Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who will the Panthers bring in to help on offense?


jarhead

Recommended Posts

i don't know about who they will bring in but these guys are entirely possible and likely.

sidney rice

malcom floyd

braylon edwards

lance moore

more likely one of the top three. chud has experience with floyd and edwards. rice is a local boy. all three fit the mold of the big receiver that has been used a lot by chud/norv turner.

i'd also be looking at top OG candidates and we may also go after a top RT as well, depending on how well otah is doing.

i don't see much past that, mainly because not much is needed. i have very little doubt that richardson will open up the purse strings. rivera and chud are going to be able to get the guys they want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We could do a Vincent Jackson for Steve Smith swap of disgruntled receivers. Some offensive linemen to give that unit depth and five legitimate starters. And maybe upgrade at fullback as Fiametta hasn't dominated.

FB won't play a bigr role like it did with fox. i don't see us using more than one back in the backfield much at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FB won't play a bigr role like it did with fox. i don't see us using more than one back in the backfield much at all.

I'm talking about somebody to compete with or replace Fiametta. I doubt we'll keep two, but fullback was an important position for Chud when his offense worked. I think a lot of people just remember the big passing plays that year, but they had a lot of success running the ball out of an I formation with Vickers and Jamal Lewis during the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we will get a new WR too but I think we are gonna lose Smith so at best that will be a wash.

There are ways to add to a roster and improve the talent on a roster without exchanging players though and it can come from things like growing up and taking advantage of more experience, getting a coach anxious to make a name for himself, getting our players back healthy, or having them work in a system that suits them better.

I don't see big splashes on O.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we can land Coefield, V Jackson and a nice vet QB I will be very happy. CB would be nice but seems only superstars FAs that are worth anything Panthers never sign them, who knows though with all the money JR saved and players he cut it's probably possible to sign them all.

Panthers need to resign before doing anything in FA IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we will get a new WR too but I think we are gonna lose Smith so at best that will be a wash.

There are ways to add to a roster and improve the talent on a roster without exchanging players though and it can come from things like growing up and taking advantage of more experience, getting a coach anxious to make a name for himself, getting our players back healthy, or having them work in a system that suits them better.

I don't see big splashes on O.

I agree I see FA being use more for Def. not O. Maybe a WR if Smith is gone and a vet QB. But most of FA money will be spent on resigning our core players and Def upgrades at DT and CB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is going to be such an insane FA market. The CBA gets signed and 5 minutes later it's a bidding frenzy. Teams will want to sign their target FAs ASAP, especially if the lockout doesn't end soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...