Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

All this Cam vs. Clausen talk


TruCatzFan

Recommended Posts

Is completely overblown in my opinion! I've been hearing about it and reading about it on every sports network since the draft. Just this am Mike and Mike were debating whether Clausen should give Cam the #... Last night on ESPN Keyshawn Johnson and Steve Young argued about whether or not Clausen should give the # to Cam in the new Audibles show!

Basically, I think that they're already overblowing this whole thing and I don't even think it's that big of an issue! I'm just tired of the mainstream media taking something small about our team and overblowing it into something that it's not!

Am I alone in thinking like this? Weigh in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blaine already said he was going to wear number 11 in Jacksonville. They dont expect Sims-Walker back. They gave him the jersey and everything.
bring him here.

i'm just glad that we've got a QB that players will be excited about playing with and a coach that people really respect. should see the level of FA talent brought in rise significantly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On WFNZ this morning, Hurney said Clausen wanted # 7 last year but Baker wouldn't give it up, so now it's a 3-way thing this year because Clausen wants # 7 in order to give up # 2.

IMO, Baker is a friggin punter - take his number and reassign it to Clausen so Cam can have # 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On WFNZ this morning, Hurney said Clausen wanted # 7 last year but Baker wouldn't give it up, so now it's a 3-way thing this year because Clausen wants # 7 in order to give up # 2.

IMO, Baker is a friggin punter - take his number and reassign it to Clausen so Cam can have # 2.

easy fix, Cam won't have Clausen money coming in.....Cam pays Baker and everyone walks away happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the pecking order. If Clausen couldn't get his number than I don't think Newton should. Keyshawn and Dilfer were right, Clausen needs to be assertive and tell him that it's his number and nobody can take it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the pecking order. If Clausen couldn't get his number than I don't think Newton should. Keyshawn and Dilfer were right, Clausen needs to be assertive and tell him that it's his number and nobody can take it.

too late.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, it's not like Cam made that T-shirt himself! It was made for him by the team... I'm just sayin guys... This feud that media is creating is ALREADY old!! It's between them, Clausen has already said and I quote " It's mine for now, we'll see what happens"

I could care less if Cam and Jimmy wear 98 and 99... As long as they compete with one another making them both better QB's!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I enjoy being truthful. Although that means being unbiased. Which most on here are incapable of being unbiased. 
    • It looks like the Bucks and Giannis are headed for a divorce. He says he's ready to play and the Bucks say that he has told them he isn't. It really doesn't matter except that it likely means the end for Giannis in Milwaukee. He's 31 years old, but still an elite producer.  So, as GM, would you go after him this offseason? Remember, the Hornets have two 1st round picks this year and potentially THREE first round picks next year. What would a trade look like?
    • I agree with you, if all things are equal--assuming we are on the same page as to what that means.  If a DT and OT are there at 19 and you have them equal, which do you take? The DT would be rotational and get 25 snaps a game or so, and the OT is probably a reserve for most of the season.  What if Walker plays out of his mind and Ickey comes back strong? To me, there are just too many variables at T and Morgan met the needs for 2 starters.  Nothing about that screams lets "go OT in round 1" to me. I could see an Edge or a DT at 19 before I see OT.  I could see a TE or S before an OT--and I (personally) would rather have an OT over DT, Edge, TE, or S--but I do not see the logic.  In fact, CB is a position that resembles OT--who do we have behind our starters and are we happy with Smith-Wade?  A CB would be on the field more than a reserve OT.  How is the Walker at LT situation different than the the Bryce situation? He is basically on a 1-year deal and if he is injured, Forsythe becomes Pickett.  Would you take Simpson in the draft?  Dont get me wrong--I usually agree with you  and I get your point.  I am an OL guru--but I just do not see this particular group of Tackles making us better than Walker.  In addition, I think we can address OT once the Ickey situation clears up.  Short arms, poor run blocking, issues with strength--I am simply not impressed with the OTs.  For clarity, "developmental" refers to players who are still a year or two away from starting.  We are all developmental, but there are prospects who need a season to transition to the pro game. I see 1--maybe 2 OTs who could step into a starting role right now. In college, for example, taking snaps under center requires a different approach than blocking for the shotgun.  There is less to learn if you play a position that does not require much adjustment to transition to the NFL.
×
×
  • Create New...