Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is better for Cam's chance at stardom


Recommended Posts

I've been getting flamed on another post...I'm assuming it's your turn.

But to answer your question, he should logically sit for a year but with my heart, I want him to start day one. Huge Cam fan here and don't care who knows it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he should sit and play the later half of the season. He going to have to play anyway because we got to see what we can get out of him. I dont want our team to be in a position were we have different QB playing ever week.Once Newton get the job he has it for good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cam's stardom? seriously? that is what is important?

i guess if you are a fan of the player first, i guess it's understandable and welcome aboard the bandwagon.

but as a panthers fan, i don't care about anyone's "stardom". i just want to win games.

i liked cam the most in this draft because i thought he would be good for the team and help them win. how he is perceived doesn't really matter to me all that much as long as he helps this team win. thats all that matters.

you concerned about his stardom? winning games...thats how he's going to do it. doesn't matter when that starts, just as long as it does.

meh...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cam's stardom? seriously? that is what is important?

i guess if you are a fan of the player first, i guess it's understandable and welcome aboard the bandwagon.

but as a panthers fan, i don't care about anyone's "stardom". i just want to win games.

i liked cam the most in this draft because i thought he would be good for the team and help them win. how he is perceived doesn't really matter to me all that much as long as he helps this team win. thats all that matters.

you concerned about his stardom? winning games...thats how he's going to do it. doesn't matter when that starts, just as long as it does.

meh...

Yea and if you take the right steps with the guy you took #1 overall at the QB position you will win a lot of games. Don't get your panties in a bind, we're just talking football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want him to come in and run some plays and have a set right off the bat assuming that there is a better option in Anderson. Otherwise the best choice for the Panthers is to put the best guy out there day 1. If that is Newton then let him learn right away. If he can sit back and learn from a better option who knows the offense then I am fine for him to do that.

But to sit him protecting him while someone is awful makes no sense at all. Based on the last 5 years there is not a clear precedent to suggest that playing or sitting is more detrimental or helpful than the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...