Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does Hurney want Pep?


KBRed

Recommended Posts

Marty Hurney has said since the end of the season that he wants to keep Peppers.

Do you think he really wants to keep Peppers or is there a possibility that he is saying this to use as leverage for a better trade to another team?

Either way, I think it's win/win for him and the organization.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes, he wants to keep him.

he has been trying to seal the deal for a couple years, right? the idea for peppers to leave didn't come from him. he wants pep to stay around. i'm sure that JR is fully behind this as well.

the only one actually involved in the situation that wants peppers gone is him. no one is going to try and make it easy. why should they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that you never want a franchise icon to leave the franchise.

Say what you want about Pep and his work ethic but you don't just want to get rid of a guy who can average 10-12 sacks a year, apparently without even trying. Especially if that guy is not a character risk.

I think Hurney most definitly wants to keep Pep if he can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that you never want a franchise icon to leave the franchise.

Say what you want about Pep and his work ethic but you don't just want to get rid of a guy who can average 10-12 sacks a year, apparently without even trying. Especially if that guy is not a character risk.

I think Hurney most definitly wants to keep Pep if he can.

That explains why Marvin Harrison, Brian Dawkins, Fred Taylor and so many others it seems this season have moved on to new teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The correct answer is both. He would like to keep Peppers because of his ability on the field. But if someone is willing to name the right price; and Hurney believes it helps the football team overall. Then Hurney would be happy to see him leave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That explains why Marvin Harrison, Brian Dawkins, Fred Taylor and so many others it seems this season have moved on to new teams.

I didn't think I would need to clarify but, ok.

You don't want to lose a franchise icon as long as you still think that player is a viable starter. Fred Taylor is what, 32. That's old for a RB. Marvin Harrison is turning 37 this year, thats old for any NFL player, plus he is starting to be an off field distraction. Dawkins is 35, that is also pretty old for a NFL player.

Peppers is 29, and still in his prime. Hurney does not WANT to get rid of him but I'm sure he is willing to if the price is right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just stirring the pot. I'm a little bored tonight.

Thats a good point, House. With Pepper's motivational issues and now (theoretically) locker room issues he brings to the table, I don't see much of a difference between him and those others. Dawkins is still a solid contributor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just stirring the pot. I'm a little bored tonight.

Thats a good point, House. With Pepper's motivational issues and now (theoretically) locker room issues he brings to the table, I don't see much of a difference between him and those others. Dawkins is still a solid contributor.

Lockerroom issues?

What motivational issues does he have? He just put up 14.5 sacks and what 5 FF's while being the sole threat on the DL.

He's not a high motor guy, but that doesn't qualify as motivational issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...