Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Just more evidence that the Charlotte Observer is the propaganda arm of the Panthers

Fiz

By Fiz,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Fiz Newbie

Fiz

Posted
Posted

I think the firing of Darin Gantt pretty much puts this issue to rest, if it was even a point of contention anymore.

This tweet specifically says a lot to me.

I've been re-assigned to the Winthrop University beat. Publisher Debbie Abels and editor Paul Osmundson were good to let me stay on.

Ever since I started really knowing what I was watching with football, which started about 2001-2002, the Panthers have kept the lid locked tight when it comes to the personnel covering the team. This extends to the team website, television and newspapers. Pacman was always kind of a wild card in that regard.

I never thought Gantt was right for the Charlotte Observer. He's far too opinionated and harsh in his criticism for a paper that unironically employs Tom Sorensen. Charlotte is the most boring big city in the country, and the paper reflects that. From a personality standpoint, the Panthers match the city, and that's just the way Richardson likes it.

Nothing is printed about the Panthers in the Charlotte Observer that the team doesn't approve. Now obviously it's not to the point where the paper reports that we actually in fact won the Super Bowl last year. It's not Pravda. But the team prefers a very stale, controlled, predictable media narrative. If there is criticism, we want it soft and meaningless, ie why Tom Sorensen has a job. This is called Manufacturing Dissent btw, and the Charlotte Observer has at least shown complicity in doing the Panthers dirty work. Long story short: the person being criticized creates the critical talking point. Edward bernays came up with this in the early 20th century but blah blah blah off topic

Remember, Yasinskas was fired just for printing a prosaic rant that Jenkins made. By the end of the year they were both gone, and I think looking back it's hard to fault Kris for anything he said or Pat for printing it. He was replaced eventually by at that point largely unknown (except to us) Darin Gantt.

Rosinski was fired just for some offhanded comments he made about not receiving a ring. These looked bad on the front office (as they should, wtf jerry?) so he was replaced. He was replaced with someone completely benign, inoffensive, and coincidentally terrible at his job.

When you want to make an unpopular change you don't make it obvious. Think of your own work place or someone getting fired that is replaced. How many days is that replacement there for before the axe falls? How many people know that axe is coming? Who the fug is Joe Person?

It's yet to be seen if Person will toe the line like Gantt did but I doubt it. His recent posts have offered nothing but company line filler. It's depressing, but we should have known Gantt was on the way out especially after Richardson called his name in person at that press conference.

I say shame on the Panthers and shame on the Charlotte Observer. The Observer is compliant because they feel they can't bite the hand that feeds. The Newspaper business is dying and they can't risk losing access to one of their main draws. I'd argue that there's not another gig in town but hey that's just me.

Gantt will almost certainly land on his feet. Yasinskas and Rosinski both got better gigs. Gantt is too national, too popular, and too good at this job to stay at fuging Winthrop for too long. I doubt he'll go into TV, maybe radio, but he'll do fine.

As for us? What does the complicity of the Charlotte Observer mean?

Well, remember last year when I pointed out that every single article on the panthers main page and opinion piece from the observer suddenly shifted from "what do we do about qb" to "matt moore is ready to take over," and shortly thereafter Jake was cut? When something like that is so tightly controlled, everything that's said means something. instead of tons of free opinions that might be right, there's one message you can read a lot in to.

What's everyone saying about the number 1 pick recently?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Highlandfire Newbie

Highlandfire

Posted
Posted

it's not a conspiracy per se. there aren't people meeting in a dark room.

the panthers want it one way. the observer wants to keep the panthers happy.

I would tell the Panthers to fug off. You have to allow our reporters to your pressers etc so we are going to continue to report the news. Don't like what we print? Tough poo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      The running back situation....

      By strato · Posted

      okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Captain Morgan
      OTA's

      By Captain Morgan · Posted

      Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • WUnderhill
      Myles Garrett Traded to Rams

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...