Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Possiblity of Newton Starting


Recommended Posts

I am of the belief that Newton will NOT start at all in 2011. However, I replied to a post on FB and it blew up. So I thought I would get the Huddles opinion.

What is the chance of Newton Starting?

You don't draft a QB #1 over all and not start him when you were the last in every QB stat in the NFL last year..................good God! You must be a wine and cheese fan! lol!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't draft a QB #1 over all and not start him when you were the last in every QB stat in the NFL last year..................good God! You must be a wine and cheese fan! lol!

Thats because typically the qb you draft number 1 is able to run an nfl offense. Cam can't even draw up a very simplistic play from Auburn on a white board, he has a looonnnngggg way to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't draft a QB #1 over all and not start him when you were the last in every QB stat in the NFL last year..................good God! You must be a wine and cheese fan! lol!

Has nothing to do with Wine and cheese... A$$ hole.

Newton is going to be a stud I have no doubt. He has zero knowledge of the pro game and terminology. They used Flash Cards to call plays at AU. Though those may have been complex he will have to learn a new system.

While you think you know it all conventional wisdom is that HE WON'T Start. While you have your opinion calling me names is totally unnecessary!!! Would you get up at 4am in the morning to follow your team?

Doubt so, STFU and Kiss my A$$.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has nothing to do with Wine and cheese... A$$ hole.

Newton is going to be a stud I have no doubt. He has zero knowledge of the pro game and terminology. They used Flash Cards to call plays at AU. Though those may have been complex he will have to learn a new system.

While you think you know it all conventional wisdom is that HE WON'T Start. While you have your opinion calling me names is totally unnecessary!!! Would you get up at 4am in the morning to follow your team?

Doubt so, STFU and Kiss my A$$.

Never called you a name. Just said you were a wine and cheese fan.................however..............now I will. You are a MORON if you think Newton will not start! Yes he has zero knowledge of the pro game terminology. That is why you will be in the bottom of the NFC south for years to come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never called you a name. Just said you were a wine and cheese fan.................however..............now I will. You are a MORON if you think Newton will not start! Yes he has zero knowledge of the pro game terminology. That is why you will be in the bottom of the NFC south for years to come.

I have the power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how armchair GMs have it all figured out.. considering NFL teams are paying them 0 digits, we have some real guru's around here...

take heed to their words.. and become dumber for listening..

if Cam is lucky, he'll have an opportunity to sit a year and let the game come to him. using the argument that he was picked #1 only ensures you handle him with care.

Not throw him to the wolves because you have some stupid philosophy as if you truly know what the NFL is like..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the power.

lol I was wondering why his rep disappeared in one refresh.

Newton will start I think. He has the athleticism to be the most effective QB on the roster. What matters is if he relies on that athleticism as a crutch, or if he works hard and takes his game to the next level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...