pressure. Clausen was particularly wide-eyed. He had three tricks in his bag: the checkdown, the dumpoff (usually a checkdown that occurs a second too late) and the throw away (usually a checkdown that occurs a second too early).

Because teams had zero respect for Carolina’s passing attack (which, to be fair to the quarterbacks, featured a receiving corps of ill-prepared youngsters and an unfocused Steve Smith), the ground game had no chance. It’s too bad because, aside from overwhelmed guard Mackenzy Bernadeau, the offensive line was adequate. Left tackle Jordan Gross played at his usual Pro Bowl level and center Ryan Kalil was once again agile in space and (usually) strong enough in traffic.

Defense

This would have been a top 15 defense had the safeties been a little savvier. The young starters Sherrod Martin and Charles Godfrey were not always on the same page as the cornerbacks. Everyone seemed to play a hair short of his abilities.

This wasn’t the case with the front seven. Jon Beason was his usual ravenous self at weakside and middle linebacker. Before hurting his hip, middle linebacker Dan Connolly was an excellent downhill force. And blooming authoritatively, at least early in the season, was the fifth-year pro James Anderson, who made countless solo plays against the run and pass.

Carolina’s most impressive player might have been defensive end Charles Johnson. Playing in a contract year, Johnson consistently reached the quarterback rushing inside and outside. He also proved adept in all phases of run defense. The Panthers’ problem was that not a single other pass-rusher seemed to show up (unless you count sixth-round rookie Greg Hardy, who displayed intriguing potential early on).

Myth Buster

Carolina is weak at defensive tackle

This is true from a pass-rushing standpoint, but on first and second down, the Panthers were consistently staunch inside. Undersized former Jaguar Derek Landri was tough to block because of his tirelessness and ability to penetrate. Andre Neblett played frequently down the stretch and was, at times, almost immovable. Nick Hayden had to rely on effort more than talent, which put a ceiling on his output, but he was rarely a weak spot. It would be justifiable for the Panthers to draft an explosive inside player early, but that doesn’t mean the incumbents are bums.

Something Positive

When healthy (which wasn’t often enough), DeAngelo Williams and Jonathan Stewart were shining stars, as always. But when they weren’t healthy, the Panthers were feeding the ball to Mike Goodson. The 2009 fourth-round pick turned out to be pretty intriguing. Goodson shows loose hips and speed early in runs. He accelerates well. If he learns to dance less and hones his pass-blocking, the Panthers will have, at the very least, a solid 15-touches-a-game-type back.

Andy Benoit is the founder of NFLTouchdown.com and a writer for the CBSSports.com Eye on Football blog

http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/04/05/2010-carolina-panthers-what-the-film-revealed/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Anderson was more of a force than he is being credited with here. Other than that I am amazed that someone actually put together a well informed write up of the Panthers.

Kudos.

After about week 9 or so Anderson kinda became Na'il Diggs - solid, but anonymous. The impactful, eye-opening plays were almost all in the first half of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have not read the entire thread, and I realize this is fluff to a degree, but it was recorded in real time.  Here are 10 things that stood out to me: 1. Morgan wrote down (before day 3) the first three day 3 picks.  (Lee, Hecht, and Wheatley).  I was never fond of the Morgan hiring as GM.  I thought he was a lazy selection and I questioned his ability to match wits with some of the best GMs in the NFL.  Not any more. Morgan OWNED this draft.  He knew which players were good fits and when they would be bargains, and he got bargains.  I am thoroughly excited about every player. 2. Canales said (about Hecht, a 5th rounder):  "He has a real chance to start."   Morgan said the same thing about Freeling. While I do not expect either to start day 1, it looks to me like we drafted 40% of our starting OL in 2026.  I think we will sign Ickey to a deal and play him at RG, allowing us to escape the Robert Hunt contract in 2027.  Of course that is conditional, and Ickey could replace Moton instead, but if he fully recovers, we are looking at a better RG/RT than he was a LT--which was average.  3. When Morgan said to second-round DT Hunter, "Ready to play beside Derrick Brown?"  Based on personalities, one calm and soft spoken (for the Most part, Brown is) and the other talkative and openly enthusiastic, it reminded me of Brentson Buckner and Kris Jenkins.   4.  Perhaps the steal of the draft was Tennessee WR Chris Brazzell II.  Clearly the Panthers felt that they passed on him when they took Hunter in round 2.  They mentioned his skill set (able to attack on "all three levels.")  This sent me back to watching film. He has speed, hands, and he produced without a great QB. I think he could be great in the NFL.  When  5. Tepper was a bit more involved than I would like, but he seems to be very confident in Morgan.  If I were the owner, I would be doing the same thing.  Canales was also somewhat of a background character--everyone understood his role and stayed in his lane.   6.  I am also very interested in the quantitative analytics aspect of the draft room.  (something like, "He has a 94% chance of being there at pick 55, and a 38% chance of being there at 87). I would like to know their formula, because it seemed to be spot on. 7.  BPA?  Not really.  They had a shopping list and seemed to be targeting the players they selected. I realize other players were edited out, but I was impressed how they knew, by round, who they wanted and if there were multiple options sitting there, they traded back. 8.  Evero (I think) called Lee a candidate that would serve as the "#3 CB."  Morgan describes his size as a plus (Long). Strong praise for a 4th rounder.  If so, we have Thornton coming off injury who played well as an UDFA rookie and they will battle it out to become Jackson's replacement after the 2026 season, assuming the Panthers do not extend him (he turns 30 in 7 months.O 9.  I think we could realistically see every one of these draft picks play this season, and I believe most could start by next year--Realistically, Freeling, Hunter, Hecht, and Brazzell could all be starting or key rotational pieces this year.  I see Lee and Wheatley getting special teams reps and both could be used this season more than expected.   10.  Kuwatch seemed to be predetermined with the final pick, probably because he can add something special to special teams.   He and Bam Martin Scott will fight it out for the 4th ILB position, so it will probably come down to special teams--and Kuwatch stands out there.  Imagine an ILB with a 46.5 vertical (not a typo) on the FG block team.  Kuwatch has an 8.85 RAS score vs. Martin-Scott's 7.5.  
    • They did mention Bain as the pick if he fell but didnt seem confident that would be the case. 
    • Exactly what I am thinking. 
×
×
  • Create New...