Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Modern Warfare is back (trailer)

jtnc

By jtnc,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

tarheelblue89 Newbie

tarheelblue89

Posted
Posted

Like someone else said, I'm waiting for Battle Field, COD and their developers are greedy charging fugging 20 bucks for those maps, when BF usually have theirs for free.

$15 not $20.

So basically your basis on saying why BF is better then COD is because they make stuff free? lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jtnc Newbie

jtnc

Posted
  • Author
Posted

$15 not $20.

So basically your basis on saying why BF is better then COD is because they make stuff free? lol

No, it's because I already pay 60 dollars for the fugging game, then you release extra maps 2 months after the release and expect me to pay 15 dollars? And then you release ANOTHER map pack after the release of the first one and again another 15 dollars for some fugging maps? How about some extra guns or ranks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mattiekrome Rookie

Mattiekrome

Posted
Posted

Meh, but I'll still pick it up as well as BF3 when it comes out.

Biggest gripe with any Modern Warfare game is the melee/knifing. Sure melee combat needs to be a part of any FPS game, but slow it down and make it more of a skill as opposed to just an unrealistically fast reaction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

Meh, but I'll still pick it up as well as BF3 when it comes out.

Biggest gripe with any Modern Warfare game is the melee/knifing. Sure melee combat needs to be a part of any FPS game, but slow it down and make it more of a skill as opposed to just an unrealistically fast reaction.[/QUOTE]

you mean you don't like the fact you can unload half a clip into someone and they can stab you with a knife from 10 ft away?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zaximus Grand Master

Zaximus

Posted
Posted

I don't mind the map packs, if they are decent and thought out. I know they make them when they make the other maps that ship with the game, but oh well, this is the way business is now. You can still play without buying them.

MW1 was the best of the CoD games, by far. World at War failed so hard early with glitches etc, most went back to CoD4. MW2 was a good game if you took out knifing and too much attention on killstreaks (and the bad glitches and stuff obviously). I still think MW2 was better than Black Ops, the hit detection was WAY better, the gun selection I felt was better too. Black Ops annoyed me from day one, and that's probably why I gave up on it, putting a whole clip into someone to have them turn around and blast you.

I'll still probably get both of these games eventually. Never having played a BF game though I'm sure that will be more exciting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Joscott Newbie

Joscott

Posted
Posted

Not sure if this was posted, but it talks about adding more to the Spec Ops campaign this time around:

USA Today

After a few waves, the attack dogs became suicide bomber dogs that exploded a few seconds after you shot them. The next wave brought the kamikaze soldiers who exploded similarly.

"You definitely have to change up your strategy as the enemy changes up," Bowling said afterward. "Obviously how you fight the kamakazi dudes is different from how you fight the normal dudes and how you fight a dog is different from a dude and how you fight juggernauts, they are not only big and armored, so they will just brute force come at you. But they each have their own way of being taken out effectively."

So basically what to take away from it, Spec Ops will have it's own rank system, more missions and zombie hoard without the zombies. I'm always a fan of more things to do although the kamakazi dogs seem like a pain in the butt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zaximus Grand Master

Zaximus

Posted
Posted

It's kind of Infinity Ward. All the main people that made CoD4 and MW2 left IW shortly after MW2 was released and created Respawn, they are making their own game. It's basically just IW in name. The IW people now are the terrible people who "supported" MW2. You know, all the glitching/hacking/cheating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Panthers Top 30 Visits and Draft Tracker

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I appreciate the honesty in your posts--I am not sure Canales is rusing(?) because I don't think we are good enough yet to draft players for depth on day 1.  I do think we are in limbo, fwiw.  At 19, I think you are drafting second rounders in the first.
    • strato
      It is time to Consider the Likelihood of WR at #19

      By strato · Posted

      We are in a unique situation here. Just my opinion. Three things: Moton’s playing health has been gradually declining as he is aging, while his contract is a drag on the payroll.  Something will give with him sooner than later but I think 2026 could be it.  So.. need a right tackle by 2027. At the latest.    Icky’s individual situation is unique as well. They would have had an extension done by now if not for the injury. We only have him for this year. With no assurance he will ever be the same player.  It would be reckless just to assume. Now we have Walker for one year. And that is a major relief. Maybe he is the answer, but the team that knows him best let him go and it was cheap for us to sign him. So how much did they value him?    We look to be needing two tackles by 2027.  And have poo for depth this year as well. So anyway we could draft a guy for 2027 RT and groom him this year, and see how Icky does, and act as needed in 2027. Spread out filling the two holes over 2 years.    Then I remember, hey if Bryce doesn’t get a Lot more consistent do they extend him? Hoping not, if he isn’t really good.    So then we are looking at the 2027 draft which people say is gonna be loaded with QBs. If we need a LT and a QB what is the pick gonna get spent on?   Taking into account the recovery success rates cited here on the Icky surgery, you might want to plan for him to not be the same player. rather than assume he will be and get caught with your pants down.  It is a tough situation.    And factor in that it is critically important to protect this QB, always, but especially this year where it is said to be make or break. And how you might feel about that.    All of it points to a real possibility that these things converge in the negative, like Bruce sucks and Icky is not the same. In that case if you want to be assured of getting LT secured, the only place you can do that through the draft could be very well be 2026 1st round.     For me, I would like to err on the side of caution.  Cover for these outcomes. It wouldn’t be fun. Added benefit is if we do have a tackle go down this year we will have a guy there. Because I don’t know what we have now.  
    • flagfootballcoach28
      Mike Kaye: “I would keep a pretty close eye on {KC Concepcion}.”

      By flagfootballcoach28 · Posted

      I agree. In a perfect world I wouldn’t want to draft another WR, but in this draft it’s fine based on the value of who will be there at #19.  All of the top tier guys worth pick #19 at other positions of need will be long gone. Only exception is Dillon Thieneman, but he’s almost a shoe in for the Vikings as the Harrison Smith replacement. Some posters on here want to draft an OT just to check a box without realizing the concerns and risk that comes along with said player. Sounds like XL to me… desperately drafting need… KC is a pretty safe player.  Produced all 3 years in college and last year in the SEC vs a lot of top corners in this years draft. He single handily dropped the South Carolina CB Brandon Cisse’s draft stock with how bad he abused him.   Sometimes it’s best to try and hit a double instead of going for the home run. This draft screams “go for the double”. Esp in the first. 
×
×
  • Create New...