Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers have acquired Greg Olsen!(Update For #3rd Round Pick in 2012)


ammofan

Recommended Posts

so you really believe Dan Connor = Greg Olsen is an equal trade?

I do if you add a DP. Conner is a going to be a very, very good LB in the NFL...but let's be honest Bleys, Conner can not move to the outside and Beason is 100X better when he is in the middle.

Conner just got lost in the shuffle and has no real future here. He is a good player though (when healthy) and I hope he has a good career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it speaks volumes for our franchise, and Mr.Richardson, that players would rather stay on a 2-14 team then go to a team that was in the NFC championship LY.

Or maybe is speaks on how sh*tty the Bears are.

Oh not you're going to put that on Richardson

Its Beastson that got them wanting to stay

Pfftt @ you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no problem with trading Conner. We are deep at LB already and Conner can't play the outside. No room for him when Beason gets his extension.

I hope Conner plays well, but if the trade involves him, Hurney just made this team better by trading away a depth/special teams player for an instant offensive threat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it speaks volumes for our franchise, and Mr.Richardson, that players would rather stay on a 2-14 team then go to a team that was in the NFC championship LY.

Or maybe is speaks on how sh*tty the Bears are.

Swag Newton will do that for your squad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • I don't think Dave touches the defense. That might be a mark against him but definitely a huge red flag for evero. He refuses to run anything other than soft zone and when you don't get pressure that's an awful scheme
    • You don't have to convince me. I think not picking up the option should absolutely be firmly on the table but I just do not see Tepper and Morgan doing that for previously stated reasons. Therefore I'm not going to bother entertaining the notion. Just hoping we actually get real viable competition. If that doesn't happen at the minimum then my perception of that is complete and utter professional malpractice.
    • It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
×
×
  • Create New...