Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

3 QBs with similarities to Cam


MHS831

Recommended Posts

From an article by Matt Faulconer(Redskins Featured Columnist) on April 19, 2011

Andre Ware, QB Houston: While Ware was a very athletic quarterback, he did not use his mobility to his advantage much in college, but showed it off a bit more at the NFL level, averaging nearly six yards per carry.

Both Ware and Newton played their college games in quarterback friendly systems, which made it very easy for them to read defenses. In both systems, the quarterback was only responsible for making one to two reads before finding an open man, or in Newton's case, taking off with the football.

Playing in a quarterback friendly system, both were able to put up huge numbers, and both would eventually win the Heisman Trophy.

Akili Smith, QB, Oregon: Akili Smith exploded onto the scene after a phenomenal 1998 season at Oregon. Like Newton, Smith was a one-year wonder in college. He had a tremendous senior season, where he threw for 30 touchdowns and had only seven interceptions.

Before his incredible senior season, Smith also ran into some off-the-field concerns. While he did not get in trouble for cheating like Newton did, he did have academic issues and nearly flunked out of Oregon. Smith also had major red flags, as he was arrested twice.

Smith had a strong arm, like Newton's, but flashed better accuracy. Smith was not quite as athletic, but certainly showed some of the game-changing abilities that Newton has shown over the past year.

The main comparison with Smith and Newton is that they both have had incidents off-the-field that raise major red flags (Smith with his arrests, Newton with his pay-for-play allegations and cheating); however, both have the talents that scouts drool over.

Vince Young, QB, Texas: They both have the ability to create plays with their legs, but they have a different overall game.

Young does not have the size or the strength that Cam Newton has, but he is lighter on his feet. Young is more of a shifty runner while Newton has no problem bowling over defenders.

Both of these quarterbacks have concerns about their ability to convert to a pro-style offense. Both of them played a lot of shotgun in college and one-read offenses. By "one-read offenses," it means that they would look at their primary receiver, and if nothing is there, they would take off and run.

They are both two of the most athletically gifted quarterbacks the game has ever seen, right along with Michael Vick.

However, Newton has a much better arm than Young. Young was inaccurate in college and does not have as strong of an arm as Newton.

Both have problems with their accuracy due to their throwing motion. Young has a sidearm motion, while Newton struggles to shift his weight properly and rushes his passes before setting his feet.

Vince Young is the most comparable player to him at the NFL level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just passing the info along. The author never references color or race--he compares numbers and ability.

I compare him to:

Akili Smith

Vince Young

Andre Ware

Brian Bosworth (LB)

The Golden Calf of Bristol

Ryan Leaf

Mike Vick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From an article by Matt Faulconer(Redskins Featured Columnist) on April 19, 2011

Andre Ware, QB Houston: While Ware was a very athletic quarterback, he did not use his mobility to his advantage much in college, but showed it off a bit more at the NFL level, averaging nearly six yards per carry.

Both Ware and Newton played their college games in quarterback friendly systems, which made it very easy for them to read defenses. In both systems, the quarterback was only responsible for making one to two reads before finding an open man, or in Newton's case, taking off with the football.

Playing in a quarterback friendly system, both were able to put up huge numbers, and both would eventually win the Heisman Trophy.

Akili Smith, QB, Oregon: Akili Smith exploded onto the scene after a phenomenal 1998 season at Oregon. Like Newton, Smith was a one-year wonder in college. He had a tremendous senior season, where he threw for 30 touchdowns and had only seven interceptions.

Before his incredible senior season, Smith also ran into some off-the-field concerns. While he did not get in trouble for cheating like Newton did, he did have academic issues and nearly flunked out of Oregon. Smith also had major red flags, as he was arrested twice.

Smith had a strong arm, like Newton's, but flashed better accuracy. Smith was not quite as athletic, but certainly showed some of the game-changing abilities that Newton has shown over the past year.

The main comparison with Smith and Newton is that they both have had incidents off-the-field that raise major red flags (Smith with his arrests, Newton with his pay-for-play allegations and cheating); however, both have the talents that scouts drool over.

Vince Young, QB, Texas: They both have the ability to create plays with their legs, but they have a different overall game.

Young does not have the size or the strength that Cam Newton has, but he is lighter on his feet. Young is more of a shifty runner while Newton has no problem bowling over defenders.

Both of these quarterbacks have concerns about their ability to convert to a pro-style offense. Both of them played a lot of shotgun in college and one-read offenses. By "one-read offenses," it means that they would look at their primary receiver, and if nothing is there, they would take off and run.

They are both two of the most athletically gifted quarterbacks the game has ever seen, right along with Michael Vick.

However, Newton has a much better arm than Young. Young was inaccurate in college and does not have as strong of an arm as Newton.

Both have problems with their accuracy due to their throwing motion. Young has a sidearm motion, while Newton struggles to shift his weight properly and rushes his passes before setting his feet.

Vince Young is the most comparable player to him at the NFL level.

Vince Young is struggling because he is a head case not because his skill set is lacking or he doesn't understand defenses. Even with the issues he has a winning record and 2 pro bowl appearances. Seems to me that if Newton can be an improved version of Young without the drama and better passing skills, then we will have found our franchise guy. Same athleticism as Young with better consistency and better intangibles. Of course you take it.

I envision Newton being a more athletic stouter version of Randall Cunningham with better accuracy. And I could live with that as well. Newton won't be sitting all day in the pocket but using his legs to buy time to throw and run when necessary. A vertical passer who is elusive.

I would be happy if he ends up as a more athletic version of Roethlisburger as well. Similar to the comparisons made by the man who has worked extensively with both. For every negative comparison you can make, there is a positve one which is just compelling. If we already had a QB we could count on, no reason to pick Newton. But we don't and haven't for some time. We need to find our guy by all means possible with the draft being the cheapest if a CBA agreement gets done with a rookie wage scale. Without one, it will be more expensive. Another reason to draft a QB because there is no one else worth close to that amount this year. If not Newton than Gabbert, whoever. But a QB nonetheless. Othrewise I can't see a corner, wide receiver, or defensive tackle worth 50 million guaranteed and yet if we stay where we are, we will surely spend that. Even moving down to 3 or 4 will cost 30 or 40 million.

We have to hope there is a rookie wage scale and an agreement which makes whoever we pick reasonable financially. Especially if it is a QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only compare the black qbs to another black qb. Never elevate him by comparing him to a good or elite white qb. Leave the pedestal be. If you do compare him to a white qb, make sure he's a bust or a scrub like Leaf or Crouch. Do this my child, and it will keep you safe!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only compare the black qbs to another black qb. Never elevate him by comparing him to a good or elite white qb. Leave the pedestal be. If you do compare him to a white qb, make sure he's a bust or a scrub like Leaf or Crouch. Do this my child, and it will keep you safe!

You figured it out. All the white folks gathered together decades ago and decided to keep the black QBs down by not comparing them to whitey. Time for a new strategy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only compare the black qbs to another black qb. Never elevate him by comparing him to a good or elite white qb. Leave the pedestal be. If you do compare him to a white qb, make sure he's a bust or a scrub like Leaf or Crouch. Do this my child, and it will keep you safe!

y u mad though?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ware and Smith, just couldn't get it done. However, Young has all of the tools to get it done and actually did get it done at certain points. It's just very unfortunate that his head is full of things such as suicide, depression, etc... and not football.

Ware and Smith did not win consistently and by consistently I mean win a National Championship.

Comparison wise, I think Young’s athleticism and Josh Freeman’s (not mentioned in the article) build is what we are looking at when we see Cam Newton. Cam Newton’s downfall is indeed reading the defense because Auburn’s offense is very, very, quarterback friendly. However, Newton has showed he has ability to understand defense’s at a significant level. Newton’s accuracy and most notably his deep ball accuracy is above average whether people tend to recognize that or not. The big question is reading and understanding the defenses and going through his progressions. The thing is, we were told that Newton and two other quarterbacks (I can’t recall who they are) were given parts of the Carolina Panthers playbook. If Newton is the pick, it is because he has showed promise in his interview and does indeed understand the Panthers schemes and playbook.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To understand why a player with all the tools to be successful in the NFL would bust is remarkably difficult.  While Isaiah Simmons has had a disappointing career to this point, there is a reason he is back in Carolina.  Yes, special teams are important and he does well in that role.  My intent is to examine in what situations he has been successful and develop a theory about the reason he might have experienced success in some capacity vs. the times he has flopped.  Is he a CB?  A Safety?  A LB?  An Edge?  No.  He has been all of them at some point and has yet to settle into a position.  I think the Panthers will do the same thing.  I think I know (besides special teams) how they might use him effectively on defense.  First, think of Simmons as a unicorn. Create a position that he does not have to fit into, but one that fits into his skill sets.  I think we need to designate him as our Big Nickel, and then we need to modify that position into something of a rover, for lack of a better term.  He is a hybrid--but lets not make him the hybrid, let's make the position the hybrid.  Isaiah Simmons has been most effective in the NFL as a Big Nickel and on special teams, specifically in sub-packages where he can leverage his elite speed (4.39 40-yard dash) without the constant physical demands of a traditional linebacker.  A big nickel is a third safety, designed to match up with the big TEs, basically, and provide better run support.   Based on what I have read, Simmons is slowed when he has to know the Xs and Os and the position is focused on complex interpretations that may require adjustments in certain situations, etc.  He excels in special teams, for example, because he is turned loose and he simple reacts to what he sees in front of him, it seems.   I think the Panthers may create a big nickel role that turns him loose on defense.       Simmons has been in the league for about 6 years and has been issued five playbooks.  His position has shifted in an effort to find where he could best fit in.  Getting back to basics, here is a chart that demonstrates how much more effective he was as a big nickel than a traditional LB, that required more reading blocking and run game schemes:     Last season, Ransom was the big nickel, the Panthers are high on him and not looking to replace him by any means.  It is my theory that Ransom will be used alongside Moehrig in some situations.  He can also provide depth behind Moehrig.  It is also my opinion that Simmons may not be the ideal fit for every situation involving the big nickel.  Simmons could be used, for example, as a blitzing big nickel who can cover the flat and stuff the run, while Ransom may be the better lock-down TE coverage guy--I dunno.  But I see Simmons playing a bigger role on D.   Here is a comparison between Ransom and Simmons: Lathan Ransom: A 2025 fourth-round pick, he is viewed as a starter candidate to provide security opposite safety Tre'von Moehrig, with the Panthers high on his potential. Isaiah Simmons: Recently re-signed (March 2026), Simmons has thrived as a special teams ace but is considered a prime candidate to develop into a big nickel linebacker/safety hybrid due to his unique versatility. Context: The Panthers' defense under Ejiro Evero requires safety depth, and both players bring different strengths to that position group. Throw in Nick Scott, a pure free safety who just signed, it is starting to get a bit clearer.  Does this mean we will not draft a S?  Not at all.  Who do we have to give depth at FS?  Let's hope its Scott. It is my view that Simmons needs to find one or two things he does well on this defense and focus on that and not everything else.  What are his natural talents (6'4" 238 and runs sub 4.4--who does that?  Can you not make that work for you?)  This tells me the problem is mental.  Too many cooks in the kitchen.  Instead of asking him to do everything behind the DL, let's get him to do one thing that aligns with his skill set and history of success.  A situational big nickel/rover seems to be a fit.    
    • Who had us getting arguably the best receiver in the draft last April? Dan believes in sticking with his board. That's what the Panthers will do. It's that simple.
×
×
  • Create New...