Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2010 Carolina Panthers Position Review: Defensive End


rayzor

Recommended Posts

via derp

some interesting insights...namely tyler brayton vs. everette brown.

brayton was pathetic. 14 starts and only came up with 22 tackles and no sacks?

meanwhile brown and hardy had few snaps taken in comparison to brayton, but wound up being a whole lot more productive. brown had 25 tackles, 3.5 sacks, 1 FF and 1 INT. hardy had 30 tackles, 3 sacks and 2 FFs.

now it's popular to hate on brown, esp. when you see a rookie doing just as good as he does, but that hate might be a bit misplaced and we might not be getting the whole picture.

from the article...

Everette Brown

2010 Statistics (2 game starter): 25 tackles, 3.5 sacks, 1 FF, 1 INT

Definitely a player whose taken his lumps from fans over the last two years, we are fast approaching the 'put up or shut up' time for Everette Brown. At times I definitely agree with the masses that he has been underwhelming, but the fact is that on a per-snap basis he's trending a lot like Charles Johnson did before he broke out in 2010. Are you ready to be surprised? I was:

According to Football Outsiders' advanced tracking:

- Brown was 15th in the NFL among DEs in overall stop rate (84%)

- Brown was 25th in the NFL among DEs in run stop rate (79%)

So, while he didn't spend a lot of time on the field in 2010, Everette Brown really used his time effectively.

Letter Grade: B

so why didn't brown (or even hardy) get more snaps?

2 things...

1) john fox was still the coach

2) tyler brayton was still on the team

we have seen over and over again throughout the years that fox, unless his hand is forced, is always going to go with the player who has more experience despite that players lack of ability to produce and the more talented player(s) sitting on the bench.

if everette brown isn't living up to the picks that were sacrificed to acquire him, that isn't his fault or hurney's. it's john fox's fault.

now what will likely happen is that tyler brown is history. he isn't under contract. he wasn't supposed to be last year as he was one of the casualties of the house cleaning, but they for some reason decided to bring him back and gave him a one year deal.

we didn't bring in anyone via the draft. beyond johnson (who i have no doubt we will re-sign), brown and hardy, we have hilee taylor and eric norwood. hilee taylor has never been able to take advantage of any opportunities to be on the field. honestly, i forget that he is even on the team half the time. eric norwood has a lot of potential and is supposed to be moving to DE this year.

i can see hilee taylor doing the same thing he's done for years...take up a roster spot, but it might be time for him to move on unless he brings some value as a special teamer.

i'm not sure how many roster spots they are planning to use on the Dline, but do you think we'll go with 5 DEs on the active game day roster? it's hard for me to see more than 4, but that would mean our DE corps would consist of johnson, brown, hardy, and norwood. i think that hardy and brown can do a good job across from johnson, but norwood, although he has a lot of potential, is still an unknown.

if we were to decide to try and have 5 DEs on the game day roster, it would make a lot of sense to bring in someone with a lot more experience. only problem is there isn't a whole lot to choose from in FA. ray edwards is probably going to be too costly and guys like kiwanuka and gholston are the right age for this young team, but both have red flags. guys like shaun ellis, raheem brock, and andre carter have a good bit of experience and a lot of talent, but they are all on the wrong side of 30.

any thoughts on what the best movement would be? go after some younger guy to better the long term competition, or bring in an older guy to make for a better rotation this year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

considering it takes the DLine a few years to acclimate themselves to the NFL, I'm not surprised fans shortsightedness gets in the way..

another point worth raising... intellect and being rational shouldn't be that hard of an attribute to acquire. step it up ladies, you're embarrassing the fanbase.

wasn't it Hardy who was a gunner on ST's for a few plays and was out there making tackles? wtf..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I think the explanation regarding who gets what snaps is are we defending the run or rushing the qb.Fox may have felt Brown was not up to par defending the run and Brayton was the better option.That can explain why Brayton had few sacks.The bottom line is hardy or Brown need to be a 3 down players and Brayton is getting old.Not trying to defend Brayton because not only did he not have any sacks his tackles were off as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks rayzor, that's what i been saying. for a starting DE to have 0 sacks is horse crap.i dont care how good he is vs the run, the DE job is to also get to the QB and he didnt do that much this past year. give his snaps to Hardy and Brown and see what happens...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the thing that was the most surprising to me was how well brown did against the run. i expected him to be ok against the pass, but 25th most effective in the league against the run is pretty impressive. not sure i would want to make him a 3 down guy, but i feel better about him being in the rotation knowing that he can do well with whatever comes at him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt we bring in another DE unless someone in free agency is a real deal. At this point we are likely to keep at least 5- Johnson, Hardy, Brown and 2 of the rest- Brayton, Norwood, Taylor. We will need to rotate at least 4 and have at least 1 replacement for injuries. Brayton had a down year last but we didn't get rid of Peppers when he had 2 sacks in 2007 so I don't think we should kick Brayton to the curb. He is good against the run and decent getting pressure. I suspect he will be improved in McDermott's defense.

I think that Johnson will be on the right side and either Hardy, Brown or Brayton will be on the left. I would like to think Hardy will be the guy but he needs to work on his run defense. Brown is also coming into his own this year and should make big strides. This defense is very DE friendly so honestly I think they will have a big year across the board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I think the explanation regarding who gets what snaps is are we defending the run or rushing the qb.Fox may have felt Brown was not up to par defending the run and Brayton was the better option.That can explain why Brayton had few sacks.The bottom line is hardy or Brown need to be a 3 down players and Brayton is getting old.Not trying to defend Brayton because not only did he not have any sacks his tackles were off as well.

This and if I'm not mistaken, Brayton got hurt in the 1st preseason game against Baltimore (knee) and this may have contributed to his lack of production. However, I wouldn't be suprised if Brayton is the odd man out; we'll be okay with CJ, Hardy, Brown, and Norwood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt we bring in another DE unless someone in free agency is a real deal. At this point we are likely to keep at least 5- Johnson, Hardy, Brown and 2 of the rest- Brayton, Norwood, Taylor. We will need to rotate at least 4 and have at least 1 replacement for injuries. Brayton had a down year last but we didn't get rid of Peppers when he had 2 sacks in 2007 so I don't think we should kick Brayton to the curb. He is good against the run and decent getting pressure. I suspect he will be improved in McDermott's defense.

I think that Johnson will be on the right side and either Hardy, Brown or Brayton will be on the left. I would like to think Hardy will be the guy but he needs to work on his run defense. Brown is also coming into his own this year and should make big strides. This defense is very DE friendly so honestly I think they will have a big year across the board.

we had a lot more invested in peppers at the time than we do brayton, in which we have nothing invested in at the moment. he's a free agent this year.

if we can find a more talented and younger prospect in FA, we need to be doing that. i can't believe that brayton is the best available option for us.

i would love to see us take a chance on gholston. dude's bust is more due to being miscast from the beginning. he's a 4-3 DE, or at least that was what he was in college. mangini tried turning him into a 3-4 OLB which was a mistake (one of many mangini made. remember the effect that turning to a 3-4 had on vilma?). then ryan turned him into a 3-4 DE. ryan said that gholston improved in that role, but he wasn't sure that he would so they brought in someone who was more experienced and better suited as a 3-4 DE.

he's never played in a 4-3 at the pro level and he's still young. he could excel there in a way that he's never been able to do with the jets. he might not live up to his being drafted 6th overall, but since we aren't the team that did it, that wouldn't matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Took cash out for 84 before the usa game. Didn't like the corners. If this one hits will probably put 100 on Arizona to cover and the over against Purdue 
    • This is so much more than rankings.  Got tired of same old topics.  I see the thread beginning, "Breaking News: Panthers...." and then I open it and read the complete title of the thread "...OT Jordan Gross Retires."  So here is something to chew on:  Don't hurt my feelings.  LZ rates the bounty of talent at each position and I provide a quote from his article.  It changed my approach. https://www.nfl.com/news/ranking-11-position-groups-in-2026-nfl-draft-from-strongest-to-weakest-edge-rusher-linebacker-loaded #1: Edge: Lance predicts the Edge position will, once again, dominate the first round and it is the strongest position.  If the Panthers draft an edge on day 1 or day 2, Wow.  Phillips, Scourton, Princely, Jones, along with Hampton, Gipson, and Incoom.  Personally, I think we are going to let the others grab the Edge players forcing other positions to drop to us.  This strategy does not discount the fact that if a stud edge falls to 19… LZ:  “This class figures to provide a strong number of future starters, with as many as 17 players poised to come off the board in the first three rounds, but the quality of depth will trail off on Day 3. The edge defenders will rule the first round.” #2 Linebacker:  The Panthers added a starting Mike ILB in free agency, but the rest of the roster is depth. The need is for an off-ball LB who can cover.  Since it is my opinion that we draft a STARTER here, I would expect a first- or second-round pick  However, he makes a comment about the depth, suggesting that quality players could be found on early day 3. LZ: “Anthony Hill Jr. is a talented three-down option who could go on Day 1, while Jake Golday, CJ Allen and Jacob Rodriguez look like Round 2 selections as potential early starters. The linebacker group stays strong in Rounds 3 and 4, with decent depth stretching into the fifth round.” #3. Interior Offensive Line:  This one surprised me, powered by some guards that could go as early as round 2.  Remember, LZ is rating these positions based on projected starters.  He mentions that Center is strong based on short-armed OTs that will transition to center, claiming that starters can be found into the fifth round.  That is good news for the Panthers, who do not really need an immediate starter, but they need a future starter who can play a few years on a rookie contract. LZ: “Meanwhile, Connor Lew, Sam Hecht, Logan Jones and Brian Parker II could all become future starting centers, while Trey Zuhn III might not be far behind. The number of starters and the depth into Round 5 is what helps this group stand out.” #4. Wide Receiver:   Finding potential starters at WR is probably easier than C, but let’s not assume that WR is not a need in Charlotte.  TMac needs someone who can keep defenses from cheating in coverage.  Coker is very promising, but the others? I get the feeling that they are hoping XL comes around in year 3.  Regardless, if a WR is there that makes them better, they could pull the trigger–again–just not in round 1.  If the Panthers grab a WR, it will be for a 3rd-5th WR, which makes LZ’s comment interesting: LZ:  “In terms of starting talent, this offering is a little softer than those from some recent years, but there will be plenty of quality depth for WR3/4 roles inside of the first five rounds.” #5 Cornerback:  Yes, we have Horn and Jackson (in his final year at age 29) and Smith-Wade has been fairly good. Thornton was the second-rated rookie CB before his injury last year.  Could we use depth at nickel?  An outside CB?  I think we could add both, frankly. Future starters.  I love the nickel from Duke, who is not mentioned.   LZ:  “The depth at wide corner is lacking, but there are some very talented nickelbacks who will step into starting roles fairly quickly, including Avieon Terrell, Treydan Stukes, D'Angelo Ponds and Keionte Scott. It's worth noting that this might be the fastest cornerback group, from top to bottom, that we've ever seen.” #6(T) Safety: This prognosis could be why we re-signed Scott. However, it could also foreshadow why we might take a safety in rounds 1 or 2.  In my view, I think the value at S is not comparable, per round, to the value at other positions.  Remember the comment about moving Smith-Wade to safety?  I wonder if that was a stupid comment or someone in the know spewing inside info.  I want a safety, but I am not crazy about them in this draft. LZ:  “Ballhawking safeties like Bud Clark and A.J. Haulcy offer future starting value in the second round, as does Jalen Kilgore, who is a big, explosive down safety. I'm also a fan of VJ Payne from Kansas State, but in general, this group becomes average, depth-level talent fairly quickly on Day 3.” #6 (T) Tight End:  Sadiq is not described as elite, but could be a first-rounder.  Frankly, from the sounds of this, it is either reach for Sadiq in round 1 or wait until round 3.  I am not seeing a TE in this draft.  I know the Panthers want one, but how much?   LZ: (After Sadiq round 1)--We might not see many second-round TE picks, but this group is fairly deep in Rounds 3 through 5, featuring some solid pass catchers and a very strong run blocker in Sam Roush out of Stanford. The 2026 draft could produce a sneaky-high number of tight ends who earn second NFL contracts.” #8 (T) Defensive Line: This group is hard to gauge, and drafting one where the Panthers pick seems a bit awkward on day 1.  Nobody is worth #19 and the elite DTs will be long gone by #53 or whatever.  However, I like some of the second-tier players.  It seems NTs are abundant, but 3Ts are in short supply.  Maybe a player like Holten or Jackson in round 3 or (sleeper) Capehart around 3-4. LZ:  (Borderline first-rounders:  Banks, McDonald, Woods)  “Beyond that talented trio, the position offers a series of future starters/rotational contributors on Day 2.” #8 (T) Offensive Tackle:  Yikes.  LZ is not really high on this group, and he provides reasons.  My take?  Many are good pass protectors, but struggie in run support. Walker is seeming like a great signing right now.  I think we grab the RT later, but LZ’s comments about mid round talent demonstrates that there is a lot of risk from top to bottom this year.  Personally, I think we might draft Parker early or Crownover later. LZ: Top prospects like Francis Mauigoa and Spencer Fano come with shorter-than-desired arms, while the gargantuan Kadyn Proctor is coming off a highly uneven season in pass protection. Caleb Lomu, Monroe Freeling and Max Iheanachor all have talent but are less polished than teams might like. There is an adequate number of starting-caliber bookends available early, but it becomes highly speculative for teams hunting quality depth by the middle of the third round. 10: Running Back.  Pass 11.  (Last) Quarterback:  This may be a place to find a developmental gem, an emergency QB who has longshot potential to compete should Bryce fail.  If people feel that this class is as bad as LZ suggests, could a gem fall into undrafted free agent status?   I think I would watch that dynamic. LZ;  Ty Simpson has a chance to become an NFL starter, but this is a below-average quarterback class with a low number of future starters and quality backups to choose from. It wouldn't shock me to see QB-hungry teams kick the can down the road and wait until next year.”   READING THE TEA LEAVES:  Of course, this is not to suggest that Lance Zierlein knows all and sees all.  But I will say that he is a good talent evaluator and he talks to the people in the front offices that we do not have access to.  We are often misled by hacks making crap up to get clicks and hits–and this is part of that environment, so “grain of salt.”   After reading this, I had the following thoughts: Taking an OT in round 1 seems like a mistake under most circumstances.  I think we need to find a RT to develop later in the draft.  I think we will add someone like Jude Bowery from Boston College in round 4.  I think we need to look at OT on both sides as if we have 1 year to groom a starter. If there is a run on Edges, a solid WR will be sitting there.  We could have a situation where the BPAs at #19 are either an edge or WR.  How would an elite WR help us?   At safety, if a team falls in love with Oregon FS Thienemen, the lack of depth behind him could force a reach. Could Carolina be that team?   The Panthers signed a decent C to a one-year contract. Centers with eventual starting ability can be found in rounds 3, 4, and even 5. Expect the Panthers to draft a center in round 4.  Yes, round 4.  I even predict Brian Parker from Duke.  Eerie, huh? We will be drafting a LB early, but I am guessing second round.  The next panther starting W ILB is going to be Rodriguez or Golday.  Madly on fire with my specific predictions–in round 2. Tight End?  Unless we dive in early, I do not see the upgrade.  I am willing to predict that we don’t draft a TE. Cornerback:  We will add a CB, probably a nickel (where there is value) late.  Defensive Line: Depending on what happens in round 1, Defensive line could be a late day 2 pick.   This may shock some of you.  I live on the edge.   ROUND 1:  Best value:  Edge, Wide Receiver, Cornerback.  I predict overdrafting OT and a run on edge will drop WRs and maybeCB  lower and a great value could land in our lap.  Could we do it again?  In the words of Brittany Spears, “Oops.” Corner?  Well, I think we will move Smith-Wade to FS at some point.  Smart, calls coverages.  Jackson is gone after 2026. . Get a nickel later, however, unless a stud CB falls. Please don’t draft TE here. Edge?  On paper, we are strong, but you can never have enough pass rushers.  We will leave awesome at one position that we may not have listed as a primary need: Edge, CB, or WR. ROUND 2:  Best Value: Linebacker.  I do not see us drafting another position here.  LB–Hill (longshot), Rodgriguez, Golday. Edge (second tier–Height, Jacas, Moore, Young, Howell–would be hard to overlook, but our GM is a former LB)  S A Haulcy is a darkhorse possibility. ROUND 3:  Best Value:  Defensive line. Halton (OK), Jackson (Fl. St), Durant (Penn State).   ROUND 4:  Best Value: Center.  Slaughter, Hecht, Jones, Lew, Coogan, Jones, Zuhn.  This is the only real option.  We should take our center in round 4. ROUND 5:  Best value:  They will be looking for a developmental OT here if not addressed sooner.  Jude Bowery ((BC), D. Crownover (RT-Tex AM), Wagner (RT-Notre Dame) seem promising.   
    • Spot-on. D-line and FS are much bigger immediate needs than OT or WR. Look at the current roster and the fact that they have not brought in any new players at those positions. 
×
×
  • Create New...