Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Norwood>Brown


DickolausJ

Recommended Posts

Brown is a beast on madden atleast.

17 sacks in simulated year

norwood is actually better with his 90 block shed and 84 speed..

...nerds rejoice!:hurray:

Norwood-CJ-EdJohnson-Brown on the de line will net nice edge pressure and CJ up the middle will destroy.

However back to reality: I think Norwood is a player..he destroyed a few talent laden rosters in the SEC at both DE his junior year and OlB in his senior. He is a more instinctive DE...with zone skills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps foolishly my faith lies in Greg Hardy, I just hate he's missing all these reps over something stupid.

Guy really put himself behind with the motorcycle accident but at least he is alive.

He is probably the longterm answer. Has a chip on his shoulder and all the physical skills if he can stay healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Charles made an impact whenever he was on the field, even his first couple years. Really believe he should of started over Brayton right away but you know Fox... I'm just not seeing that from Brown, too inconsistent.

Excited for Norwood to get an opportunity now, hopefully hes our James Harrison, but I'm sure Brown and Hardy will be heavily rotated in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 Sacks in 2 years with limited reps, i don't call that a bust it takes time for rookies to get that confidence and swagger, Brown is going too be just fine.

I hope you are right, but he was a first round pick remember. Bad decision by the Panthers to use a first rounder on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Regardless of how we got here, any rational fan should be excited by how well Bryce played down the stretch. Anyone not happy about that level of play either doesn't know what they're looking at, or they're still trying to drive tired narratives. Obviously, Cam had an all-time rookie season, and I'm not putting the two in the same basket yet, but as someone who has watched every snap of Panthers football since the start of the new millennium (Im old), Bryce was playing at a higher level at the end of 2024 than Cam was at the end of 2012 (his 2nd season). Cam continued to develop into MVP form, something Bryce has to prove, but as someone who watched both (and will stan for Cam always), Bryce was playing at a higher level to end year 2 than Cam did.  Go watch the film if you dont believe me. None of that means anything for the future. But the people who said BY9 couldnt play in this league are wrong.   That being said, the only thing that matters is this year. #20 is perfectly fair IMO going into the season. I mean think about it, how would you rank him??!  His in-season turnaround is one of the wildest things I've ever seen... how do you rank a guy who looked like a massive bust in September and by January was consistently playing at a top 10 level? My excitement level is pretty damn high heading into this season. There were throws from the Chiefs game onward where Bryce had Drew Brees levels of anticipation. Im excited to see what he can do with a full deck on offense, something we really never gave Cam. Really hope and expect Bryce to move up this list this season.  
    • Not really, the only QB's (other than Anthony Richardson) ranked below him are new to their teams as a placeholder starter or drafted in 2024 or 2025, not a lot of gymnastics to get there. It's not about how many that is, if it's 20, 12, or 2... It means there isn't a QB who's team has committed to them for the long term right now that they have ranked below Bryce. That's not a great thing.
    • The changes to onside kicks were ridiculous and ruined a significant part of the game     It was already a high risk low reward play.  Why change it?
×
×
  • Create New...