Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jets aren't going to re-sign Braylon Edwards


uncfan888

Recommended Posts

Sorry if this has been posted already.... I haven't been on here much lately

I think we should go after him... even with the weapons we've signed, it would be great to have a reliable #2 receiver.

Smith and Him on the wings, 2 TE set with shockey and olsen, D-Will or Stewart in the backfield....

even our QB's should be able to find an open guy with that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry if this has been posted already.... I haven't been on here much lately

I think we should go after him... even with the weapons we've signed, it would be great to have a reliable #2 receiver.

Smith and Him on the wings, 2 TE set with shockey and olsen, D-Will or Stewart in the backfield....

even Jimmy Clausen should be able to find an open guy with that

I think Cam should do alright with what we have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want the guy...not just because I have him and Smith on my Madden team either.

I don't see us picking up a WR. I think they are going to try and develop the guys we have. Plus, we really need to spend some money on a CB or two...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still not sure why people want a WR. We have a plethora of young guys who need to get on the field. Gettis, Lafell, Edwards, the WR from Hawaii (I can't think of his damn name), plus with our new TEs it should spread the field for our young guys even more helping them develop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

B.Edwards is a great WR without hands.

I think he has gotten over the drops. That was a knock on him in Cleveland but he seems to be doing better on that part.

If you watched him last yer with the Jets he was significantly better about not dropping balls. I really don't think he dropped that many. (EDIT: just checked, dropped passes - Holmes: 5 Edwards: 2)

But I'd rather go after a CB, DT before going after a WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i would love it, but i would rather wait until we have at least a starting caliber CB brought in.

i really can't imagine edwards (or any top end WR) being happy to come here considering how sparse the targets are going to be. that ball is going to be spread around an awful lot and anyone coming here would be aware of that. the first couple years of having a young QB like cam is going to make those targets even more rare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

B.Edwards is a great WR without hands.

meh...he's actually gotten a lot better over the past few years as far as drops are concerned. the dude earned that rep a few years back honestly, but he's gone a long way in turning it around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have more pressing needs than a proven num 2 receiver. Not to mention, IMO, the Greg Olsen acquisition was pretty much the same thing as getting a #2 reciever

that's very true. I definitely think he'll have the second most receptions after Smith this year. That was a great trade for us.. definitely worth a 3rd round pick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you think the NFL or NBA are worried about lawsuits or something like officiating scandals bringing down their empires, I think you're giving them way too much credit.  Go watch the documentary on Tim Donaghy in the NBA and who was involved and what he did.  One of the guys he worked with is still one of the league's top trusted officials, especially for playoff games.  IIRC, they have records showing he was the person Donaghy exchanged phone calls with the most during his time fixing games.  And his reputation is beyond horrible...  but he's untouchable.  I also encourage you to go watch DeMaurice Smith's Breakfast Club interview.  He laid out how for fans, we just know these organizations as a singular, public entity - like THE Carolina Panthers, or THE Dallas Cowboys- but, in actuality, he said that is the public-facing identity of an umbrella company comprised of countless smaller businesses and LLCs.  He is tasked with trying to audit their books, and he said these organizations are structured in such a way that even HE can't ever know what they truly make in a year.  It's impossible.  And now, this is just me speculating on top of that, but you think the league's themselves are structured similarly?  They are untouchable.  IIRC, they are recognized legally as "entertainment" organizations, thus protecting themselves in cases where integrity would come into question.  They are protected, layer, behind layer, behind layer.  Betting works because there is some degree of control that ensures the house wins more than it loses, by a lot.  The short of it is, "Give them bread and circuses" and all that jazz.  These leagues operate with total impunity.  Again, it's not just because I'm a Panthers fan, but even if I wasn't and I watched Superbowl 50 without a dog in the fight I would walk away feeling like that outcome was controlled and influenced HEAVILY to where the Panthers were not given a level playing field.  The same poo happens every Sunday to teams playing those blue blood franchises and ones with intriguing storylines. 
    • This Chuba isn't getting traded, but Rico very well could be in a few weeks if he keeps playing well in a tandem backfield with Chuba also playing well. I think we'd end up going with a two headed monster in that case, but with Rico being on a one year deal, it does open up the possibility of a contending team offering up a decent pick for him.  Depending on the recovery of Hampton, I could see someone like the Chargers giving us a 4th for him if they think he could put them over the top, he would fit nicely in a Harbaugh system I think. If it comes to that, we need to make that trade, as I can't see any way we re-sign Rico with all our other needs and getting Brooks back too.  And he's not going to get a contract big enough to get us any comp picks in return, especially if/when we sign a FA or two ourselves.  So if we're not going to bring him back, the prudent decision would really be to get a draft pick for him at the deadline.
    • It's all about what they do at QB. It's clear the rest of the roster is improving. If they commit long term to Young because he's being carried to wins then we're fuged. I think that's a separate issue to finally being competitive again.  There's no QB in this Draft that's going to ride in on his white horse on day one and save us, so we absolutely shouldn't be playing for Draft position. 
×
×
  • Create New...