Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dear Jerry Richardson, Peter Karmanos and Michael Jordan,


Stumpy

Recommended Posts

Except you have a lot more credibility in the Newton threads. In this one you just sound foolish.

No, the homers in this one are just more united because he's a NC guy.

I know the type of person he is and I think he's a POS.

I also know that people tend to look back on athletes from different eras and think there is no way that today's athletes can compare and they are never as good no matter what they accomplish.

Barry Sanders is a perfect example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, the homers in this one are just more united because he's a NC guy.

And you're not biased as an LA resident, Laker fan, and Kobe slurper? Please.

It's evident you've got no argument on this one (Kobe being on Michael's level), but thanks for playing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you're not biased as an LA resident, Laker fan, and Kobe slurper? Please.

It's evident you've got no argument on this one (Kobe being on Michael's level), but thanks for playing.

I wasn't trying to argue that originally and I said with a few more rings he's 100% in the discussion, which is true.

He's loosely in the discussion now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So much for MJ being a good guy...

“It’s gone on long enough,” said a source close to Jordan. “Michael is not going to sit by while some kid attempts to forge a new basketball legacy in Chicago. Michael is adamant that he always be the King of Chicago. So Derrick must die.”

Despite Rose winning NBA Rookie of the Year two seasons ago and making the All-Star team last year, Jordan reportedly did not become threatened by the 22 year-old star until very recently.

“Mike didn’t think Rose would ever be much of a player,” said a Charlotte Bobcats staff member who wished to remain anonymous, “because he is a terrible, terrible, terrible judge of talent. Just terrible. Really, a few years ago he was worried that Kirk Hinrich would challenge all of his Bulls records. Derrick even being a serviceable NBA player caught Michael by complete surprise.”

source

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't trying to argue that originally and I said with a few more rings he's 100% in the discussion, which is true.

He's loosely in the discussion now

:rolleyes:

Michael Jordan won 11 NBA MVP Awards, Kobe Bryant has 3 NBA MVP Awards. Would someone please explain to me how that warrants him being held in the same breath as Michael Jordan?

You're either in denial, haven't watched much game tape on Jordan, or both. No former or current player is even close to what Michael Jordan was on the basketball court, & I doubt anyone ever will be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also know that people tend to look back on athletes from different eras and think there is no way that today's athletes can compare and they are never as good no matter what they accomplish.

No former or current player is even close to what Michael Jordan was on the basketball court, & I doubt anyone ever will be.

Thank you sir for illustrating this point

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...