Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CSR: Shawn Zobel of Draft Headquarters on Panthers draft plans


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

Draft Headquarters began three years ago as a scouting, evaluataion and mock draft site and since then lead writer Shawn Zobel's record speaks for itself. He has accurately predicted more 1st round picks than either Mel Kiper or Todd McShay, and at this point it is accepted among NFL insiders that he does have sources and connections around the league.

It's surprising, however, that Zobel would offer up as much information as he did last night over his Twitter feed that tipped the hand of numerous teams. Sure, perhaps this could all be a stunt to drum up website hits or expand his brand- but if he's not being truthful it's a big risk to take. Furthermore, everything could all be smokescreen... we just don't know.

After the jump I'll give you what Zobel has said, and we can discuss everything and what it means for the Panthers.

Let's start with what Zobel said that directly relates to the Panthers:

- Carolina have no interest in QB Blaine Gabbert with the #1 pick. If Gabbert goes #1 overall it will be because the Panthers traded the pick. Currently 4/5 teams in the top 5 want to take a QB. Carolina and Buffalo are set on Cam Newton, while Cincinnati and Arizona have Blaine Gabbert at the top of their board.

- The Panthers are interested in trading out of the #1 spot for the right price, and Zobel puts the Panthers' chances of moving out at 50/50. If Carolina were able to trade out they would not be able to get either QB, and Newton would go to Buffalo and Gabbert to either Cincinnati or Arizona. He believes it would take a big offer to move the Panthers out of #1.

So there we have it. It's certainly a lot to digest, but if this is accurate then we get a very, very good idea what we could be looking at. There appears to be trade potential at #1 from numerous angles;:

- CIN or ARZ could move up for Gabbert

- Buffalo (who Zobel says "Cam Newton is by far Buffalo's #1 guy") could try and buy Newton from the Panthers.

- Washington could try and leapfrog everyone if they like Gabbert enough

What appears shocking though is just how much the QBs are now looking like they'll fly off the board. Zobel is essentially predicting that Newton and Gabbert will be top 3 picks, Locker a top 10 pick and Mallett gone before the end of the 1st round.

Read more: http://www.derp/2011/4/13/2108211/shawn-zobel-of-draft-headquarters-spills-beans-on-many-draft-plans#storyjump

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the guy Haters laughed at because he claimed a source close to draftheadquarters.com which was basically saying he had a source close to himself :lol:

In his defense he was the first to report that Cam was our #1 target.

Of course if we go out and draft Dareus he will have some serious egg on his face :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...and here's a follow up from his blog:

1. Carolina – I’ve been told that Cam Newton will be the pick unless the Panthers receive a big enough package to move down. I was told by one source that it’s 50-50 as to whether they’d get a good enough package to entice them to move down. At this point, I’m completely assuming that Newton will be the pick until I hear otherwise.

Read more: http://draftheadquarters.com/dhqblogs/?p=708

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the guy Haters laughed at because he claimed a source close to draftheadquarters.com which was basically saying he had a source close to himself :lol:

In his defense he was the first to report that Cam was our #1 target.

Of course if we go out and draft Dareus he will have some serious egg on his face :lol:

Yeah, I make no claims about his credibility either way - just posting this because I found it interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wonder what Buffalo would offer to jump to number one and take Cam. Flip ones, a second and perhaps a late pick sixth rounder maybe. Then have choice of who is left Dareus or PP after Denver selection

Yeah, if Buffalo is so high on Cam I'm not sure why they wouldn't make a big-time offer to jump one spot and get him?

Heck, we might swap 1's with them and take their 2nd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wonder what Buffalo would offer to jump to number one and take Cam. Flip ones, a second and perhaps a late pick sixth rounder maybe. Then have choice of who is left Dareus or PP after Denver selection

If we are assuming Zobel is correct I imagine it will take no less than this years 1st AND next years 1st.

I think we are willing to trade down but not looking to trade down. Therefore we will ask a lot in return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to an analyst I was speaking with yesterday, he said 0% chance we trade the pick at this time because of the risk of no draft next year. Trading to our spot would require future picks which have no value currently. Also in regards to the Denver trade, he said 1% lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my question is that if carolina likes cam enough to select him first overall then they obviously think he can be a franchise QB...you do not pass on potential franchise QB's unless you have one...we do not...if we are indeed sold on newton it would have to be one hell of a deal to move us out of that number 1 spot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Going from the 32nd to 27th ranked QB is a huge achievement indeed.
    • I do expect the offense to fall back to earth next year if everything stays the same.  It is kinda like how the Panthers and even now the Chiefs won in the past.  Winning many close, coin flip games.  It never lasts from season to season usually. 
    • Biased is one way of putting it. The NFL is an entertainment product in the strictest legal sense. Although I might yell it out on game days, I do not believe the games are outright “rigged” meaning there is one team that is going to win no matter what happens. It’s impossible. There’s too much variance in the game that can prevent a truly rigged game from happening unless there was cooperation from many parties involved. What I am thoroughly convinced happens is that the NFL and referees “manage” the games towards certain outcomes. And that is done primarily through referee crew choice however I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s more going on behind the curtain.  The NFL uses the officials statistical tendencies to call penalties is to keep games close to drive user engagement. For example, If a crew tends to call more false start penalties, and there’s a game between a heavy pass offense where the NFL would like to manufacture a close game where it might have potential to be a blowout, then they’ll assign a crew that will slow that offense down and keep the game close.  There is an insane amount of marketing and now sports betting money that is married to the NFL economic ecosystem. To think this whole system is fair when the referee union has no outward accountability structure for poor performance is just naive. It’s closer to the WWE than outward appearances suggest, but it’s not a fully scripted outcome either. So for those who say “stop watching” if you don’t want to watch a “rigged” game, it’s an entertainment product. You can still be entertained by it, even if it’s not as fair as a truly merit based sporting event. 
×
×
  • Create New...