Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mcshay "Drafting him (Cam) was a gamble, and thats why this franchise is where it is"


Awesomeness!!

Recommended Posts

Basically he said we take too many gambles, which is why we sucked last year. I literally spit out my Pepsi, because this guy obviously has no fuging clue what he is talking about. Jerry Richardson might be the most conservative guy in the NFL. JR thinks staying up past 8:30 is extreme. Of course, the opposite of JR is Al Davis, but thats another story. What I took from this is that these guys clearly have no clue what they are talking about. From now on I will put no stock what so ever in anything this guy says. Thats pathetic, and indicates a lack of knowledge on his part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we are where we are now because we haven't gambled on a franchise QB in a long time.

(scratches head) (very confused)

Ummmm... Didn't we draft Clausen last year???

Wow... Some people just won't ever get it!

It may be time to test each member on the huddle on basic football knowledge, as well as Panthers knowledge.

With those results, we should then be categorized, so that the slower people cant talk to the faster people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sometimes you have to gamble to win. I'm not a Cam supporter and I don't like the pick, but I will admit that Cam has tons of potential.

The athletic skills are there, the desire to win is there, the leadership potential is there. I just have doubts have his work ethic and his focus. I would feel most comfortable with bringing in a vet and letting Cam sit. Starting him will almost guarantee a losing season and, like Clausen who was started by Fox in desperation, only frustrate Cam which may cause him to lose his focus.

Cam knows how to win. But does he know how to lose?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

(scratches head) (very confused)

Ummmm... Didn't we draft Clausen last year???

Wow... Some people just won't ever get it!

It may be time to test each member on the huddle on basic football knowledge, as well as Panthers knowledge.

With those results, we should then be categorized, so that the slower people cant talk to the faster people.

Clausen wasn't drafted to be the Franchise. He was just drafted because he was there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it wasn't for Gruden, I probably would've just started following the ticker on my phone.

McShay and Kiper are such tools.

Moreso McShay, Kiper's really lost his elitist attitude in recent years for the most part.

Or it just pales in comparison to how bad McShay's is.

"McShay: What? You didn't do what I said? But But But... I work for ESPN..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I will as soon as you withdraw your fandom from the Patriots. Informative threads are great but all of these estrogen and emotion driven threads you start are ridiculous.
    • Will be there tonight and expect nothing from the Canes. They are soft and won't go after anyone, nor will they respond when, not if, Florida starts bullying them. Not to mention Freddie is in net. I fear this will be an ass-kicking.  
    • Is this not a bit contradictory?  Also surely if any of us are smart enough to evaluate what we're seeing in real time, a former NFL QB can at least manage the same.  Especially considering he's basing his analysis on hours (maybe generous?) of reviewing All-22 footage which he can play back over and over again, focusing each time on different position groups, match-ups, progressions, etc. which is simply impossible for a fan to fully assess in real time.  Unless you're actually at the game, we basically only get the QB/O-line in frame during the broadcast and even in that limited window of the field, there is simply too much happening.  I'm usually broadly focusing on Bryce, maybe peeping the footwork (or lack thereof) and just the overall pocket and whether there is any pressure coming.  I'm not able to watch every individual one-on-one o-line match-up on top of it to see who got beat, who didn't pick up a blitz, which o-lineman didn't shift to help double-team, or whatever else. I think the truth is somewhere in between (as is almost always the case).  Knowing the play call, audible, etc. is pretty important when judging individual performances, which is why we should always take PFF grades with a grain of salt.  But yeah we can also get a pretty good overall sense of how a player is performing just from watching the game on the couch on Sundays.  I still think there's a lot of value in a review video like this.  As long as you have the bare minimum media literacy to take the interesting insights while also acknowledging inherent biases from a video like this (i.e. obviously focusing on the good over the bad).
×
×
  • Create New...